Studies in Psychopathy

The Secret History of The World by Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Discover the Secret History of the World - and how to get out alive!


Political Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes by Andrew M. Lobaczewski, Ph.D.
with commentary and additional quoted material
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
The Psychopath: The Mask of Sanity Special Research by Quantum Future School
Discussion of Psychopathy Traits From The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley
A Basic Hypothesis of Psychopathy From The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley
Official Culture - A Natural State of Psychopathy? by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
The Inner Landscape of the Psychopath - Hervey Cleckley
"Stanley," a chapter from Hervey M. Cleckley's classic study of psychopaths, The Mask of Sanity
How Psychopaths View Their World
Retreat from Zaca - (3 files)

Dr. Strange, New Age Grifter or COINTELPRO?

"Dr. Strange" - Psychotherapist or Hacker and Thief?

Is Truth Defamatory?

Maynerd Most's Rebuttal
"I am the webmaster for Zecharia Sitchin..."
The Psychopath As Physician The Mask of Sanity - Hervey Cleckley - Excerpts
The Bad Seed: The Fledgling Psychopath
Sam Vaknin Revisited
An In-Depth Look At Where Sam Vaknin is Leading NPD
The Ambassador of Narcissism: An Interview with Sam Vaknin
A Soul With No Footprints
Antisocial Personality, Sociopathy, and Psychopathy
Anatomy of Malignant Narcissim
The Socially Adept Psychopath
The Origins of Violence: Is Psychopathy an Adaptation?
Bush isn't a moron, he's a cunning sociopath
The Partial Psychopath
Adventures with Cassiopaea by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Ark and Laura's Correspondence 1997 (8 files) Supplement to Adventures
Reader's Comments on Adventures With Cassiopaea
Mirror, Mirror On The Wall - Quantum Future School
Alvin Wiley's Letter
Alvin Wiley's subsequent letters to the public

the "Alvin Wiley" correspondence (10 files)

Letters from Readers About Jay Weidner
Dear Webmaster: - (2 files)
What is Laura Hiding? The Cassiopaeans Answer

Reader's Comments on "Is Laura Hiding Something?"

Transcript of direct channeling via "Frank Scott" on computer, July 22, 1994
Statement by Terry and Jan Rodemerk
Maynerd Most's post to the Cassiopaea Guestbook
Death Threat?
Organic Portals: The Other Race Quantum Future School (2 files) Disclaimer
Vincent Bridges, Jay Weidner: Magickal Mystery Tour Scam
Is Cassiopaea a Cult?
The French Connection by Laura Knight-Jadczyk Censored!
Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley PDF - book download FREE!
Kubrick's Psychopaths Society and Human Nature in the Films of Stanley Kubrick
The common problem with psychopaths... “Is they don’t see a problem with their behavior.”
Psychopath Support Group
“Non-victims can’t understand this, but the psychopath really does suck the life out of a caring person. I try to think of them now as a slimy suckerfish right out of the swamp, vacuum-lips out and prowling for someone vibrant and attractive to con and eviscerate.”

If you are a good person you will meet many evil people in your life, you need to recognize them and their actions. More importantly you need to recognize which evil behaviors you have been conned into accepting as reasonable and to reject those behaviors - both in yourself and in others - as unacceptable.

The English language has a variety of terms for psychopaths, of which "bastard" is perhaps the most polite. They have always been with us, and despite their corrosiveness and rejection of social mores, they show no signs of going away.

Think you can spot one? Think again. In general, psychopaths aren’t the product of broken homes or the casualties of a materialistic society. Rather they come from all walks of life and there is little evidence that their upbringing affects them.
Most of the two million psychopaths in North America aren’t murderers. They’re our friends, lovers and co-workers. They’re outgoing and persuasive, dazzling you with charm and flattery. Often you aren’t even aware they’ve taken you for a ride – until it’s too late.
The problem of plausible lies is the most serious problem facing humanity today....Most good people are only aware of the least intelligent part of the evil distribution; those are the people who are obviously evil: criminals. The normal and intelligent ends of the evil distribution totally escape most good people's understanding.

Only as of late, with all the Enron scandals and related crimes, people are waking up to the fact that the most dangerous psychopath of all is the educated, socially adept psychopath, in fact, Dr. Hare recently said that he would probably be able to find many psychopaths involved in the stockmarket. It is time for American to "wake up" says Dr. Wolman, because we are being threatened by a serious epidemic of psychopathy.

The Psychopathic or Sociopathic Personality

Based on twenty-five years of groundbreaking research, WITHOUT CONSCIENCE is a fascinating journey into the minds of these dangerous individuals. Are they born unable to feel empathy, or are they created by circumstance? How and why do they get away with cheating, conning, and murdering? Are they mad or simply bad? In what Dr. Hare calls our "camouflage society," how can we recognize and steer clear of these predatory people?

WITHOUT CONSCIENCE explores their shocking patterns- and exposes one of the most frightening, often-hidden social problems affecting our lives today.


The Psychopath is much more successful than you and I because he is not hemmed in by all sorts of impediments or worries.

A discussion with Adolf Guggenbuhl-Craig & James Hillman

“We fall prey to the seduction, it is irresistible. Then the nightmare of horror begins. The shabby treatment, the avoidance. I couldn’t believe it was happening to me. He had been so sincere, so kind. It was Jekyl and Hyde.”
“They go for the strongest and the best, but preferably those who are something of rebels within the group...the LEAST controllable. Because if they can crush them, they crush most of the rest at the same time. If they start at the bottom, with the weakest, it’s a long way to work their way up…The ideal target is therefore, strong, smart, rebellious and vulnerable through previous abuse.”
“A favored technique is to debilitate your identity [personally, I hate the term self-esteem] by levelling false accusations and/or questioning your honesty, fidelity, trustworthiness, your “true” motivations, your “real” character, your sanity and judgement.”
“They are absolutely the world’s best manipulators, liars, and fabricators of truth. They do so convincingly because they believe their own lies. After all their life is nothing but a lie, a sham, how can we possibly assume they know anything different.”
“Others around me would get so tired of the whole thing and insinuate that I was perpetuating things. All I wanted was for him to leave me alone. Part of the hurt and damage was done because others could but would not see what was actually happening. He would always try to ingratiate himself to others it was sickening. Usually psychopaths put on the nicest act, and you look like the harpy and bitch, and so everyone takes their side, it is a horror story, a psychopath can be very charming, and manipulative and manipulate the smartest of people.”
“My biggest frustration and source of anger, is at those who have refused to take a stand when they see the abuse . No matter how outrageous his behavior others often stood by and inadvertently fuelled his grandiosity and denial... although denial is too mild a word for it.
“If a psychopath throws the “bad childhood” stuff at you, keep in mind he might be trying to get sympathy and make an excuse for his atrocious behavior towards you and/or others. If we let these people make us feel sorry for them, we ultimately end up in the submissive position again...just what they want. I can “pity” them yes...but I refuse to shed another tear over the tragedies suffered by who is now, only a shell of a person.”

