The Jadczyk Correspondence

“Non-victims can’t understand this, but the psychopath really does suck the life out of a caring person. I try to think of them now as a slimy suckerfish right out of the swamp, vacuum-lips out and prowling for someone vibrant and attractive to con and eviscerate.”

If you are a good person you will meet many evil people in your life, you need to recognize them and their actions. More importantly you need to recognize which evil behaviors you have been conned into accepting as reasonable and to reject those behaviors - both in yourself and in others - as unacceptable.

The English language has a variety of terms for psychopaths, of which "bastard" is perhaps the most polite. They have always been with us, and despite their corrosiveness and rejection of social mores, they show no signs of going away.

Think you can spot one? Think again. In general, psychopaths aren’t the product of broken homes or the casualties of a materialistic society. Rather they come from all walks of life and there is little evidence that their upbringing affects them.

Most of the two million psychopaths in North America aren’t murderers. They’re our friends, lovers and co-workers. They’re outgoing and persuasive, dazzling you with charm and flattery. Often you aren’t even aware they’ve taken you for a ride – until it’s too late.

The problem of plausible lies is the most serious problem facing humanity today....Most good people are only aware of the least intelligent part of the evil distribution; those are the people who are obviously evil: criminals. The normal and intelligent ends of the evil distribution totally escape most good people's understanding.

Only as of late, with all the Enron scandals and related crimes, people are waking up to the fact that the most dangerous psychopath of all is the educated, socially adept psychopath, in fact, Dr. Hare recently said that he would probably be able to find many psychopaths involved in the stockmarket. It is time for American to "wake up" says Dr. Wolman, because we are being threatened by a serious epidemic of psychopathy.

The Psychopathic or Sociopathic Personality

Based on twenty-five years of groundbreaking research, WITHOUT CONSCIENCE is a fascinating journey into the minds of these dangerous individuals. Are they born unable to feel empathy, or are they created by circumstance? How and why do they get away with cheating, conning, and murdering? Are they mad or simply bad? In what Dr. Hare calls our "camouflage society," how can we recognize and steer clear of these predatory people?

WITHOUT CONSCIENCE explores their shocking patterns- and exposes one of the most frightening, often-hidden social problems affecting our lives today.

The Psychopath is much more successful than you and I because he is not hemmed in by all sorts of impediments or worries.

A discussion with Adolf Guggenbuhl-Craig & James Hillman

“We fall prey to the seduction, it is irresistible. Then the nightmare of horror begins. The shabby treatment, the avoidance. I couldn’t believe it was happening to me. He had been so sincere, so kind. It was Jekyl and Hyde.”

“They go for the strongest and the best, but preferably those who are something of rebels within the group...the LEAST controllable. Because if they can crush them, they crush most of the rest at the same time. If they start at the bottom, with the weakest, it’s a long way to work their way up…The ideal target is therefore, strong, smart, rebellious and vulnerable through previous abuse.”

“A favored technique is to debilitate your identity [personally, I hate the term self-esteem] by levelling false accusations and/or questioning your honesty, fidelity, trustworthiness, your “true” motivations, your “real” character, your sanity and judgement.”

“They are absolutely the world’s best manipulators, liars, and fabricators of truth. They do so convincingly because they believe their own lies. After all their life is nothing but a lie, a sham, how can we possibly assume they know anything different.”

“Others around me would get so tired of the whole thing and insinuate that I was perpetuating things. All I wanted was for him to leave me alone. Part of the hurt and damage was done because others could but would not see what was actually happening. He would always try to ingratiate himself to others it was sickening. Usually psychopaths put on the nicest act, and you look like the harpy and bitch, and so everyone takes their side, it is a horror story, a psychopath can be very charming, and manipulative and manipulate the smartest of people.”

“My biggest frustration and source of anger, is at those who have refused to take a stand when they see the abuse . No matter how outrageous his behavior others often stood by and inadvertently fuelled his grandiosity and denial... although denial is too mild a word for it.

“If a psychopath throws the “bad childhood” stuff at you, keep in mind he might be trying to get sympathy and make an excuse for his atrocious behavior towards you and/or others. If we let these people make us feel sorry for them, we ultimately end up in the submissive position again...just what they want. I can “pity” them yes...but I refuse to shed another tear over the tragedies suffered by who is now, only a shell of a person.”

Regarding a psychopath: Considering a longitudinal section of his life ...it is hard to avoid the conclusion that here is the product of true madness - of madness in a sense quite as real as that conveyed to the imaginative layman by the terrible word lunatic.

