the Secret History of the World - and how to get out alive!
Ponerology: A Science on The Nature of Evil adjusted for Political Purposes
M. Lobaczewski, Ph.D.
with commentary and additional quoted material
by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Psychopath: The Mask of Sanity Special Research by
Quantum Future School
of Psychopathy Traits
From The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley
Basic Hypothesis of Psychopathy From
The Mask of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley
Culture - A Natural State of Psychopathy? by Laura
Inner Landscape of the Psychopath
- Hervey Cleckley
a chapter from Hervey M. Cleckley's classic study of psychopaths,
The Mask of Sanity
Psychopaths View Their World
from Zaca - (3 files)
Strange, New Age Grifter or COINTELPRO?
Strange" - Psychotherapist or Hacker and Thief?
am the webmaster for Zecharia Sitchin..."
Psychopath As Physician The Mask of Sanity -
Hervey Cleckley - Excerpts
Bad Seed: The Fledgling Psychopath
In-Depth Look At Where Sam Vaknin is Leading NPD
Ambassador of Narcissism: An Interview with Sam Vaknin
Soul With No Footprints
Personality, Sociopathy, and Psychopathy
of Malignant Narcissim
Socially Adept Psychopath
Origins of Violence: Is Psychopathy an Adaptation?
isn't a moron, he's a cunning sociopath
with Cassiopaea by Laura Knight-Jadczyk
and Laura's Correspondence 1997 (8 files) Supplement
Comments on Adventures With Cassiopaea
Mirror On The Wall - Quantum Future School
Wiley's subsequent letters to the public
"Alvin Wiley" correspondence (10 files)
from Readers About Jay Weidner
Webmaster: - (2 files)
is Laura Hiding? The Cassiopaeans Answer
Comments on "Is Laura Hiding Something?"
of direct channeling via "Frank Scott" on
computer, July 22, 1994
by Terry and Jan Rodemerk
Most's post to the Cassiopaea Guestbook
Portals: The Other Race Quantum Future School (2 files)
Bridges, Jay Weidner: Magickal Mystery Tour Scam
Cassiopaea a Cult?
French Connection by Laura Knight-Jadczyk Censored!
of Sanity by Hervey Cleckley PDF - book download FREE!
Psychopaths Society and Human Nature in the Films of Stanley Kubrick
common problem with psychopaths... “Is they don’t see a problem with their
can’t understand this, but the psychopath really does suck the life out
of a caring person. I try to think of them now as a slimy suckerfish right
out of the swamp, vacuum-lips out and prowling for someone vibrant and
attractive to con and eviscerate.”
are a good person you will
meet many evil people in your life, you need to recognize them and
their actions. More importantly you need to recognize which evil behaviors
you have been conned into accepting as reasonable and to reject those
behaviors - both in yourself and in others - as unacceptable.
language has a variety of terms for psychopaths, of which "bastard"
is perhaps the most polite. They
have always been with us, and despite their corrosiveness and rejection
of social mores, they show no signs of going away.
you can spot one? Think again. In general, psychopaths aren’t the product
of broken homes or the casualties of a materialistic society. Rather they
come from all walks of life and there is little evidence that their upbringing
of the two million psychopaths in North America aren’t murderers. They’re
our friends, lovers and co-workers. They’re outgoing and persuasive,
dazzling you with charm and flattery. Often you aren’t even aware they’ve
taken you for a ride – until it’s too late.
problem of plausible
lies is the most serious problem facing humanity today....Most good
people are only aware of the least intelligent part of the evil distribution;
those are the people who are obviously evil: criminals. The
normal and intelligent ends of the evil distribution totally escape
most good people's understanding.
as of late, with all the Enron scandals and related crimes, people are
waking up to the fact that the most dangerous psychopath of all is the
educated, socially adept psychopath, in fact, Dr. Hare recently said
that he would probably be able to find many psychopaths involved in
the stockmarket. It is time for American to "wake up" says Dr. Wolman,
because we are being threatened by a serious epidemic of psychopathy.