Regarding a psychopath: Considering a longitudinal section of his life is hard to avoid the conclusion that here is the product of true madness - of madness in a sense quite as real as that conveyed to the imaginative layman by the terrible word lunatic.

With the further consideration that all this skein of apparent madness has been woven by a person of (technically) unimpaired and superior intellectual powers and universally regarded as sane, the surmise intrudes that we are confronted by a serious and unusual type of genuine abnormality.

Not merely a surmise but a strong conviction may arise that this apparent sanity is, in some important respects, a sanity in name only. We find instead a spectacle that suggests madness in excelsis, despite the absence of all those symptoms that enable us, in some degree, to account for irrational conduct in the psychotic.

Only very slowly and by a complex estimation or judgment based on multitudinous small impressions does the conviction come upon us that, despite these intact rational processes, these normal emotional affirmations, and their consistent application in all directions, we are dealing here not with a complete man at all but with something that suggests a subtly constructed reflex machine which can mimic the human personality perfectly.

So perfect is this reproduction of a whole and normal man that no one who examines him in a clinical setting can point out in scientific or objective terms why, or how, he is not real. And yet we eventually come to know or feel we know that reality, in the sense of full, healthy experiencing of life, is not here.


“Leaving is hard because of all that goes along with the going. It is not just the person you have to give up but your hopes and dreams and fantasies. It only happened for me in increments and I cried UNCLE often thinking if I gave it one more go I’d break through. It wasn’t until I really knew that no matter what I said or did or didn’t do this person could never love me or anyone.”
“The fantasy was exactly that, a FANTASY, that he created for himself, and presented to me as reality. My head said the fantasy wasn’t valid. I kept reminding myself: if the fantasy was real, I wouldn’t be treated like dirt, and feel like shit!”
“I have finally come to the conclusion that they cannot change, so all we can do is to refuse to participate in their sick drama and leave the stage.”

Cleckley: [T]he familiar tendency to disintegrate, against which life evolves, may be regarded as fundamental and comparable to gravity. The climbing man or animal must use force and purpose to ascend or to maintain himself at a given height. [...] Whether regression occurs primarily through something like gravity or through impulses more self-contained, the backward movement (or ebbing) is likely to prompt many sorts of secondary reactions, including behavior not adapted for ordinary human purposes but instead, for functioning in the other direction. The modes of such reactivity may vary, may fall into complex patterns, and may seek elaborate expression. [...] People with all the outer mechanisms of adaptation intact might, one would think, regress more complexly. [...] In a movement (or gravitational drift) from levels where life is vigorous and full to those where it is less so, the tactics of withdrawal predominate. [...] The psychopath as we conceive of him in such an interpretation seems to justify the high estimate of his technical abilities as we see them expressed in reverse movement.

Organic Portals: The Answer to Psychopathy?

"Alien reaction machines" in human form describes individuals with Anti-Social Personality Disorder (APD), Sociopaths, and Psychopaths.
The material presented in the linked articles does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors. Research on your own and if you can validate any of the articles, or if you discover deception and/or an obvious agenda, we will appreciate if you drop us a line! We often post such comments along with the article synopses for the benefit of other readers. As always, Caveat Lector!


NOTE: This page used to be occupied by text of a very different sort than is now here. In place of said text, we have decided to tell the story behind why the text was here since demands have been made to remove the former contents of this page. The astute reader can "read between the lines" as well as follow a few links to get the whole story.


The subject of COINTELPRO comes up quite a bit on our websites and has done so since we became fully aware of its activity in the various New Age and "alternative news/views" movements back in late 2001. Up to that point in time, we were thinking that it was probably likely that, now and again, a group might be infiltrated by an agent for a specific purpose. What we were NOT aware of was the vast, overarching program that seems to be in place for the primary purpose of controlling absolutely everything via the control of the minds of the masses! As I wrote in The Secret History of the World:

Richard Dolan’s UFOs and the National Security State is the first comprehensive study of the past 50 years of the U.S. Government’s response to the intrusion of UFO phenomena in America. The compiled evidence - which includes government documents - suggests that a group of specialists working in the shadows, set up and executed the most massive cover-up in the history of government; and that the Human Potential movement and the subsequent New Age movements, were key elements of this cover-up. In other words, they not only have used the “colorful community” of alternative ideas as an unwitting tool of disinformation, it is highly probable that most of it was literally created by them as COINTELPRO. According to analysts, COINTELPRO was the FBI’s secret program to undermine the popular upsurge, which swept the country during the 1960s. Though the name stands for “Counterintelligence Program,” the targets were not enemy spies. The FBI set out to eliminate “radical” political opposition inside the US. What a lot of people do not realize is that this was a high level psychological operation specifically set up to vector “ideological” trends - beliefs, etc. of the ENTIRE COUNTRY!

Yeah, that's a pretty unbelievable project to contemplate, but for groups with unlimited resources and the agenda to stay on the top of the heap, it's really not so hard. And never has this activity been more evident than in the 9/11 Truth Movement which I want to discuss here.

I think that it is pretty easy to "read" the 9/11 Truth Movement into the above description of COINTELPRO in the "New Age." In fact, after all that practice, it must have been a piece of cake to just move in and co-opt those who were suddenly drawn into an "alternative" point of view by 9/11.

Now, one of the interesting things we have observed about COINTELPRO is the way it shifts and warps in response to possible exposure. I believe that I was the first to realize the extent and nature of the operation, and I began publishing my speculations about it in the Adventures With Cassiopaea series back in early 2002. Not too long after that, individuals that I KNEW to be "agents" of COINTELPRO began to start ranting about COINTELPRO and pointing the finger this way and that way. Up to this point in time, the lid had pretty much remained shut on the subject - I guess they were hoping that people would forget about it, or think that it was over and done with back in the 70s, nothing to worry about now!

But nope, I saw it and wrote about it and they just had to do something. So, in typical COINTELPRO fashion, they started producing endless noise to obscure the signal. Particular attention was paid to me; I guess I had to be punished for daring to call a spade a spade. I was accused of being COINTELPRO myself, of being funded by George Soros, my husband was accused of being an "ex cold war nuke scientist," and the previous attacks that had alerted me to the COINTELPRO problem to begin with - vile and vicious defamation, character assassination, and so on - ramped up to an unbelieveable level.

As usual, I learned a lot by observing and doing research to find out who was connected to whom.

Of course, once I began publishing such exposes, the program shifted again. The internet was already being scrubbed of articles and stories that did not support the government 9/11 claims that had been published in the early days after 9/11. Seems like some additional scrubbing took place in removing material that might link various agents together. Additionally, such resources as the "whois" services became useless with the use of "proxy registration" of websites. Many things that had been on the web before 9/11 suddenly disappeared. Many things also disappeared from the usually reliable webarchive as well. In some instances, we had the foresight to archive pages, but not always. I even have some pages archived and certified in my files. They may come in handy someday.

With over 100 researchers in our Quantum Future School, scattered around the globe, we have even resorted to sending a member out to do hand searches in various places. In one case, the member was shortly afterward visited by some "Israeli Art Students." How's that for "personal attention?"