With the further consideration that all this skein of apparent madness has been woven by a person of (technically) unimpaired and superior intellectual powers and universally regarded as sane, the surmise intrudes that we are confronted by a serious and unusual type of genuine abnormality.

Not merely a surmise but a strong conviction may arise that this apparent sanity is, in some important respects, a sanity in name only. We find instead a spectacle that suggests madness in excelsis, despite the absence of all those symptoms that enable us, in some degree, to account for irrational conduct in the psychotic.

Only very slowly and by a complex estimation or judgment based on multitudinous small impressions does the conviction come upon us that, despite these intact rational processes, these normal emotional affirmations, and their consistent application in all directions, we are dealing here not with a complete man at all but with something that suggests a subtly constructed reflex machine which can mimic the human personality perfectly.

So perfect is this reproduction of a whole and normal man that no one who examines him in a clinical setting can point out in scientific or objective terms why, or how, he is not real. And yet we eventually come to know or feel we know that reality, in the sense of full, healthy experiencing of life, is not here.

“Leaving is hard because of all that goes along with the going. It is not just the person you have to give up but your hopes and dreams and fantasies. It only happened for me in increments and I cried UNCLE often thinking if I gave it one more go I’d break through. It wasn’t until I really knew that no matter what I said or did or didn’t do this person could never love me or anyone.”

“The fantasy was exactly that, a FANTASY, that he created for himself, and presented to me as reality. My head said the fantasy wasn’t valid. I kept reminding myself: if the fantasy was real, I wouldn’t be treated like dirt, and feel like shit!”

“I have finally come to the conclusion that they cannot change, so all we can do is to refuse to participate in their sick drama and leave the stage.”

Cleckley: [T]he familiar tendency to disintegrate, against which life evolves, may be regarded as fundamental and comparable to gravity. The climbing man or animal must use force and purpose to ascend or to maintain himself at a given height. [...] Whether regression occurs primarily through something like gravity or through impulses more self-contained, the backward movement (or ebbing) is likely to prompt many sorts of secondary reactions, including behavior not adapted for ordinary human purposes but instead, for functioning in the other direction. The modes of such reactivity may vary, may fall into complex patterns, and may seek elaborate expression. [...] People with all the outer mechanisms of adaptation intact might, one would think, regress more complexly. [...] In a movement (or gravitational drift) from levels where life is vigorous and full to those where it is less so, the tactics of withdrawal predominate. [...] The psychopath as we conceive of him in such an interpretation seems to justify the high estimate of his technical abilities as we see them expressed in reverse movement.

Organic Portals: The Answer to Psychopathy?

"Alien reaction machines" in human form describes individuals with Anti-Social Personality Disorder (APD), Sociopaths, and Psychopaths.

The material presented in the linked articles does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors. Research on your own and if you can validate any of the articles, or if you discover deception and/or an obvious agenda, we will appreciate if you drop us a line! We often post such comments along with the article synopses for the benefit of other readers. As always, Caveat Lector!

The Bridges - Jadczyk Correspondence

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net>

To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net>

Subject: Re: A couple of comments

Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net

Date sent: Tue, 11 May 1999 21:51:56 -0400

On 11 May 99, at 18:18, Vincent & Darlene wrote:

> Wow, keeping up with you is a full time job! :)

That's what my husband says. He works pretty hard to keep me out of trouble!

> OK, I'll admit it. You have me fascinated with your approach. I don't as a

> rule have much use for channeled material. For the obvious reasons.

Yeah. Me too. But in my research on the literature, I became convinced that there were sufficient instances of "sublime" connection to warrant some experimenting with particular effort designed to avoid the corrupting factors of ego and all that. As a human being, I have an ego... but I use this in the Sufi way when channeling to "filter." It's like I can feel with my skin anything that is "icky."

>But

> the transcripts I have seen have been very rewarding, and you have a good

> handle on what I call ritual hygene.

Hey, as a hypnotherapist, I have done a couple of chrome peeling exorcisms! Not my idea of a Sunday drive!

>If you have read "Sharing the

> Secrets" then you have some idea of my opinions around the whole subject.

Yes. I have remarks written in the margins... but not too many...

> But that is my bias, and even within my own magickal and spiritual work I

> insist on controls.

ABSOLUTELY!

>If that distances me from some sources of information,

> fine. It also distances me from the pernicious effects of the lower

> astral.

My sentiments exactly!

> So far, the free-will party has had no trouble communicating with

> me. It just forces both sides to be more creative.