Psychopathic or Sociopathic Personality
on twenty-five years of groundbreaking research, WITHOUT
CONSCIENCE is a fascinating journey into the minds of these dangerous
individuals. Are they born unable to feel empathy, or are they created
by circumstance? How and why do they get away with cheating, conning,
and murdering? Are they mad or simply bad? In what Dr. Hare calls our
"camouflage society," how can we recognize and steer clear of these
CONSCIENCE explores their shocking patterns- and exposes one
of the most frightening, often-hidden social problems affecting our
Psychopath is much more successful than you and I because he is not
hemmed in by all sorts of impediments or worries.
discussion with Adolf Guggenbuhl-Craig & James Hillman
fall prey to the seduction, it is irresistible. Then the nightmare of
horror begins. The shabby treatment, the avoidance. I couldn’t believe
it was happening to me. He had been so sincere, so kind. It was Jekyl
go for the strongest and the best, but preferably those who are something
of rebels within the group...the LEAST controllable. Because if they can
crush them, they crush most of the rest at the same time. If they start
at the bottom, with the weakest, it’s a long way to work their way up…The
ideal target is therefore, strong, smart, rebellious and vulnerable
through previous abuse.”
favored technique is to debilitate your identity [personally, I hate the
term self-esteem] by levelling false accusations and/or questioning your
honesty, fidelity, trustworthiness, your “true” motivations, your “real”
character, your sanity and judgement.”
are absolutely the world’s best manipulators, liars, and fabricators of
truth. They do so convincingly because they believe their own lies. After
all their life is nothing but a lie, a sham, how can we possibly assume
they know anything different.”
around me would get so tired of the whole thing and insinuate that I was
perpetuating things. All I wanted was for him to leave me alone. Part
of the hurt and damage was done because others could but would not see
what was actually happening. He would always try to ingratiate himself
to others it was sickening. Usually psychopaths put on the nicest act,
and you look like the harpy and bitch, and so everyone takes their side,
it is a horror story, a psychopath can be very charming, and manipulative
and manipulate the smartest of people.”
biggest frustration and source of anger, is at those who have refused
to take a stand when they see the abuse . No matter how outrageous his
behavior others often stood by and inadvertently fuelled his grandiosity
and denial... although denial is too mild a word for it.
a psychopath throws the “bad childhood” stuff at you, keep in mind he
might be trying to get sympathy and make an excuse for his atrocious behavior
towards you and/or others. If we let these people make us feel sorry for
them, we ultimately end up in the submissive position again...just what
they want. I can “pity” them yes...but I refuse to shed another tear over
the tragedies suffered by who is now, only a shell of a person.”
a psychopath: Considering a longitudinal section of his life ...it is
hard to avoid the conclusion that here is the product of true madness
- of madness in a sense quite as real as that conveyed to the imaginative
layman by the terrible word lunatic.
the further consideration that all this skein of apparent madness has
been woven by a person of (technically) unimpaired and superior intellectual
powers and universally regarded as sane, the surmise intrudes that we
are confronted by a serious and unusual type of genuine abnormality.
Not merely a surmise but a strong conviction may arise that this apparent
sanity is, in some important respects, a sanity in name only. We find
instead a spectacle that suggests madness in excelsis, despite the absence
of all those symptoms that enable us, in some degree, to account for
irrational conduct in the psychotic.
very slowly and by a complex estimation or judgment based on multitudinous
small impressions does the conviction come upon us that, despite these
intact rational processes, these normal emotional affirmations, and
their consistent application in all directions, we are dealing here
not with a complete man at all but with something that suggests a subtly
constructed reflex machine which can mimic the human personality perfectly.
perfect is this reproduction of a whole and normal man that no one who
examines him in a clinical setting can point out in scientific or objective
terms why, or how, he is not real. And yet we eventually come to know
or feel we know that reality, in the sense of full, healthy experiencing
of life, is not here.
is hard because of all that goes along with the going. It is not just
the person you have to give up but your hopes and dreams and fantasies.