Not long after I published research findings on the people behind GodlikeProductions Forum, we received an email warning, and two "personal contacts" of a threatening nature. Let us just say that when you begin to find connections between such popular websites and drug and pedophile rings, you are cruising into dangerous international trafficking waters and discretion may very well be the better part of valor. I removed the article from our website, though I do still send it to researchers who ask for it privately. I should note, while on the subject, that this is not uncommon: to find such connections; after all, that's one of the ways that secret agencies make their money - drugs and human trafficking, including children - and have the means to control government officials: blackmail. It's a pretty handy set-up: provide the drugs and the sex, get photos and movies or recordings, and voila! Instant control of just about anybody!

So, while I can't take the risk of telling exactly who is who here, just let me give a general warning: drugs and pedophilia - and even arms trafficking - are connected to a lot of people who you would never, ever suspect! Imagine! A popular New Age teacher giving seminars on such things as how to create your higher astral body and meet your angel guides (for example) who also runs a cover operation for shipping arms to CIA sponsored guerilla groups and ALSO has programs for "special children"? Can we say "Star kids" and "Indigo?"

Getting back to 9/11 and COINTELPRO in that venue: if you don't already know that probably 80 to 90 percent of what is out there is noise, then you might want to get up to speed pretty fast.

Now, let's get down to some specifics. There's a new guy on the 9/11 scene who just sort of appeared out of nowhere: Daryl Bradford Smith.

Daryl has declared himself to be the "Black Mamba" of the Truth Movement!

Well, I DO declare! Hush my mouth and shiver my timbers!

I've been watching Mr. Smith (funny, that reminds me Agent Smith in The Matrix!) for a bit now. Among his earlier publications was a sort of "how to recognize agents in the 9/11 Truth Movement guide". It was simple, straightforward, easy for anyone to understand. Even though something about it was disturbing, I included it on Signs of the Times one day.

Recently, I had an exchange with a few other 9/11 researchers on the subject of DBS, and I'd like to share a few excerpts:

DBS: Who is Jeff Rense? Try to find information about this man. People will justify his secrecy on the grounds that he is afraid for his life, which is justifiable. However, it is also possible that he is hiding something more sinister. His stepmother, Paige Rense, is editor-in-chief of Architectural Digest. This is one of the magazines owned by Si Newhouse.

LKJ: Well, Rense is a cipher to me, too. I only recently learned that he is a close pal of Jay Weidner and that he and Jay and Vincent Bridges used to be members of Ray Flowers group. The C's pretty clearly indicated Flowers as a COINTELPRO handler. From my point of view, after a long period of observation, Rense is out there pushing the alien noise agenda in a big way. He is a "tar baby." All the folks (and there are MILLIONS of them) who KNOW that the reality is strange, or who have had truly traumatic experiences (I think a lot of it is gov mind control programs) rush to be enfolded in the arms of anybody who will give them some validation, some peace of mind about what has happened to them. And then, they are RIPE for being vectored.

DBS: For all we know, Jeff Rense truly believes in UFOs, and associates of Si Newhouse or others are encouraging his UFO habit. See our article about the media if you never heard of Newhouse.

LKJ: I don't think Jeff Rense really "believes" what he promotes. Keeping in mind the close connection between Weidner and Rense, is very instructive to read the entire Weidner exchange that I published on our website . (Weidner is referred to as "Alvin Wiley" and Vincent Bridges is referred to as "Vincent Bridges" in some articles.) Some of the beliefs that Weidner espouses, that come up here and there in startling clarity, are truly scary. So, if Rense is a friend of Weidner, and it's a certainty (in my mind, you read the material and decide for yourself) that Weidner is COINTELPRO, then a lot of strange connections begin to make sense.

Suffice it to say that Rense publishes attacks on Art Bell, and now DBS is publishing attacks on Rense AND Art Bell. Looks like a typical COINTELPRO three way food fight designed to divert and distract and make a lot of noise and confusion.

DBS: If Rense wants to promote UFOs, then he should return to his previous web site,

LKJ: Rense can't. He sold the domain to Henry Winkler, a noted Zionist.

Now, let's get down to some direct analysis here. Last year, right about the time QFG was doing some research on some of these folks, an odd exchange took place between the above mentioned Jay Weidner and our webmaster. This may be very instructive in seeing how these types operate.

Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:57:36 -0700
Subject:              Weidner Email / "Slander"
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk


Just last night I received 4 identical emails from "Jay Weidner".  They all have identical content, and two are from and two are from

 The message looks form-letter-ish,and at first I thought it was a spam-out like Bridges did that once.

They are addressed to me personally, and state that I am the "web provider" for the "Vincent Bridges " page at "".

In very brief, they make accusations of "slander" and "defamation" because Jay's name is mentioned in the article.  The one new twist here seems to be that they state (in bold-italics) that Cassiopaea is a competitor to his "Sacred Mysteries" (b/c of Ancient Science and the other books you are selling) -- it appears to try to "establish motive" for the defamation charge.

Here is the email

[bunch of header stuff removed]

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:39:54 -0500
Message-ID: <000401c5146e$c6883320$72bbfea9@valuedus>
From: <>
To: Webmaster at
Subject: slander
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 13:11:48 -0800

From: Jay Weidner
Sacred Mysteries Productions
Seattle Washington


Webmaster at

[private home address deleted for privacy]

Dear Mr. L******:

Allow me to introduce myself.  My name is Jay Weidner.  I am the  president and co-owner of the company Sacred Mysteries Productions. 

Our site can be found at

As you can see Sacred Mysteries produces books and videos on such topics as alchemy New Age and Fulcanelli.  I also do tours of Egypt with my  wife Sharron Rose and tour master Nicki Scully.

The reason I am writing to you is that you are the web provider for this site located here:

As you can see from the article I am somehow associated with the tours of Magical Mystery Tours.  But a close perusal of the page in question quickly reveals that I am not part of Magical Mystery Tours nor do I go on these tours.  That company is owned strictly by Mr. Vincent Bridges.

  A perusal of the site advertising Magical Mystery Tours located at : also clearly indicates that I nor Sacred Mysteries productions have anything to do with that tour operation.  I am not advertised on the site as being a member of Magical Mystery Tours nor am I a presenter, tour guide or anything at all for these tours.

In fact, outside of writing a couple of books with Mr. Vincent Bridges, I have NOTHING to do with him or his various businesses.

I have nothing to do with the tours nor does the article in question say that I have anything to do with it.

Yet the headline of the article in question mentions my name clearly and clearly associates me with the company.  Furthermore the company and the tours are also clearly labeled a 'scam'.  While the tour company may or may not be a 'scam' it is clear from the reading of the article that 'Jay Weidner' has nothing to do with the company.  So why is my name mentioned in the article, especially in the headline?

Interestingly enough the writer of the article is associated with and the article appears on that site which is placed on your web provider service. clearly sells products, books etc. on alchemy, New Age ideas and Fulcanelli. 

In other words is a competitor with my company Sacred Mysteries. 