Well, I guess I was just sort of designed to do what I have done and what I am doing and I have stopped apologizing for being that way. The "other channelers" can't abide me because I am so picky that the source, for God's sake, be able to at least spell and use grammar correctly! I have gotten some funny hate mail from followers of Sheldon Nidle and others because of things on my site.

> But I am envious of the guidance.

I share! In fact, Ark is presently upset with me for getting attacked by the AW folks for the material which I should not have sent out... even though I EXPLAINED that it WAS asked for - sort of... I'm an Aquarian for goodness sake! Save the world and all that.

>When my partner Jay and I started this

> two years ago, we agreed that other than the contacts and experiences that

> I already had among the occult community, we would accept no help or

> guidance that wasn't first discovered by us. We wanted no helpful spooks,

> incarnate or discarnate, muddying the waters. In many ways, this rule has

> been invaluable.

I agree. And you will notice that the C's really make us work... there is NO free lunch!

>At one point we were averageing one wacko a week with

> obscure suggestions and strange travel plans. God knows what we turned

> down, but we know that our information is solid, reliable and well

> documented, while the Priory has a very poor track record. Look what has

> happened to everyone researching in the field who has been taken in by one

> informative group or the other. EVB and Martha Neyman are good examples,

> as are the authors of HBHG.

That's a BIG Ten Four!

> But if the Cs or the free-will party mean what they say, then they can,

> and have, seen the value of our approach.

Not only that, but they insist on it as far as the word "insist" applies.

The following was given just after Ark contacted me...

Q: (L) Would you care to comment, or shall we just ask our

questions?

A: Ask specific questions, as always.

Q: (L) Then let's start with some basic things. First of

all, I have had some contact with a physicist who is

interested in the material. And, because of this, I was

motivated to pick up a book I had read many years ago

about the German occupation of Poland, and there were some

very strange things said in this book, and some funny

synchronous numbers... It just seemed to be a prototype of

the present reality in global terms. My question is: is

there some synchronous implication between this contact,

the reading of this book when I was 11 years old, and the

material we have received through this source?

A: Open.

Q: (L) You have said that the Holocaust was basically a

'practice run' for the ultimate space invasion. Is this

invasion supposed to take place as an actual 'aliens

invading the planet' scenario, or...

A: Too many thought patterns at once. Step by step, please.

Q: (L) Let's boil it down. Was Hitler's agenda a practice

run for a future scenario?

A: Close. Was a "testing" of the will.

Q: (L) Whose will was being tested?

A: Yours.

Q: (L) Me specifically, or the planet?

A: Latter.

Q: (L) In terms of this scenario, is there some lesson that

we can learn about what may or may not occur through this

book I have mentioned?

A: Maybe, but suggest you learn to blend mosaic

consciousness.

Q: (L) What is mosaic consciousness?

A: Thinking in internally spherical terms, rather than using

linear "point blank" approach. The whole picture is seen

by seeing the whole scene.

Q: (L) Well, I guess that is why I guess I get into so many

thought patterns...

A: Picture yourself as being at the center of a mosaic.

Q: (L) Okay, I know what you are saying,

but I just don't think that there is any way I can DO

this!

A: Yes you can!

Q: (L) Okay. Okay. This whole situation, this Polish

connection, this German connection, the American and alien

things, the soldier/Nephilim thing, these are all

manifestations of a Realm Border Crossing, am I correct?

A: Close.

Q: (L) And some of the manifestations of a Realm Border

Crossing are that some people graduate or transition to

4th density, that their awareness changes, everything

changes, the playing field is leveled. So, what happened

in Germany was a 'practice run' but what is going to

happen is that the 'playing field' is going to be leveled,

so it will not be exactly the same scenario, is this a

correct assessment?

A: Maybe. Alright, my dear, you want the facts, so we will

give them to you, and hopefully you will comprehend. If

not now, then when necessary maybe... Fact number one:

All there is is lessons. Fact two: this is one big

school. Fact three: Timing as you perceive it, is never,

NEVER definite. Fact four: What is to happen, as you

state it, is a ways off, and will not occur until you have

reached that point on the learning cycle, and you are not

close yet. Now ponder before more facts are given!!

Q: (L) Okay, this being one infinite school, and we all seem

to be wandering around in the darkness...

A: Fact five: The learning cycle is variable, and progress

along it is determined by events and circumstances as they

unfold.

Q: (L) So, the events and circumstances of our lives,

individually and collectively, can indicate where we are

on this learning cycle? And we are asking to have things

told to us, or revealed to us about things which are, in

themselves, the necessary lessons? And it would be

virtually useless to be told about them since they must be

experienced?