It only happened for me in increments and I cried UNCLE often thinking
if I gave it one more go I’d break through. It wasn’t until I really knew
that no matter what I said or did or didn’t do this person could never
love me or anyone.”
fantasy was exactly that, a FANTASY, that he created for himself, and
presented to me as reality. My head said the fantasy wasn’t valid. I kept
reminding myself: if the fantasy was real, I wouldn’t be treated like
dirt, and feel like shit!”
have finally come to the conclusion that they cannot change, so all we
can do is to refuse to participate in their sick drama and leave the stage.”
[T]he familiar tendency to disintegrate, against which life evolves,
may be regarded as fundamental and comparable to gravity. The climbing
man or animal must use force and purpose to ascend or to maintain himself
at a given height. [...] Whether regression occurs primarily through
something like gravity or through impulses more self-contained, the
backward movement (or ebbing) is likely to prompt many sorts of secondary
reactions, including behavior not adapted for ordinary human purposes
but instead, for functioning in the other direction. The modes of
such reactivity may vary, may fall into complex patterns, and may seek
elaborate expression. [...] People with all the outer mechanisms of
adaptation intact might, one would think, regress more complexly. [...]
In a movement (or gravitational drift) from levels where life is vigorous
and full to those where it is less so, the tactics of withdrawal predominate.
[...] The psychopath as we conceive of him in such an interpretation
seems to justify the high estimate of his technical abilities as we
see them expressed in reverse movement.
Portals: The Answer to Psychopathy?
reaction machines" in human form describes individuals with Anti-Social
Personality Disorder (APD), Sociopaths, and Psychopaths.
material presented in the linked articles does not necessarily reflect
the views or opinions of the editors. Research on your own and if you
can validate any of the articles, or if you discover deception and/or
an obvious agenda, we will appreciate if you drop us a line! We often
post such comments along with the article synopses for the benefit of
other readers. As always, Caveat Lector!
Is Truth Defamatory?
has come to our attention here at QFG that Vincent Bridges, the subject
of an investigative article on this site, in true psychopathic fashion, has announced his intention to sue Perseus
Foundation which is totally uninvolved with this research. The research was conducted by a loose group of individuals who banded together to form the Quantum Future School. Actually, his implied intentions are to sue Laura, specifically,
assuming and declaring (erroneously, as it happens), that she is the one
who did all the research and wrote the article.
his remarks, Mr. Bridges states, again erroneously, that he can sue for "defamation"
because "in defamation actions, the truth or falsehood of the defamation
is not the issue."
it happens, defamation is a legal term that is the "set" of
which libel and slander are the subset. In order for something to be proved
defamatory, it must be proven that it is either libel or slander FIRST.
And to prove that it is libel or slander, one must first prove that it
IS NOT DEFAMATION The following is where defamation does not occur:
properly worded and identified as such, are not defamatory. It's called
Statements that lack any of the three required elements: 1) they are
true 2) they are not communicated to a third person 3) they do not damage
character or reputation.
other words, whether a statement is TRUE or NOT is the very crux of defamation.
In other words, the court will FIRST inquire as to whether the statement
itself is sufficiently factual to be susceptible of being proved true
or false. See Partington v. Bugliosi, 56 F.3d 1147, 1153 (9th Cir.'94)
(applying three-factor test as the starting point for analysis); Unelko
Corp. v. Rooney, 912 F.2d 1049, 1053 (9th Cir.'90), cert. denied, 499
U.S. 961 (1991).
have offered a free venue for Mr. Bridges to post his bona fides. We have
acted in good faith and with due diligence. The simplest response would
be for him to provide evidence that his many claims are true and that
those who have refuted them are lying. And, as we noted, we double checked,
and provided each of them with Mr. Bridges full statement so that
they would be responding solely to Mr. Bridges' own claims rather than any
presentation of facts in a "biased and skewed manner," as Mr.
Bridges has claimed.
Bridges complains that we "did NOT do a very good job of researching
my past, they did a very selective one with a specific result in mind."
We would like to ask: how can it be selective if each of his claims was
addressed on the premise that it was true, and it was his own words we
used in the requests for information? Is Mr. Bridges saying that his words
were "selective and had a specific result in mind?"
in his claim that we have spent the past few weeks "tracking and
confusing people into saying they never heard of me," Mr. Bridges insults
the intelligence of Professors, Editors, Doctors and other professionals.
