“Non-victims can’t understand this, but the psychopath really does suck the life out of a caring person. I try to think of them now as a slimy suckerfish right out of the swamp, vacuum-lips out and prowling for someone vibrant and attractive to con and eviscerate.”

If you are a good person you will meet many evil people in your life, you need to recognize them and their actions. More importantly you need to recognize which evil behaviors you have been conned into accepting as reasonable and to reject those behaviors - both in yourself and in others - as unacceptable.

The English language has a variety of terms for psychopaths, of which "bastard" is perhaps the most polite. They have always been with us, and despite their corrosiveness and rejection of social mores, they show no signs of going away.

Think you can spot one? Think again. In general, psychopaths aren’t the product of broken homes or the casualties of a materialistic society. Rather they come from all walks of life and there is little evidence that their upbringing affects them.

Most of the two million psychopaths in North America aren’t murderers. They’re our friends, lovers and co-workers. They’re outgoing and persuasive, dazzling you with charm and flattery. Often you aren’t even aware they’ve taken you for a ride – until it’s too late.

The problem of plausible lies is the most serious problem facing humanity today....Most good people are only aware of the least intelligent part of the evil distribution; those are the people who are obviously evil: criminals. The normal and intelligent ends of the evil distribution totally escape most good people's understanding.

Only as of late, with all the Enron scandals and related crimes, people are waking up to the fact that the most dangerous psychopath of all is the educated, socially adept psychopath, in fact, Dr. Hare recently said that he would probably be able to find many psychopaths involved in the stockmarket. It is time for American to "wake up" says Dr. Wolman, because we are being threatened by a serious epidemic of psychopathy.

The Psychopathic or Sociopathic Personality

Based on twenty-five years of groundbreaking research, WITHOUT CONSCIENCE is a fascinating journey into the minds of these dangerous individuals. Are they born unable to feel empathy, or are they created by circumstance? How and why do they get away with cheating, conning, and murdering? Are they mad or simply bad? In what Dr. Hare calls our "camouflage society," how can we recognize and steer clear of these predatory people?

WITHOUT CONSCIENCE explores their shocking patterns- and exposes one of the most frightening, often-hidden social problems affecting our lives today.

The Psychopath is much more successful than you and I because he is not hemmed in by all sorts of impediments or worries.

A discussion with Adolf Guggenbuhl-Craig & James Hillman

“We fall prey to the seduction, it is irresistible. Then the nightmare of horror begins. The shabby treatment, the avoidance. I couldn’t believe it was happening to me. He had been so sincere, so kind. It was Jekyl and Hyde.”

“They go for the strongest and the best, but preferably those who are something of rebels within the group...the LEAST controllable. Because if they can crush them, they crush most of the rest at the same time. If they start at the bottom, with the weakest, it’s a long way to work their way up…The ideal target is therefore, strong, smart, rebellious and vulnerable through previous abuse.”

“A favored technique is to debilitate your identity [personally, I hate the term self-esteem] by levelling false accusations and/or questioning your honesty, fidelity, trustworthiness, your “true” motivations, your “real” character, your sanity and judgement.”

“They are absolutely the world’s best manipulators, liars, and fabricators of truth. They do so convincingly because they believe their own lies. After all their life is nothing but a lie, a sham, how can we possibly assume they know anything different.”

“Others around me would get so tired of the whole thing and insinuate that I was perpetuating things. All I wanted was for him to leave me alone. Part of the hurt and damage was done because others could but would not see what was actually happening. He would always try to ingratiate himself to others it was sickening. Usually psychopaths put on the nicest act, and you look like the harpy and bitch, and so everyone takes their side, it is a horror story, a psychopath can be very charming, and manipulative and manipulate the smartest of people.”

“My biggest frustration and source of anger, is at those who have refused to take a stand when they see the abuse . No matter how outrageous his behavior others often stood by and inadvertently fuelled his grandiosity and denial... although denial is too mild a word for it.