It is clear to me, to my lawyer and to anyone else reading the article that the arbitrary relationship suggested in the headline is purely designed to defame Sacred Mysteries and therefore me.  As is a main competitor with Sacred Mysteries there can be no doubt that this headline is designed to defame and slander my company and me in order to help destroy it.

It is obvious that this defamation is being done by a competitor in the same exact marketplace as Sacred Mysteries Productions.

While Sacred Mysteries enjoys competition it is obvious that the unproven allegations against me in this article are designed to destroy Sacred Mysteries Productions and is clearly placed there to hurt my business.

That is a clear violation of the rules of the web.  While Ms Laura Knight Jadczyk is free to say anything about me that is provable, it is defamatory to Sacred Mysteries and myself to say something that is unproven and false.  It is designed to solely to give an upper hand in our mutual competition in the open marketplace.

It is like the head of General Motors writing a defamatory article with unproven allegations about the head of Ford Motors. 

This is clearly a violation of web use rules and it also a violation of several Canadian laws designed to protect businesses and individuals from unfair and defamatory suggestions that are designed to hurt another company, especially one in competition in the same marketplace. 

Please  see: and,1367,38734,00.html

I am asking you to take down the article or have it changed to state the truth.  Since Sacred Mysteries or I have NOTHING to do with Magical Mystery Tours that makes you and your web provider service one hundred percent responsible for any damages that ensue.

Please either remove the article or any reference to 'Jay Weidner' in the article.

I will give you a limited period of time to correct the situation. 

In the meantime, if Sacred Mysteries Productions loses one contract or one customer due to the defamatory nature of the article I will be forced to hold you and your company completely responsible for the loss and will hold you accountable.

If you have any questions concerning this very serious matter please contact me immediately.

My number is Seattle is 206 417 9969.


Jay Weidner
Sacred Mysteries Productions

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Re: Weidner Email / "Slander"
Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:18:27 +0100

On 17 Feb 2005, at 7:57,  Webmaster at wrote:

> Just last night I received 4 identical emails from "Jay Weidner".  > They all have identical content, and two are from jayweidner@> and two are from >  The message looks form-letter-ish,and at first I thought it was a > spam-out like Bridges did that once.

Interesting that they are keeping such a close watch on our website, eh? 


> In very brief, they make accusations of "slander" and "defamation" > because Jay's name is mentioned in the article. 

Well, it was Vinnie's article that mentioned him and claimed that Jay Weidner was the partner, not me.

>The one new twist > here seems to be that they state (in bold-italics) that Cassiopaea is > a competitor to his "Sacred Mysteries" (b/c of Ancient Science and > the other books you are selling) -- it appears to try to "establish > motive" for the defamation charge.

We aren't competing with him.  As it happens, Cass was well established long before he had "sacred mysteries" and long before he wrote his books.  However, since he is now saying that he is not associated with Vincent Bridges and his operation, I will be happy to remove his name from the file and add a note that he complained and claims that he is not in any way associated with Vincent Bridges.


From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              (Fwd from Storm Bear Williams)  Jay, you are a fucking moron.
Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:29:10 +0100


After thinking about the matter a bit, I thought I ought to share with you an email a reader sent me from the now defunct Matrioshka List two years ago - where Vincent Bridges and Storm Bear Williams, his hacking buddy, held court.  It was apparently posted by Storm Bear to the list by accident since it was obviously a private email to Jay Weidner.

What is important is that it is a follow up to all that nonsense that Jay Weidner was writing to me that is posted at: where Jay Weidner has been given the pseudonym "Alvin Wiley," and it shows clearly that Jay Weidner was not the owner of Sacred Mysteries nor did he have any of his enterprise going on at that point in time, while we certainly had Ancient Science out there then... it came out in its first edition in 2002.

The first part is Storm Bear ranting at Jay, and Jay's original letter to Storm Bear is at the end.  Sounds a lot like the email he wrote to you.

------- Forwarded message follows -------

Date sent:            Fri, 24 Jan 2003 02:16:41 -0000
From:                 *************************
Subject:              Fwd:  Jay, you are a fucking moron.

--- In, Storm <stormbear@j...> wrote:

Jay, you lying sack of shit.

YOU are the one who wrote ME and said that I would be sued AND ARRESTED by your sorry ass if tried to publish my five books which was under Aethyrea copyright.

Here is the date you sent the email...

From: Goldenflower@c...
Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:19:13 EST
To: stormbear@m...
Subject: (no subject)

Here is what you said...

"No one is allowed to use any of the work copyrighted by Aethyrea Books LLC North Carolina. If one does use any of the work owned by this copyright they will be sued and, if possible, arrested.  No books, articles or anything else can be used by anyone without permission from Aethyrea Books LLC North Carolina." 

Because you thought that I would have forgotten that YOU tried to rip me off almost a year ago, I have reopened the "Weidner constellation" store. 

AND you have the intestinal gaul to blame your ineptitude and horrendous business acumen on Vincent. Let me know when you plan to start taking responsibility for your own life and stop blaming others for the black hole you are in. 

I can't really blame Vincent and Darlene for being cautious with you. Who knows when you are going to fly off the handle and start spouting bullshit or devolve into some other abnormal mode of behavior. I still am shock that you bought into the Cassiopaeans. Fiber protects. Cheese endangers. Remember that Jay. 

You point blank tried to seize EVERYTHING in the Aethyrea catalog (Me, John Major Jenkins, every word Vincent ever wrote, Steve Crockett, etc.) Was that your plan? Try to take control of Aethyrea and steal the copyrights of 12 or so books? Were you going to share the loot with the Cult in Florida? 


Enron clever. 

I am the sole owner of and I will do with it as I see fit. You are the one who let it lapse. Your ownership expired on October 31, 2001 and I bought it in April of 2002. That is SIX months. 

I had considered selling it back to you for what I have in domain and other fees once you settled your HUGE debt with Vincent and Darlene, but I see that is never going to be the case. As I see it, if you are betting that I forgot you tried to steal my work, then you are also probably betting that Vincent and Darlene will role over and let you fuck them some more. 

They have never ONCE lied to me. You on the other hand have tried to steal the copyrights of FIVE of my books and THEN had the brass to email me today and lie about it. " I am also not sure if you really believe it when Vincent says that I was attempting to 'steal your copyrights." You are the one who emailed me and threatened me with arrest, not Vincent. 

Who in the world do you think I am going to believe or trust? 

Do NOT fucking email me again. 

If I hear ONE word coming from you OR your retched colon, you will be amazed what I do with the 

And you thought was bad. 

Storm Bear 


On Tuesday, January 21, 2003, at 06:34  PM, Goldenflower@c... wrote: 

> Dear Storm Bear:

> > Hi my name is Jay Weidner.  I am sure you have heard of me although I am

> equally sure what you have heard is incorrect.

 > > I am also not sure if you really believe it when Vincent says that I

> was > attempting to 'steal your copyrights', I assure you that I was only

> attempting to save the copyright on AMET and had no idea that you, and >

others, also had material copyrighted under the (until January 2002)  false

> business name of Aeytheria Books LLC.