A: Partly correct. If you want hints, then hints shall we

give. But, if you are looking for a "road map?,"

forgetitski!!

Q: (L) Okay, we want some hints. And Ark wants some hints,

too! He wants to know if we can invent a tool that

enhances free will?

A: No tool is needed because of facts 3, 4, and 5.

Q: (L) Ummm... So, when a person is being hypnotized and

controlled from outside, because that is the matter of

concern we were discussing earlier, they are hypnotized

and controlled until they learn to stop it?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) So, using the analogy of the pig stye, they just have

to wallow in it and suffer until they have had enough?

A: Using your analogy of the bicycle: Is there a tool which

makes it unnecessary for the child to learn how to ride

the bicycle in order to know how to ride it?!?

Q: (MM) Don't you get more free will by assimilating

knowledge?

A: Yes!! Yes!!

Q: (L) So, in other words, knowledge and awareness makes you

aware that you have free will, and also makes you aware of

what actions actually ARE acts of free will, and

therefore, when you know or suspect the difference between

the lies and deception and truth, then you are in a

position to be in control of your life?

A: Yes.

Q: (L) Ark also wants to ask... well, his problem is faith,

as he said it to me.

A: Faith comes also from knowledge, and as we have stated

before... False knowledge is worse than no knowledge at

all!!!!!

Q: (L) So, it is important to take each and every thing that

is being learned or analyzed, and take it completely apart

and dig in every direction around it, and even in related

directions, to FULLY ascertain that it is true? As C.S.

Lewis said, knowledge is like a rope... as long as you are

using it to tie up a box, it doesn't matter whether it is

perfect or not, but if you have to use it to hang over a

precipice, then it behooves you to make absolutely certain

that it is strong enough to support your weight.

A: Yes.

>What I think is truly of

> interest is that they have also used a rough and ready channeling approach

> with some very subtle backstopping and reality checking. I am more and

> more impressed with the degree of guidance.

Well, I have sent some of the private excerpts... there is a LOT of this material... I was like a kid in a candy store in the beginning, when I finally realized that "Egads! This makes sense!" But, it took TWO YEARS of sitting with "intent" and regular "cleansings" of various types before the C's came through... with a "bang" I might add. The house actually shook as though struck by a sonic boom.

> Brotherhood of Light might publish one or both versions of our book. They

> have been getting things ready for an influx of interest in Fulcanelli for

> over a year now. Dwellings is in print now, in a large deluxe edition, and

> I thought they had some backcopies of Mystery left but apparently we have

> been generating some interest.

Well, if you have an "inside line," perhaps you will ask about this "Dwellings" book because I did not see it on the site. I want it. I haven't used up my book budget for this month so I am told I can have it.

> This time time last year they had almost a

> thousands copies left of the 1986 printing. Kevin Townley, the publisher,

> is also the author of a great book, The Cube of Space, which describes the

> basic ideas of Bahiric astronomy. He's also a friend and co-conspirator of

> sorts, as is John Major Jenkins, whose book Mayan Cosmogenesis 20012 is a

> classic connection to a culture who still remembered the secret. Robert

> Lawlor joked last summer that we were starting a "mileu" of sorts. Try

> those while waiting for Fulcanelli.

Will do. Seem to be "clue based."

> Yes, I do believe you do. We just have to work out the recipe. I'm game.

One of my major concerns is the "little pitchers have big ears" syndrome. Yes, I know that "walls have ears," and that there is very little that is private, but it does seem that care is necessary and that one must not leave one's shoelaces untied!

> Yes, yes, sweet Jesus how true! I enjoyed your husband's website as much

> as I did yours. Very solid and impressive work.

Thank you most kindly. He did win the Humboldt Prize in 1995 and we are looking for a Nobel... not for it's own sake, but for the freedom it can provide. The politics of science can get VERY tedious!

>As for Dan, well the

> politest way to put it is that his ideas run away with him.

I think he could use a good exorcism.

> Now about that alchemical paragraph. . .I would dearly love to read it!

> Here's my version of the techno approach:

All those terms are "Green language," if you will, IMHO.

The first thing you need to think about to understand what I am going to say is this:

Extensive research by myself and MANY who have gone before, more qualified than myself, shows that so called "paranormal" abilities are genetic. Cases of poltergeist activity, PK, manifestation, healing, bilocation, etc can all be tracked to either an "inherited" tendency that is active, or an ability that is "turned on" by some sort of trauma, particularly electrical shock, a blow to the head, illness etc.