“If a psychopath throws the “bad childhood” stuff at you, keep in mind he might be trying to get sympathy and make an excuse for his atrocious behavior towards you and/or others. If we let these people make us feel sorry for them, we ultimately end up in the submissive position again...just what they want. I can “pity” them yes...but I refuse to shed another tear over the tragedies suffered by who is now, only a shell of a person.”

Regarding a psychopath: Considering a longitudinal section of his life ...it is hard to avoid the conclusion that here is the product of true madness - of madness in a sense quite as real as that conveyed to the imaginative layman by the terrible word lunatic.

With the further consideration that all this skein of apparent madness has been woven by a person of (technically) unimpaired and superior intellectual powers and universally regarded as sane, the surmise intrudes that we are confronted by a serious and unusual type of genuine abnormality.

Not merely a surmise but a strong conviction may arise that this apparent sanity is, in some important respects, a sanity in name only. We find instead a spectacle that suggests madness in excelsis, despite the absence of all those symptoms that enable us, in some degree, to account for irrational conduct in the psychotic.

Only very slowly and by a complex estimation or judgment based on multitudinous small impressions does the conviction come upon us that, despite these intact rational processes, these normal emotional affirmations, and their consistent application in all directions, we are dealing here not with a complete man at all but with something that suggests a subtly constructed reflex machine which can mimic the human personality perfectly.

So perfect is this reproduction of a whole and normal man that no one who examines him in a clinical setting can point out in scientific or objective terms why, or how, he is not real. And yet we eventually come to know or feel we know that reality, in the sense of full, healthy experiencing of life, is not here.

“Leaving is hard because of all that goes along with the going. It is not just the person you have to give up but your hopes and dreams and fantasies. It only happened for me in increments and I cried UNCLE often thinking if I gave it one more go I’d break through. It wasn’t until I really knew that no matter what I said or did or didn’t do this person could never love me or anyone.”

“The fantasy was exactly that, a FANTASY, that he created for himself, and presented to me as reality. My head said the fantasy wasn’t valid. I kept reminding myself: if the fantasy was real, I wouldn’t be treated like dirt, and feel like shit!”

“I have finally come to the conclusion that they cannot change, so all we can do is to refuse to participate in their sick drama and leave the stage.”

Cleckley: [T]he familiar tendency to disintegrate, against which life evolves, may be regarded as fundamental and comparable to gravity. The climbing man or animal must use force and purpose to ascend or to maintain himself at a given height. [...] Whether regression occurs primarily through something like gravity or through impulses more self-contained, the backward movement (or ebbing) is likely to prompt many sorts of secondary reactions, including behavior not adapted for ordinary human purposes but instead, for functioning in the other direction. The modes of such reactivity may vary, may fall into complex patterns, and may seek elaborate expression. [...] People with all the outer mechanisms of adaptation intact might, one would think, regress more complexly. [...] In a movement (or gravitational drift) from levels where life is vigorous and full to those where it is less so, the tactics of withdrawal predominate. [...] The psychopath as we conceive of him in such an interpretation seems to justify the high estimate of his technical abilities as we see them expressed in reverse movement.

Organic Portals: The Answer to Psychopathy?

"Alien reaction machines" in human form describes individuals with Anti-Social Personality Disorder (APD), Sociopaths, and Psychopaths.

The material presented in the linked articles does not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors. Research on your own and if you can validate any of the articles, or if you discover deception and/or an obvious agenda, we will appreciate if you drop us a line! We often post such comments along with the article synopses for the benefit of other readers. As always, Caveat Lector!

The Jadczyk - Weidner Correspondence

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea>
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: DM
Send reply to: laura@cassiopaea
Date sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:05:42 -0500

On 4 Jan 2002, at 11:29, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> I am interested in something you said. The counterfeit tradition started
> with the Rosicrucians and Masons and later became the Illuminati and then the
> Theosophists, Crowley and the rest. Are you saying that the Illuminati is not
> behind Communism? Wieshaupt certainly started the movement. Where are you
> getting this? Marx was an 'Illumined One' as was Hegel and Engels. Why do you
> think England let Marx live there? You are wrong. All modern systems come from
> the counterfeit tradition. Naziism, Communism, Fascism, Theory of Relativity,
> Evolution, all have their base in the counterfeit tradition.