We repeat: at all times a full account was sent to all parties of Mr.
Bridges' total life story and claims. There was no confusion whatsoever.
Everything was and is crystal clear - except to Mr. Bridges, who still hasn't
understood that his own statements are, and continue to be, true libel
than directly addressing the issue, or producing his proofs, Mr. Bridges
has claimed that there are "several pending lawsuits" against
Ark and Laura for "breach of contract on Noah, the liability suit
on the conference and arising from that the defamation of character action." [NOTE: None of this has ever materialized].
should like to point out that, first of all, there was never any contract
with Mr. Bridges regarding any publishing, nor was there any finalized agreement
about his conference. He has claimed a "verbal agreement." This
verbal agreement was tentative, and was based on certain condtions being
met, and Mr. Bridges failed to meet those conditions. We obtained legal counsel
and were instructed to set a date for compliance. Mr. Bridges was notified
in writing, Mr. Bridges defaulted, thereby ending any "contractural
agreement" of any kind by his own actions - or rather, failure to
act. And since, we are discussing legalities, according to the agreement,
the conference was only agreed upon as a venue to introduce published
matter. That "verbal agreement" also ended with the default
of the book publishing agreement by Mr. Bridges himself. We invite him to
spend his great wealth on frivolous lawsuits as it will give us the perfect
venue to establish many things in a legal setting. In fact, we might even
produce a "class action" response. So far as we can see, only
his close associates ever end up being sued, and Mr. Bridges always manages
to remain on the sidelines. Anyone who is a close associate ought to look
carefully to what they are "motivated" to say or do on Mr. Bridges
it happens, we are aware of a deposition, a sworn legal statement of evidence
of "extreme bad faith, misdirection, and willful, vicious fraud and
disparagement" on the part of Mr. Bridges in his dealings with others.
example: Mr. Bridges, taking up a "ready made" accusation against
us that we are "paranoid and vindictive" in the publication
of the article about his references, seems to have forgotten the following
items regarding the copyrighted Cassiopaean material which Mr."Vincent
Bridges" was apparently sharing illegally after we had informed him that
he was requested to return our CD of unpublished material. Any permission
he may have inferred (because such permission was NOT given, and was specifically
denied) to publish our unpublished material, by his possession of same
was denied, revoked, officially cancelled, etc. Nevertheless, there is
sufficient cause to believe that he conspired with others to act illegally
against us and the Berne Copyright Convention. More than that, there is
sufficient evidence of a conspiracy to violate privacy, to defame, to
libel, to slander, that it will be of great value to get all parties in
court, under oath, regarding these matters. We have already received the
documents from Yahoo's legal department, signing of which will put in
motion their tracking and investigation of messages and sources.
Date: Sun Oct 21, 2001 7:11 pm
another little thought. You can use the open source Napster software
to "share" the outlawed C transcripts and all the posts on
the C list!
charter officers of the PAC have been selected and they are Storm
Bear Williams; President/Treasurer, "Vincent Bridges"; Vice- President
and Bill Stewart will serve as PAC Secretary."]
Date: Sun Oct 21, 2001 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: [matrioshka] Arkster
can I get the outlawed C transcripts. I love it when truth and freedom
of thought is censored, it gets me curious ..... andrew hennessey
<burnst@u...> ( Dr. Teresa Burns, University
of Wisconsin at Platteville)
Date: Tue Nov 13, 2001 11:29 am
Subject: Re: Alleged Petty Tyrants
(If I remember
the words right, and if I remember the date, it was 9-1 Message 13534.
Or actually, did I get that from the complete archives, now available
with the complete transcripts at an Austrian napster-esque site? L'ark, could people be circulating and downloading all of those as you
speak? Or could you have been smart enough to copy-protect that CD?