> > I only say this to you to reveal that I am not after anything from you

but > one piece of information, which is this:  Vincent and I had an

agreement. > This agreement stated that I would give him Aeytheria Books

LLC, which I > owned under NC State law, in return he would give me the

domain name > '  He also told me that you owned this

domain name.

> Although I did my part and gave him the ownership of Aeytheria Books LLC

he > has, of course, not yet fulfilled his part of the bargain.  It has been

9 > months since I gave him back Aeytheria Books LLC but he still has not

given > me 

So I am wondering - do you really own the domain > name?  If so, is he

bargaining in bad faith or are you going to give it to > us if he asks you

to?  If so, will you sign an agreement saying that this > is so? > 

If this is false, and you do not own the domain name, would you mind >

informing me of this also?

> > Thank you for your time in this matter.  I am sorry if I have >

needlessly > involved you but the above scenario is troubling and I need to

get to the > truth.

> > Sincerely,

> > Jay Weidner

> 805 688 5699

------- End of forwarded message -------

Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 10:47:31 -0700
Subject:              Re: Weidner Email / "Slander"
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk 

Vincent Bridges seems to have removed Jay Weidner's name from his website on the pages that you click through to from the Scam article on

Hmm... I just connected home, and had another email from "sharonrose".   It's almost like he anticipated your comment here.  And he's getting a little more threatening.  It seems strange that he's in such a rush to remove something that he complains about me not responding in <17 hours...  (His original message was dated at 3:00 pm yesterday, and this one is 8:00 am today.)

[header stuff deleted]Message-ID: <002a01c5150f$6d45a260$72bbfea9@valuedus>
Reply-To: <>>
From: <>

To:  Subject: proof of slander
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:40:43 -0800

Mr.  L**********

I have just seen a copy of the original ad for Magical Mystery Tours.  I  am sure that you must also have a copy because it was on the cassiopaea  site until February 14th 2005.

Believe it or not someone has added my name to the Magical Mystery Tour  description.  And it could have only been done by you or Laura Knight Jadczyk.

Let get this straight:  My name was added to the tour within the last week even though I was not mentioned on this same page on  until Feb 15 2005.

I hope you understand the implications of this. 

Someone is adding my name to the tours of which I had nothing to do with.  This is a lie of  the highest order and it is done with the sole intention of trying to destroy me and my company Sacred Mysteries.

You, as provider for are completely responsible for what happens on that site.  I can now prove beyond any shadow of a doubt that  the information on the offending page was completely contrived by either you or someone associated with the

It is one thing to mistakenly assume that I am part of a tour that may  or may not have happened.  It is a crime to add my name to the page when it was never there.As you have not responded yet and as you have not taken down the page I can only assume that you are part of the crime.

Therefore I will be geting an attorney in Calgary (one of my best friends lives there.  He may be paying you a visit)You can expect this to go all the way. 


Jay Weidner

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Re: Weidner Email / "Slander"
Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:03:08 +0100

On 17 Feb 2005, at 10:41,  Webmaster at wrote:

> >Well, it was Vinnie's article that mentioned him.

> >Did you read it?

> That's hilarous -- I hadn't clicked through to view Vinnie's article,

> but sure enough, it has his name right in there...

> [snip]

Oh, that's rich.

I think that what actually happened was that since we updated the site, adding a new sidebar, google just picked it up and shot it to the top of page rankings because it is a certainty that NOTHING was added other than the navigation bar!

Okay, try to help the guy out before he has apoplexy.  I'll publish his letter, make a public apology, and remove his name from the title, but leave it in the Vinnie article and just mention that obviously Vinnie is in the business of defaming honest and "hardworking" folks like Jay Weidner...


From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Re: Weidner Email / "Slander"
Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:17:09 +0100

On 17 Feb 2005, at 10:47,  Webmaster at wrote:> Vincent Bridges seems to have removed Jay Weidner's name from his website >on the pages that you click through to from the Scam article.

That suggests that they are actually working together, doesn't it?

Here it is with Weidner's name still there on the webarchive:

Where it says, dated: June 7th through June 14th 2003

Join the authors of A Monument to the End of Time -- the only full scale examination of Fulcanelli's masterpiece -- Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner, as they reveal the meaning of the secrets hidden in plain sight on and within the Gothic cathedrals of Paris, Amiens and Chartres. With Fulcanelli's masterpiece for a guidebook, and the on-site help of our guide Yanka Marie De Rokay, this truly one of a kind tour reveals the initiatory pattern at the heart of alchemy, the great secret itself. It also raises the even more interesting question of how the secret came to be carved on the front of cathedrals.

Yup, seems they removed his name from the 2003 page on Bridges site, but as we see, it is on the webarchive and Jay certainly knew it WAS there.  So he's simply lying, whining and screaming...

So, his accusations that WE added his name become rather slanderous, don't they?

I'll get the webarchive pages certified for evidence if it is ever needed.

I'm still willing to work with the guy.  Unlike Weidner and Bridges, I DO have a heart and if I am left alone, I am willing to leave them alone.

He hasn't really been bothering us, and I don't want to deprive the guy of his livelihood.

But, I also know that he is a slimy liar and not to be trusted for one instant...

So, how to deal with him???

Don't answer him at all just yet.  Let me think... I think it's time to send the exchange off to our legal advisor for a bit of advice...


From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Re: Weidner Email / "Slander"|
Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 19:26:29 +0100

On 17 Feb 2005, at 10:47,  Webmaster at wrote:> Hmm... I just connected home, and had another email from "sharonrose".>   It's almost like he anticipated your comment here.  And he's > getting a little more threatening.  It seems strange that he's in > such a rush to remove something that he complains about me not > responding in <17 hours...  (His original message was dated at 3:00 > pm yesterday, and this one is 8:00 am today.)

Jay is absolutely cracking me up!

There it is, big as life, on the webarchive, and he has the gall to accuse me of adding it?!

Oh, this is RICH!

Don't mention it until I get it legally certified and hear back from the legal eagle.


From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              web archive
Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 21:14:12 +0100

Have saved all the Vincent Bridges pages on the webarchive as pdf files.  Have written to the legal certification team to get them all witnessed and certified as being on the web as they are this instant in case they get scrubbed.

This one is sacred mysteries while Storm Bear owned it... it is clearly defamatory towards US! on Nov 29, 2002

Here is Sacred Mysteries AFTER the email from Stormbear to Jay when Jay was begging for the domain.  Apparently he got it... on Jan 25, 2003

Wonder what he had to pay/do to get it from Storm Bear. Sounds to me like all kinds of weird stuff goes on among that bunch of grifters.

Then, there was which Jay owns and which is clearly defamatory...

Yes, he took it down as he said he did and that is why I am willing to work with him. I think he has just been maneuvering and manipulating to disconnect himself from Bridges and has stepped all over us just to try to convince Bridges that he is his pal.

Sometimes I really feel sorry for the guy. I used to think he was no match for Bridges cunning, but now I wonder. He isn't doing too badly. More power to him. He put one over on Vinnie (unless, of course, which is entirely possible, they are now playing "good cop/bad cop" again.)