Hi, Don't read things into what I said that aren't there. I said "it's an old saw." In other words, it is hauled out as a diversionary bugaboo when the real issue is (and was) in the other direction.

Anyway, I am continuing to read, switching between Guenon and Schwaller. I can show you where Schwaller "steals" from Guenon, and leads off in that direction and then does the subtle switcheroo.

C's, Fulcanelli, Guenon, and others are in one camp, Schwaller is firmly in another.

Did you ever get Babel and read it?

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: Guenon vs Schwaller
Date sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 12:13:43 -0500

On 4 Jan 2002, at 11:35, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> I am so happy that you are reading Guenon. He is the one we should be
> talking about. Yes, compared to his fellow student Schwaller Guenon shone like
> a bright light. He was clearly Fulcanelli's greatest accomplishment aside from
> completing the Great Work. But he had a mission that was much different than
> Schwaller. Guenon was to be the attack dog because of his great gifts of
> insight and articulation.

No, I'm telling you... looking at this now, as I am with a different approach, I am seeing SO CLEARLY that Schwaller is the anti-tradition.

Sheesh! Reading Guenon is like fresh air. And later, when I have more time, I will show you point-counter-point exactly what I am finding... right there in Schwaller's own words!!!! It's so amazing that I would not have believed it.

>
> Schwaller was doing some kind of deep research that required him to look like
> the counterfeit tradition. It is the Hall of Mirrors.

I think that he wasn't just "supposed" to look like the counterfeit tradition, he IS it... He sure stole freely from Guenon. But as it happened, the book I picked up had the very paragraphs by Guenon that Schwaller grabbed... and I was just stunned to read it, and then to see how he TWISTED it. He did NOT get it!

>
> Both ended up in Egypt, both were highly influenced by Sufis . Whether they
> accomplished the Great Work - who knows? Al Kemi sounds like Schwaller trying
> to throw everyone off track before he goes. Guenon disappeared completely right
> before he died.

Well, I already have a whole raft of stuff in Noah about this stuff... and Noah is sort of like a modern day Guenon with a lot added, but I didn't realize that until I was reading this particular book (which I ordered the other day when you mentioned him). But, it is very satisfying ... and I guess I just sort of accidentally ordered the one that would reveal Schwaller, though on the day I did it I was not even thinking about Schwaller.

> If you are reading Guenon then there is great hope in this world.
>

Of course there is. We are agreed on all the important points, and you even agree on the "externals" of my view of Schwaller... and maybe the fact is that he was inside what he is outside.

And the story about the Sufi does not suggest to me that he was aligned with them. Knowing how Sufi's operate, the guy probably sent him on a wild goose chase.

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:25:16 EST
Subject: Re: Guenon vs Schwaller
To: laura@cassiopaea

I am willing to listen to what you have found.

I have no doubt that Schwaller stole from Guenon. If you wrote like Schwaller you would be jealous of someone with Guenon's ability also. Theft is the greatest compliment. I know. I have had my work stolen also.

Jay

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 15:27:34 EST
Subject: Re: DM
To: laura@cassiopaea

I have it and just haven't had the time yet. But it does look interesting.

Did you ever find out if VB has a business called Aeytheria Books. I am seeing a lawyer next week and I am trying to decide which entity to sue.

PS - Which Guenon are you reading? VB could never 'get' Guenon. No matter how many times he tried.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: DM
Date sent: Fri, 4 Jan 2002 17:07:15 -0500

On 4 Jan 2002, at 15:27, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> I have it and just haven't had the time yet. But it does look interesting.

Well, it makes totally clear what Fulcanelli meant by cabala and completely demolishes what Schwaller says about it applying to hieroglyphics... it is an intense little book..

>
> Did you ever find out if VB has a business called Aeytheria Books. I am
> seeing a lawyer next week and I am trying to decide which entity to sue.

He does not have a business. My guess is, sue him and Darlene personally. They do not have any business registered in their county, and it is montgomery county in case you want to call the county clerk's office and check.

He is going to claim that he "owns" the material because he did all that "editorial work" and Darlene did all the illustrations.