Could this all be a joke?):
may like to answer those questions under oath. We do hope that Mr. Bridges
provides that opportunity at his expense. To bring suit for defamation
of character the plaintiff in this case at least, must be willing to permit
his life to be revealed as an open book.
as he continues to claim that the Perseus Foundation is "presenting
lies and innuendo as facts based upon fraudulent and misleading "research"
... as it demonstrates malice and forethought in the creation of their
defamatory libel. And that is just what they have done," he continues
the process of his own libel and defamation against us, because, as it
happens, we can call the witnesses to prove it is false. We will also
continue to forward his claims to those very witnesses whose intelligence
he is insulting by claiming they were "confused" or "misled."
far more interesting result of our article about Mr. "Vincent Bridges" has
been the communications we have received from others who have experienced
the EXACT same thing. The general trend of the story is that an individual
who is working to bridge the gap betwen science and mysticism, and to
draw rational and realistic attention to the Matrix manipulations is targeted
and they receive communication from someone who then goes on to con them
into thinking they are friends. The use of friendship and emotional triggers
to forestall due diligence is the first step.
stories center around the obvious brilliance of the perpetrator, the intricate
body of claims, which in due course are uncovered as pathological lying
of the most extreme and unfathomable kind.
targeted individual is taken in by seeming kindness and sheer brilliance.
Correspondence ensues about those subjects that are dear to the heart
of the researcher. Phone calls are soon being exchanged to further discuss
the research. As one correspondent noted, these are some of the greatest
conversations ever. Next, the personal visits begin and a building of
a business relationship that ultimately leads to contracts and choices
by the target that lead them to quit high-paying jobs and making arrangements
to become even more involved in the life of the perpetrator.
next part of the manipulation is to "wind up" the target by
making them believe that the association is causing the perpetrator to
"catch a lot of 'heat' from spooky agencies as well as 'magickal'
groups. They describe being stalked, having their computers hacked, suffering
all kinds of attacks because they are acting for "the good of mankind,"
even if in their dark past, they did get close to the pit. Naturally,
they were appalled by their "close call," and that is why they
are so knowledgable about such things, even if they have decided to use
their knowledge "for the good!"
as our own experience shows, and is now confirmed by the identical experience
of others, the moment the target resists, the stalker "snaps"
and behaves like a "dog with rabies," as it was charmingly put.
They turn on the target and become incredibly cruel and vicious, falsely
accusing the target "slander and playing sick games." As it
happens, in our own case as well as these other incidents, the stalker
accuses the victim of essentially everything he/she is doing!
the theory that is being proposed among those who have been victimized
by this sort of scenario and who are now communicating, is this: (keep
in mind that this is just a theory at the moment and that we are gathering
more info daily) that there are "Stalkers" who are being used
by the Matrix Control System to round up people who publicly discuss interdimensional
physics and hyperdimensional realities. The theory continues that, once
they have the people who are getting close to the truth in their "stable,"
they are then programmed to self destruct in a distasteful way, so as
to shed on all their associates the same kind of discredit and air of
fraud that they, themselves, perpetrate, thereby tainting and making unsavory
for free discussion the topic of interdimensional physics, hyperdimensional
realities, and other Matrix busting ideas and technology.
such a theory is viable, the the conclusion from all of this is that the
Matrix Control System does NOT like what such discussions and revelations
may accomplish, and the Matrix has no compunction about destroying people's
lives to stop it - even including the lives of their "agents."
The theory further posits that it seems that people who dabble in "magick,"
in Wicca, in any kind of rituals, are particularly vulnerable to becoming
hosts for these Matrix agents, whose function is to keep the awareness
of multidimensional reality out of mass consciousness. They are unwitting
G-men, programmed to take out people who want to bridge the gap between
science and metaphysics by encouraging the kinds of discussions and explorations
that we do.
noted, we will continually update these pages.
Vincent Bridges Tells His Own Story
Vincent Bridges AKA "Dr. Strange"
New Age Grifter or COINTELPRO?
Vincent Bridges AKA "Dr. Strange"
Psychotherapist? Or Hacker and Thief?
The COINTELPRO Files: Vincent Bridges and Co. (photographic exhibit)
The Bridges - Jadczyk Correspondence
The Weidner - Jadczyk Correspondence
You are visitor number [TextCounter Fatal Error: This Page Not In Valid URI]