The ball is really in his court.


Date sent:            Thu, 17 Feb 2005 17:24:48 -0700
Subject:              Re: Weidner Email / "Slander"
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk 

Hmm, further developments.

Sometime this afternoon (I think before I sent my email), Jay Weidner phoned my home number and left a message.

Basically, he started off sort of pseudo-friendly, saying that he was going to be in Calgary sometime next week (I forget which day), and he'd like to stop by and see me.  Then he went on to say that if the page wasn't changed, etc, etc, he'd have to "take things on to the next step", which was "well, you'll see", injecting comments about getting a lawyer, etc.  The message kind of scared my wife.

Anyway, he certainly seems to be very anxious about this issue!

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
To:                    Webmaster at 
Subject:              Weidner
Date sent:            Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:08:45 +0100


Our legal eagle has completed a letter and affidavit for Weidner to sign so that we can remove his name from the website.  But, before we send him the legal documents, send him the following email (based on legal advice).

Dear Mr. Weidner, 

I am in the concluding stages of investigating the serious matter you have brought to my attention.  Could you forward to me your full name, mailing address,  registered name and address of your company  with company number, state of incorporation, date of incorporation, (concerning "Sacred Mysteries") so that I may send you a document to be signed before I can authorize any changes to the website as you have requested. 

Thank you, 

Webmaster at


Once he sends you his address, then you print and send to him the attached letter and affidavit.

Site Administrator
[Insert Date]

Jay Weidner
Sacred Mysteries Productions
[Street address]
Washington State

Dear Mr. Weidner

Thank you for your emails.  As you can appreciate I take the matters that you have brought to my attention and the manner in which you have done so very seriously and will be prepared to take the appropriate action as the need arises.

In your emails you threaten me with not only legal action but "a visit" from your friend the attorney.  You also threaten that I "can expect this to go all the way" and you state that I have committed a crime against you. 

Given that all this correspondence arrived within 24 hours and you then followed it with your threatening telephone message and that this is the first time I have ever heard from you I find your approach excessively aggressive. 

I would suggest that we can resolve these matters in a reasonable and mature manner as set out below.  However, in the meantime I would remind you that both in the United States and Canada to threaten me in the manner that you have is a felony.  As a resident of the United States, threatening a foreign person is a matter that falls within the jurisdiction of the US Justice Department and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.  Should you threaten me or cause or procure any other party to pressure, coerce, threaten, meet or talk with me or any members of my family or any other party with whom I am associated I shall not hesitate to report the activity to the appropriate authorities and pursue all civil and other legal recourse available.

In order to assist you in your request that changes be made to the website that you refer to I must ensure that we are absolutely clear as to the facts of the matter.  As soon as the facts are established I shall do what I can to meet your requests based upon the facts.

In order to establish the facts please could you therefore provide me with a sworn and notarized Affidavit.  Attached to this mail is the text of the Affidavit that I require.  It has been drawn up in your own words as set out in your emails of [    ] February 2005 and [   ] February 2005 and as such should not cause you any problem.  I will require two original copies which I suggest you send by courier to avoid unnecessary delays.

In the event that I do not have two original copies of your Statutory Declaration and Affidavit within ten days from the date hereof I shall assume that you no longer wish to pursue this matter and that the charges and accusations that you level have no substance and can therefore be treated accordingly.

Yours sincerely

Webmaster at


This declaration is the sworn testimony of Jay Weidner [please insert full name], of [please insert full legal residential address] made this___________ day of March 2005.

1. My name is Jay Weidner [please provide full legal name].

2. I am the president and co-owner of the company Sacred Mysteries Productions of [please provide registered address of the company] with company number [please provide company number] incorporated in the state of [please provide state] under the laws of [state] on [please provide date of incorporation], hereinafter referred to as "Sacred Mysteries".

3. The website of Sacred Mysteries can be found at

4. Sacred Mysteries produces books and videos on such topics as alchemy New Age and Fulcanelli and arranges tours of Egypt with myself, my wife Sharron Rose and tour master Nicki Scully. 

5. Magical Mystery Tours is a company owned by Mr. Vincent Bridges with its website at   This company offers its own tours which are in no way associated with Sacred Mysteries, myself or my wife.

6. I do not have and nor have I ever had any association with Magical Mystery Tours whether as a presenter, tour guide or in any capacity whatsoever.

7. Sacred Mysteries, its directors, officers or staff do not have and nor have they ever had any association with Magical Mystery Tours whether as a presenter, tour guide or in any capacity whatsoever.

8. My name has never appeared on the website of Magical Mystery Tours nor in any other promotional material whether printed or electronic associated with Magical Mystery Tours.

9. I am not a business partner of Mr. Vincent Bridges and my only association with Mr. Vincent Bridges has been the writing of two [please correct the number as appropriate] books.  I have NOTHING to do with him or his various businesses whatsoever.

10. I consider and believe that is a primary competitor of Sacred Mysteries.  I further believe that will do anything its power to damage me and Sacred Mysteries so as to give an upper hand in our mutual competition in the open marketplace.

11. I am the owner of

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have signed this Affidavit on the __________ day of March 2005 at ______________________________ [please provide address of location]                  .

SIGNED by the above named               )

Jay Weidner [please provide full name]        )

At [please provide address]             )

In the presence of:-                    )

[please provide witness signature, printed name, address and occupation.  Witness should not be related or an employee or business associate]

Before me

Notary Public

Date sent:            Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:31:58 -0700
From:                  Webmaster at 
Subject:              [Fwd: Re: slander]
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk 


I just checked my email and received both your emails, and this one from Jay. I will send the letter you have forwarded and await his reply.

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: slander
Date:     Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:58:12 -0800
From:     <>
To:        Webmaster at 

Webmaster at

I see that you have decided to keep the 'scam' article up even though there is no visible 'scam' in the article and even though it was all presented by Vincent Bridges tour company.  A company that I have nothing to do with.

I am retaining a lawyer in this matter as Canadian laws are quite explicit concerning defamation.  You will be held one hundred percent responsible for the thousands of dollars already lost because of this defamation.

I do not wish to go this route.  I actually like and admire Laura Knight Jadczyk and have been caught between her and Mr. Bridges web war for a long time.

I actually also agree with her conclusions concerning Mr. Bridges.  I have had zero to do with him for years.  In fact the writing of the last book nearly erupted into a full scale war between the two of us causing our publisher many headaches.  Needless to say all of the trouble was caused by Mr. Bridges.

I would like to make peace with Laura and her husband Ark.  I have taken down all articles concerning the cassiopaeans on  They have been down since June 2004.  I thought that this would send a clear message to the two of them that I was not interested in the stupid attacks by Bridges directed towards them.

I also asked Mr. Bridges to remove all articles concerning my dealings with Laura and Ark off of his website  Of course he has refused.  I am currently also retaining an attorney to stop him from publishing these articles.  Also you should know that Vincent attached my name to the articles supposed written by me after doing all of the writing himself.  These include 'Jay Weidner Laura Knight Jadczyk and the Cassiopaeans' and 'Who are the Cassiopaeans'.