So called "supernormal" abilities seem to have no direct relation to "spirituality" as a necessary causative agent. A man can heal with the touch of his hands and go home, get drunk, and beat his wife.

Our bodies only utilize 2% of our DNA to code for all the proteins that make us... and a similar figure is the 5 % of our brain we use. Can these figures be related?

The other 98 % of DNA is called junk - simply because nobody knows what it is there for.

However, the fact that "paranormal" abilities can be linked to genetics makes us think that there is a LOT of DNA that could be related to such things... the question is: how to unlock it?

I believe that the presence of suppressor genes is the key. Suppressor genes "lock" DNA so that it is not active. Suppressor genes can be "baited" away so that more DNA unlocks. This can be accomplished in one of two ways: electrically stimulated changes in neurotransmitters, or hormonally stimulated changes in neurotransmitters combined with hormonal changes in membrane permeability.

So, I think the key is to find the method to generate a powerful internal electrical charge (read Reich) that is continuous for a sufficient length of time to cause an alteration in the fluids of the body - hormones which then demand variations of neurotransmitters - and to maintain this for a sufficient length of time for a "feedback loop" to be set up. (This gets technical and I can't find my notes on it.)

This is the "slow, low heat" of the alchemical work.

The whole thing is Tantra. The technique may be variable depending on the configuration of the practitioner.

> <<Thing is, the results are dependent upon the bloodline.>>

Yup. I suspect those nasty guys back then were busy finding "Merovingian" gals for their "work."

> This one line tells me that you have indeed caught the right track! The

> question lingers around the edge of all these issues. Why were so many of

> the "Priory" involved in alchemy if it was all just about a royal

> bloodline, Christ's or not? Well, I think I have an answer, and I await

> yours.

See above.

> As for EVB, well, she isn't talking to us at the moment. We do have

> indirect sources and are checking at the moment on what has happened to

> her. She wasn't answering her phone when we were in RLC in March. I'll

> keep you informed. She hasn't talked to us since we came up with the

> hypothesis that Fulcanelli and Schwaller de Lubiz are the same person. Her

> anger makes suspect we are close. See Vanderbroek's biography of

> Schwaller, Alchemie.

Okay.

TTYL,

Laura

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net>

To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net>

Subject: Re:hendaye, etc,

Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net

Date sent: Wed, 12 May 1999 19:00:10 -0400

On 11 May 99, at 9:54, Vincent & Darlene wrote:

> There are only three places in France with the old word "Luz" or light in

> their names. One is a small village between Carcassone and Couiza near

> RLC, the other is the beach town St. John-de-Luz near Hendaye and the

> third is in the Pyrenees near Lourdes. That one, Luz St Savior, was the

> logical choice for Soltane, but until we got there we had no idea if there

> was anything left to find, even if we were right.

Have been going over these notes a time or two to see what lightbulbs light up

(pun intended - and, by the way, the C's use puns a LOT)

and this was brought to mind:

07-19-97

Q: Well, that is out of my depth tonight! In a previous

session I asked a question about the 'sons of Belial' and

the 'sons of the law of One,' as explicated by Edgar

Cayce, and whether these were philosophial or racial

divisions. You said that they were initially racial, and

then philosophical and religious. Now, from putting the

information about religions together throughout the

centuries, I am coming to a rather difficult realization

that the whole monothiestic idea, which is obviously the

basic concept of the 'sons of the law of One,' is the most

clever and devious and cunning means of control I have

ever encountered in my life. No matter where it comes

from, the religionists say "we have the ONE god, WE are

his agents, you pay us your money, and we'll tell him to

be nice to you in the next world!"

A: Clever if one is deceived. Silly truffle if one is not.

Q: Well, I know! But, uncovering this decption, this lie

that the 'power' is 'out there' is unbelievable. So, the

Kantekkians were the 'Sons of Belial,' which is not the

negative thing that I interpreted it as at the time. So,

the 'Sons of the Law of One,' was perverted to the

monotheistic Judaism, which then was then transformed into

the Christian religious mythos, and has been an ongoing

theme since Atlantean times.

A: Woven of those who portray the lights.

Q: And that is always the way it has been. They appear as

'angels of light.' And, essentially, everything in

history has been rewritten by this group.

A: Under the influence of others. And whom do you suppose?

Q: Well, the Orion STS.

A: Sending pillars of light and chariots of fire to deliver

the message.