I would write to Laura and Ark concerning these issues and many more but I am afraid that they will violate my privacy and print them on their site.  I am also afraid that you will do the same.  While this is an audacious act it does little to facilitate communication between us.

So that's it.  I don't want to hurt them and I am sorry that I may have done so in the past.  I am ready to quit the shooting war but, as I cannot communicate with them, I am at a loss to figure out a way to do it.

I will not have any contact with Vincent Bridges unless it is through my lawyer.

That all said I wish that you would remove my name from the site.  I will be forced to take legal action and I don't want you and I to spend all of our money on lawyers.

I hope you see my point and can help us all get this behind us.


Jay Weidner

Date sent:            Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:37:46 -0700
Subject:              JW Update (No News)
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Just a quick update, I haven't heard anything from Jay yet.

It was Wednesday evening that he wrote back saying: "I'll sent it tomorrow".

Date sent:            Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:44:38 -0700
From:                 Webmaster ad
Subject:              Re: JW Update (No News)
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk <>

"Laura Knight-Jadczyk" wrote:

>What was he going to send?  The information you requested or the affidavit?

>Is that all he said?


That was his response to my message asking for his details (company name, etc).

Then I haven't heard anything from him since....

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk <>
To:                   Webmaster at
Subject:              Re: JW Update (No News)
Date sent:            Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:07:52 +0100


Well, since he was so hot to claim damages to his "company" and so anxious to get the page changed, this is rather odd.  One thing that comes to mind, since you put him "on the spot" about said company, is that maybe he does NOT have a "real company" so to say.  Maybe that is the hold up.  Maybe he doesn't have a "company number" or any legal corporation. 

If that is the case, then it means his whole thing was a load of hot air trying to intimidate...

Just speculating.


Date sent:            Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:50:46 -0700
From:                 Webmaster at
Subject:              Re: JW Update (No News)
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk <>

I just checked my mail today, and got a card for a Registered Letter. I picked it up at the post office, and it's from Jay.

[Scanned copies were faxed to you for viewing]

The letter appears to be identical to the original emails, and according to the postmark was sent on the 17th, which is the Thursday that he phoned and sent more emails (Weds 16th was the first email). 

(The message was delivered the 23rd, but I hadn't checked the mail until today.)

That's quite a moving center he's got ;-)

Since the content is nothing new, I don't think it changes anything.  We're still waiting on him...

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Re: JW Update (No News)
Date sent:            Mon, 28 Feb 2005 08:11:03 +0100

On 27 Feb 2005, at 17:50,  Webmaster at wrote:

> Since it was a registered letter, he will be able to check that I've

> received it, but since the content is nothing new, I don't think it

> changes anything.  We're still waiting on him...

I notice he didn't sign it.  Interesting, eh?

Looks like more bluff.

Another thing is, it is hard evidence that he is "stalking" you as well as evidence of his lies.


Date sent:            Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:14:32 -0700
Subject:              JW Response
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk 

Well, finally received a response from Jay as follows:

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Re: slander
Date:     Mon, 28 Feb 2005 07:28:01 -0800
>From:    <>
To:        Webmaster at 

Webmaster at

The name of the company is DBA Sacred Mysteries Distribution.  We are a Colorado corporation that is registered as a foreign corporations (i.e. out of state) in Washington.

All of this can be easily discovered on the internet.

You must understand that I have had my life threatened repeatedly by Laura Knight Jadczyk. On the site that you are the provider I am called a 'psychopath' and many other horrible things.

In this light I do not believe that you will keep any information that I give you in confidence. I am sure that you are sending everything on to Laura Knight Jadczyk.

I know that you created the Pentagon Strike video and commend you for you research. However I cannot trust the cassiopaeans. I have many emails from former followers and others who have attended their quantum school.  They warn me that she is obsessed with me in particular.

One student told me in an email that she asked him to find me and kill me.

I realize that she is a tragic figure, an alcoholic, abused child and probably a mind control slave for some intelligence agency, but that does not give her the right to constantly attack me. I have done nothing to her except that I tried to make peace between her and Vincent Bridges.  For that action I have been threatened, defamed and attacked.

The one thing that I have noticed about Laura is that whatever she accuses someone of - it is usually a reflection of her own deepest fears.  That is why she is so obsessed with 'psychopaths'. This is why she constantly, reads, writes and speaks about them. She is exploring her own misbehavior and is projecting her deepest fears concerning herself out into the world.

Now she masquerades as a dissident, she escaped to France to hide the fake house raffle scam in which she stole $250,000 from many people. The F B I has her on a terrorist watch list and her organization probably has been infiltrated by French Intell.

If I was you I would be very careful.

Now you are asking me for personal information. Since I first wrote to you a couple of weeks ago the cassiopaea site has been flooded with more and more defamatory articles about me. This is no doubt due to your relaying my letters to you over to Laura Knight Jadczyk. I have no doubt that you will be sending this letter also.

Realize that you are now directly implicated in this ordeal. Like it or not you have now touched the tar baby and it will never go away. If I go public with what I know about Laura Knight Jadczyk ( and I know a lot!) I will be forced to bring up your name as one of the people who has defamed me.

So please, let us get this all behind us. I will remain silent on all matters as long as my name is removed from the cassiopaea site.  That's the deal.


Jay Weidner

---- Original Message -----

From: Webmaster at
To: <>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2005 6:36 AM
Subject: Re: slander

Mr. Weidner,

I am still waiting for your full legal name, registered name and legal mailing address of your company with company number, state of incorporation, date of incorporation, (concerning "Sacred Mysteries") so that I may enter them into the affidavit that I will forward to you via mail, that must be signed before I can authorize any changes to the website as you have requested.

An unsigned registered letter without those details does not assist me in my efforts to assist you.

Since you have indicated that "time is of the essence," let me advise you that it will take several days for google results to reflect any change, and said changes cannot be made without the required affidavit from you .

So, he is saying, basically "all the information you asked for can be easily discovered on the internet", but "I'm afraid to tell you anything for fear that you are a tool of Laura".

It's very flattering to be credited with the Pentagon Strike video! 

He doesn't do much research, does he?

He's clever enough to make some of his accusations indirect -- "one student told me", etc...  But some of them are just plain weird.

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Re: JW Response
Date sent:            Mon, 28 Feb 2005 23:49:25 +0100

Well.... that was about the most bizarre rant I have ever read.  That guy is  flipping NUTS!

The bottom line of his "company info" is that he probably doesn't even have  one.

We picked the legal eagle up from the airport this afternoon, but it is late and he  has gone to bed.  In the a.m., I'll let him read Jay's response and he can formulate a next step.

Sheesh... I still can't believe the nonsense...

Quite different from the one he wrote the other day, eh?  Where he was sorry  for being so bad to us... sorry that he let Vinnie use his name and we never  did anything and all that.

Sheesh.  He ought to at least try to get his story straight.

Watch list?  French intell?

What a looney tune!