Q: Well, I found some connections between some tombs in Rome,

Nicolas Poussin, and some tombs in England, the

processions of 'angels' on the Canary Islands. The

connection seems to be these funny lights, or Candles,

with 'peculiar wicks,' as they are described, which are

'eternal flames.' I am wondering if this is what you

meant by connecting them by the frequency of light?

A: "Eternal flame" adorns the tomb of JFK. Connection?

Q: Yes. I also found the Solloi priesthood and the

priestesses called Peleiades. They seem to be involved

with urns, birds, tinkling bells, urns that can be struck

and which then set up a particular resonance in other

urns, oak trees, and some other peculiar references that

relate to laurel trees...

A: Siren song.

Q: What about the siren song?

A: Greek mythology.

Q: I know that. What about it? What do the sirens

represent?

A: Laura, my dear, if you really want to reveal "many

beautiful and amazing things," all you need to do is

remember the triad, the trilogy, the trinity, and look

always for the triplicative connecting clue profile.

Connect the threes... do not rest until you have found

three beautifully balancing meanings!!

Q: So, in everything there are three aspects?

A: And why? Because it is the realm of the three that you

occupy. In order to possess the keys to the next level,

just master the Third Man Theme, then move on with grace

and anticipation.

Q: In a previous session you also said that the Guanches were

confused by a trauma, which was why they did not have a

clear story about their origins. So, I was thinking about

it and wondering if they were actual Atlanteans, and that

the Canary Islands were an intact part of Atlantis, and

that the Guanches did not actually travel from anywhere...

they were there all along. That the Canaries is an actual

area of Atlantis that survived and that the Guanches

survived with it.

A: Close.

Q: Is there some mystery or secret about how they got there?

A: In what context?

Q: I asked before, and you said 'guess,' and I guessed the

flood of Noah, and you said 'close.' You said they were

traumatized. I just wanted to know where they came from.

They have a tradition that 60 of them arrived...

A: You are close enough to lay the foundations of your

castle.

Q: Okay. Change gears: Why is the rooster, or the crowing of

the rooster, associated with the idea of underground

cities, civilizations, or bases as well as alchemy and secret

societies?

A: What causes the rooster to crow?

Q: Light. But, how is light related to an underground city?

A: Tis not just light, but the emergence of light from the

depths of the darkness.

Just a funny little bit.

Laura

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net>

To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net>

Subject: Re:hendaye, etc,

Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net

Date sent: Wed, 12 May 1999 19:14:25 -0400

On 11 May 99, at 9:54, Vincent & Darlene wrote:

> This would appear to be reference to the 'eastern' cross,

> maltese or equal armed, of the Catherite Templars would fled with the

> Grail family into the Bearn in 1244.

04-04-98

Q: Why does the bee symbol appear repeatedly in the ancient

literature as a symbol of royalty?

A: Pollen.

Q: What about the pollen?

A: Is alchemical compound.

Q: Okay, I get the connection. In the studies of the Triple

Goddess, I came across some interesting things. You

suggested that I should research the Third Man Theme. I

have discovered that the origin of the word 'man' meant a

female - the goddess. The oldest word for the male of the

species was 'wer' as in 'werewolf.' So, the Third Man

Theme could mean actually, the Triple Goddess. Am I

correct?

A: Close, if viewed through "sheets of rain."

Q: Okay. Tracking the Triple Goddess back to the oldest

references, we get to KaliMa. There are all kinds of

derivations of this name, but the thing that strikes me is

the relationship to the goddess Kell, or Kella, as well as

to the word kell, Celts, and how this might be transformed

into the word 'Cassiopaea.' Can you comment on this?

A: Do not the Celts like "kelly" green?!?

Q: Yes. So. What does 'green' have to do with it?

A: Keep searching... learning is accomplished thusly, and

learning is fun!

Q: Yes. I know. Okay, if that is related to Celts, then it

must also relate to the Goddess 'Car' which would make the

'philosophers of Damcar' the philosophers of the Goddess

Car, the equine term for 'mother' being 'dam' not to mention the relation

to the Goddess Danae...

A: Need now to turn you research to Malta.

Q: Oh God! Alright. The three aspects of the goddess: in

the story of Perseus, there was Cassiopaea, Andromeda, and

Medusa... the three aspects, the mother, the virgin, and

the crone. But, in this story, Perseus manages to cut the

head off the crone. In other stories, the crone always

manages to win. Is there any particular reason why

Perseus cuts off the head of Medusa? Was this transposed?

Was the Medusa merely another aspect?

A: Serpentine.

Q: What about serpentine? Representative of the serpent race

or the Lizzies?