Date sent:            Mon, 28 Feb 2005 16:03:58 -0700
Subject:              Re: JW Response
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk 

"Laura Knight-Jadczyk"   wrote:

>Well.... that was about the most bizarre rant I have ever read.  That guy is >flipping NUTS!

>The bottom line of his "company info" is that he probably doesn't even have one.

Yeah, that might be the reason for the rant, too.  Very strange.

It's interesting how terrified he is of his emails being used against  him -- a little strange if all you were writing about was to say " this page is slanderous, please remove it".

And all we are trying to do is cooperate legally with full legal protection on our side.

From:                 Laura Knight-Jadczyk 
Subject:              Response to Weidner
Date sent:            Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:35:48 +0100


We have had a lengthy meeting with our legal advisor and, after going over the entire exchange, we  agree that he is "huffing and puffing" to try to "blow the house down." 

However, as I said, I would really like to just make peace and we would like to make one more try to get valid information for our own protection, assuming that he is serious in what he wants to accomplish. i.e. make peace and be done with it.

So, the following email has been written to (hopefully) elicit either a serious response or a lunatic rant - depending on which description really fits Weidner.  We can't really tell just yet.

So, send it off and let's see what happens next.



Dear Mr Weidner

Thank you for your email of Monday 28th February 2005 (07:28:01) in which you threaten me again despite my polite attempts to help you.

The information that I have asked for is not personal as you yourself say that it is available on the internet yet you continue to avoid providing it.

I would point out to you that it is you who contacted me with your emails, telephone calls, and recently the recorded delivery by mail of copies of your previous emails, and that I am seeking to address the complaints you have made.  Yet you seem to be incapable of understanding the situation. 

Let me put it simply:-

(i)  you contacted me via email, telephone and mail with certain complaints and threats,

(ii)  I have responded with a simple request for basic information in order that I may have an Affidavit drawn up based on your own statements to me in the above referenced communications,

(iii)  the Affidavit will be a simple, clear and unambiguous statement by you  of your existing claims and complaints including details of your company (which you claim is being damaged by certain internet content),

(iv)  as soon as I have two original copies of the Affidavit I will take all necessary and appropriate measures.

I therefore require you to provide the following information:-

(a) Your full legal name [                   ]*

(b) Your legal address.  This should be residential but may be your

    company's registered office. [                               ]*

(c) Your company name [                          ]*  Please clarify whether

    the company name is Sacred Mysteries Productions, Sacred Mysteries

    Distribution or

(d) Company registered address [                          ]*

(e) Company State of Incorporation [                        ]*

(f) Company number [                         ]*

(g) Company Date of Incorporation [                           ]*

(h) The number of books you have co-written with Mr Vincent Bridges.

* please fill in as appropriate.

As you state that your company is incorporated in the state of Colorado and registered as a foreign corporation in the state of Washington it will ease matters considerably if you provide the Colorado and Washington corporate documents.  These should be certified "true and exact" copies.

If you fail to provide this information I shall be left with no choice but to assume that you are a fraud and a fake and that all the statements and claims you make are without basis, merit or fact.  Should this be the case any further communications from you will be treated in the appropriate manner.

Date sent:            Tue, 01 Mar 2005 12:55:06 -0700
Subject:              Re: Response to Weidner
To:                   Laura Knight-Jadczyk 

"Laura Knight-Jadczyk"   wrote:

>So, send it off and let's see what happens next.

Well, I got a message back (10:50-ish, it said, and it's 12:50-ish now) in which it looks like he hit "reply" and then hit "send".  There is no added text, just the quotation of the full message I sent.  The subject line had "Re: ", so it wasn't an attempt to forward it to someone...

Since no answer was returned from Jay Weidner after this last email to him in an attempt to get factual information so that we could deal with him decently, we decided to try a more direct approach.  Ark wrote to Jay as follows:

From:                 Arkadiusz Jadczyk
Subject:              peace?
Date sent:            Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:56:50 +0100

Dear Jay,

We hear that you are having some kind of problems, though we do not exactly know what kind of.

We (that is me, Ark, and also Laura) do not have any personal animosity towards you and we would be willing to help you - if only we can. We are busy with our stuff and you are busy with yours. There is no reason that we can see why we can't "normalize" our relation. If that is what you are also seeking - let us know.


From:                 <>
To:                   "Arkadiusz Jadczyk"
Subject:              Re: peace?
Date sent:            Thu, 10 Mar 2005 19:32:37 -0800


No I am not having any problems, in fact my life has never been better.  My video production company is doing better beyond my dreams and I have finally achieved the independence that I have been seeking for years.

I would very much like to normalize our relations.  In fact I am currently in negotiations with a major US network to do a docmentary on Fulcanelli and would like to have Laura on camera for an interview.

I have not talked to VB [Vincent Bridges] in a year and a half nor will I ever speak, write or hopefully even think about him again.

I understand your problems with him.  Believe it or not I have fared far worse with him than you two. I expect that you may find that fact a little difficlt to believe, nevertheless it is true.

I can certainly understand your expose of him and regret that I EVER defended him.

The slogan for the 21st century is 'No good deed goes unpunished'' and I am proof of this.  I thought I could help him.  But it did no good.

So that's it.  Tell Laura to keep up the great work.  I look forward to her next discussion on Fulcanelli.

My apologies for everything.


Jay Weidner

From:                 Arkadiusz Jadczyk
To:                   <>
Subject:              Re: peace?
Date sent:            Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:26:04 +0100

On 10 Mar 2005 at 19:32, wrote:

> Ark:

> No I am not having any problems, in fact my life has never been better.  My video production company is doing better beyond my dreams and I have finally achieved the independence that I have been seeking for years.

Hi Jay,

We are glad to hear this good news.

> I would very much like to normalize our relations.  In fact I am currently in negotiations with a major US network to do a docmentary on Fulcanelli and would like to have Laura on camera for an interview.

I my opinion Laura is The Best on this field. But I am her husband, so my opinion doesn't count as much as when it comes from other researchers in the field. 

> I have not talked to VB in a year and a half nor will I ever speak, write or hopefully even think about him again.

Year and a half you say? You know, we have on one of our websites the page on "Magickal Mystery Tour Scam". It comes to my mind that we could remove your name from there, and instead add the following note:

Note: The original ad for this tour lists Vincent Bridges and Jay Weidner as organizers. But Jay Weidner kindly informs us that his name was added there without his knowledge and consent.

Do you think such a note would be appropriate?


And best wishes for you.


From:                 <>
To:                   "Arkadiusz Jadczyk"
Subject:              Re: peace?
Date sent:            Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:15:02 -0800


Yes that would be nice.

I would also like to completely disassociate myself from Vincent.  If you could remove my name from anything to do with him I would appreciate it.  I am currently removing my two books with him from my web page and from Sacred Mysteries. I do not wish to give him any more positive advertising.


Good luck to both of you.


Jay Weidner

See also:


Where Jay Weidner still seems to be associated with Vincent Bridges.

Weidner is listed here as reccommended reading:


You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .



[an error occurred while processing this directive]