A: Eden.

Q: Was the story of Perseus the story of Eden? Was Medusa

the representative of the serpent of Eden?

A: Not quite.

Q: What are you alluding to that I am not getting? I feel

that I am out of sync with this conversation.

A: Out of sync only occurs when presupposition reigns

supreme.

Q: Well, it is not reigning supreme. The problem is: in the

oldest religions, it is the Goddess, the Mother, the

endless sea of potential of unassumed experience that was

the Goddess. There was unconditional love in the

beginning. But then, the patriarchal view twisted it and

it became violent and ugly and restrictive. And, from the

patriarchal view came the 'redeeming son' when before, it

was the redemption of the Goddess' blood. So, what I want

to know is: what happened to create the patriarchal

system? How was the Goddess suppressed?

A: All has been distorted and suppressed, so why not this?

Q: You once mentioned 'Greek Enforcers' who wrote the New

Testament. Where did these Greek Enforcers come from?

A: Order of Thelon.

Q: Never heard of it. On another occasion you called the

Nephilim 'enforcers.' Is there any relation between this

order of Thelon and the Nephilim?

A: Maybe...

Q: Where is the headquarters of this group?

A: Sicinthos.

Q: Is that a place? Never heard of it.

A: Yes.

Q: Okay. Next question: the White Mare Goddess image that

prefigured the Omega symbol, what is this related to?

A: Transcends.

Q: The White Mare transcends something?

A: Transcendental.

Q: What is the relationship of the White Mare to the

symbolism of the knight? The knight on the horse is

repeatedly used in alchemical symbolism.

A: Rites.

Q: One of the rites in question is that the making of the

knight involves touching both shoulders with the end of a

sword which is actually a symbolic beheading. Why is the

knight symbolically beheaded?

A: Blast open limitations of encasing spirit in body.

06-20-98

Q: Was this figure the fertility god of the Hoggar region?

A: Better study more material relating to Mediterranean

region, particularly Malta.

Q: Okay, that is at least the third time you have brought up

Malta. I will look for something on Malta.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk <lark2@ozline.net>

To: Vincent & Darlene <abooks@ac.net>

Subject: Where is Arcadia? Thru the Labyrinth by the Lake?

Send reply to: lark2@ozline.net

Date sent: Thu, 13 May 1999 09:35:00 -0400

Hi,

I was reading over the "cut and paste" segments and found an error in

transcription. Had to check back to find out WHY I made such an error... and

my only excuse is that, after all these years of sitting there with headphones

on and typing, my mind tends to wander and I just typed in part of what I was

thinking and NOT what I was hearing.

So, the segment was sent thus:

Correction will follow.

Q: (L) Okay, meanwhile back at Rennes-le-Chateau, there are these three priests

and a bishop who have more money than they ought to have. Clearly, there is

something going on there. My thought is, after analyzing it is, the purported

'parchments' found in the column of the altar in the church there, were never

really found, that they and the purported code were both made up as a clever

fraud; the whole thing was made up, yet there IS a mystery there. I also think

that the connecting of the Shepherds of Arcadia painting to that church, that

area of France, is fraudulent also. The smokescreen is being focused there to

keep it from being directed elsewhere. Am I on the right track here?

A: Well, quite simply we would say, where is Arcadia?

Q: (L) Arcadia was Turkey. You have made many references to Turkey, to Troy,

which was located in what is not Turkey. A lot of funny stuff tracks back

there. And, Troy means 'three.' Interesting.

A: Tis a clue for you, not a destination!

Correction:

Q: (L) Arcadia was in Greece. [leap in thought] You have made many references

to Turkey, to Troy, which was located in what is now Turkey. A lot of funny

stuff tracks back there. And, Troy means 'three.' Interesting.

A: Tis a clue for you, not a destination!

The "leap in thought" connection that was not explicated is the fact that

Arcadia was, in legend, the "creation" of the Perseid Dynasty which was usurped

by Agamenon, the husband of Helen. Legends say that a remnant of the Perseid

family fled to Troy. Other legends say they just "disappeared" or were

"snuffed."

Mycenaea, the traditional "Arcadia," was "the place of the mushroom,"

supposedly named so because the hilt of Perseus sword fell off there and it was

taken as a omen of the location to build the city. This "cap" had the

appearance of a mushroom.

I don't believe that story for a minute, but it is the "going explanation."

However, the Canary Islands search that I was directed to by the C's produced

most interesting results....

These are just pastes of notes and relevant session material. No special

order, but I think you will get a "handl" on it!

Says here: "The story, according to my well-read

informant, was something of a badly kept secret, but all

the documentation was available for anyone with patience

enough to page through reams of late 15th century

documents, all handwritten in stylized, archaic Castillian

and church Latin, at the Barcelona archives. In any case,

the account concerns Christopher Columbus and his stay at

the governor's mansion in Gran Canaria.

"Being a true Renaissance scholar, the Genoese navigator

studied all available information about the possibility of

a transoceanic expedition. Some of that information

included the traditions of earlier seafaring peoples, such

as the Vikings, who sailed into the distant West. Most

historians believe he knew of the sea routs taken by Leif

Ericson, Thorfinn Karlsefni and other Scandinavian seamen,

but he rejected a northern crossing when he found a

dolonial report made shortly after the Spanish subjugation

of Gran Canaria.

"In the military report, a Buanche chief named Tirajana

claimed that his ancestors were far greater sailors than

the Spaniards, because they traveled regularly to the end

of the ocean, over the horizon of the sunset to a great

land. Although the Spanish officer who wrote the report

dismissed the Guanche chief's statment as the defiant boast

of a defeated man, Columbus felt the old native's claim

merited further investigation, and he set sail for Gran

Canaria. At the Governor's hous, arrangements were made

for a trip to the mountainous interior of the island with

an interpreter. In a few days, he reached the former

native kingdom of Tirajana, where he met with one of the

last surviving members of the Guanche royal family.

Through a Spanish translator, he repeated to Columbus the

same tradition of transatlantic voyages made by his

ancestors and told him additionally of a great underwater

stream that carried their ships directly from their island

home across the sea to the great land in the Weest. The

guanch survivor also provided stellar navigation, as

preserved in the oral tradition of a tribal song about his

ancestors, with particular reference to the Pleiades, to

the far country beyond the evening twilight.

"Convinced he had heard the truth, Columbus sailed away

with the old Guanche's information. The rest is history.

Or almost. The Tirajana contribution to his discovery was

subsequently repressed by either the Church authorities of

by Columbus himself, because he did not want to share the

glory of 1492 with anyone else.

"The jealousy with which he protected his achievements is

wll known, but the motivation of the Church is far more

credible. To admit that a heathen and a member of an

inferior race just conquered by Catholic Spain had provided

invaluable sailing directions to a Christian admiral would

have been ideologically unacceptable in the extreme.

Enterline askes quite correctly, 'What Renaissance Spanish

scholar having any political sense would give a second

thought to publshing anything detrimental to his

sovereign's claims?'

[...] "The conspiracy of silence has been maintained by the

Spanish authorities to the present day, because of the

disruptive independence movement still active in the Canary

Islands, whose radical leaders could use the story of

Tirajana as political propaganda for their separatist

cause. Such propaganda might also prove especially

effective during the 500th anniversary of Spain's discovery

of the New World, an event of poerful significance

throughout Iberis, Latin America and, indeed, the whole

civilized world.

"In any case, the story does not lack for disquieting

details that tend to confirm a Canary Island role in the

Columbus enigma that still intrigues investigators after

half a millennium. For example, the 'great underwater

stream' the native said went straight to the other side of

the ocean does indeed exist. It is the Canary Island

Current that runs from Gran Canaria to the shores of

Central America and the Bahamas, where Columbus made his

landfall. In fact his ships rode the Canary Island Current

across the Atlantic, just as the old Guanche said his

ancestors used to do long ago.

"The man sho supposedly translated for Columbus was called

De Aranya. Interestingly, a Diego de Aranya DID sail on

the Santa Maria to 'New Spain,' where he was employed with

success as an interpreter and eventually promoted to

Alguazil of the Fleet. Today, the colonial town of De

Aranya lies within the former Guanche kingdom of Tirajana.

"Born in Cordoba, Diego de Aranya settled on land purchased

in Gran Canaria, where he mastered the native language and

translated the deposed native chief's transatlantic sailing

instructions for Columbus. Diego died in a massacre of

about 40 other Spaniards on the island of Espanola. He was

survived by his cousin, Pedro, who captained a ship on the

third voyage from Spain to the New World and retired to

Gran Canaria's Tirajana.

"Columbus' wife, Beatrix Enriquez' maiden name was de

Aranya.

[...]

"The logbook of the admiral's first voyage to 'New Spain'

is full or cryptic references to the Canary Islands.

[...]

"Evidence for pre-Columbian visits from bearded white men

is not confined to native accounts. Significantly, some of

that evidence identifies a distinct Canary Island presence