By the way, a member of our group wrote to tell me the other day that he had put through another charge on her credit card... he is desperate for money, I think. TBurns told me that she overheard them talking about money problems when she was there... Seems that Darlene was docked three days pay from her job for failing to pass a drug test and it was a major issue. So my guess is that if you sue, you will probably win by default because he might not be able to pay an attorney to respond.

But then, I wouldn't count on anything one way or the other. He may have somebody in the wings who will give him money - in which case, prepare for a protracted struggle.

> PS - Which Guenon are you reading? VB could never 'get' Guenon. No matter how
> many times he tried.

East and West. And it alludes to some other works of his, mainly a book that rips Theosophy to shreds that I will have to get next. Guenon speaks in the same terms as C's about "higher intellect" and "strive to rise" in thinking... and Schwaller's whole schtick seems to be "let's get back to our animal nature... don't bother trying to think higher, thinking won't do it... "

I don't think that Schwaller understood that the "mind of the heart" as the Egyptians understood it was exactly the higher intellect as Guenon describes it and NOT the devolution that he ascribed to it.

And, indeed he does. He suggests that once a being has reached 3rd density thought, it's time to "go back and become one with source." The idea that there is a higher mind, intellect, world of pure abstraction seems to be simply beyond him. It's like trying to read Dan Winter's stuff.

Fulcanelli and Guenon both talk about the "higher world of thought" and Guenon seems to have nothing but contempt for "sentimentality." Of course, Schwaller tries to cover up the fact that this is exactly what he is teaching and promoting, using fancy terms etc, but he obviously never, ever really "got it."

But, anyway, I am having a good time with it - switching back and forth between Fulcanelli, Guenon, and Schwaller... think I will add a chapter to Noah that compares them and shows the difference between the true tradition and the anti- tradition.

Anyway, I had a little minor surgery done on my ear today, and I'm a little woozy just now, so I'll save any complicated thinking for later. But I do thank you for Guenon.

And you will thank me for Babel, I am sure. If you like Guenon, you will like Babel.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: DM
Date sent: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 12:06:23 -0500

On 5 Jan 2002, at 11:10, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> Read 'Reign of Quantity and the Signs of the Times. Highly recommended.
>

Will do. I am having a good time saying "Yes!!" And damned if he doesn't say SO many things in Noah - though we have written from a slightly different angle and different perspective... but in our investigations into such things as precession, Egyptian science, etc, we found SO much poppycock and so much that was constructed on big errors of earlier "scientists," (and it's so funny that in Noah I quote Irving's tongue in cheek definition of "scientism" as a cult!) that just compounded later problems, and nobody ever went back to ask the basic questions about where, when, and why a certain idea became holy writ.

Ark spent two weeks discussing precession with the world's five leading experts on the subject - at MIT, Belgium, France and some other observatory, and at the end, they all admitted that the observations were being made and collected, but they couldn't make sense of it, and it was all being collected by some gov agency like a black hole, from which no analysis or other data ever emerged.

For weeks on end, we would go to bed every night shaking our heads and saying "I can't believe it! All lies, all lies!"

I spent some time picking Egyptologist and hieroglyphics expert Anthony Spalinger's brain and had to order a long paper by him from Bielefeld in which he slyly suggested a real and reasonable date for the Rhind papyrus - and he had to do it that way, or get kicked out of his field!

I have read all of Neugebauer, which is essential to understand any claims about "Egyptian science," and then read ABOUT Neugebauer to try and determine his agenda. The egyptologists hated his findings, so he must have been onto something! All of this is included in Noah...

In the end, I came to the conclusion that if the Titanic had been hired for a convention of Egyptologists, it would have been a good start!

Have you read our work on the Bible? I didn't realize it would become so popular. It is 6 chapters of Noah, from later in the book, and we are finding that people are talking about it in a very positive way. Because, yes, we did our homework...

It's on the site at: http://www.cassiopaea.com/cass/biblewho1.ht

When I have a question, Ark generally manages to help me find the right experts, to provide entree to a discussion, and I can pick their brains with my simple questions. It's almost comical sometimes to see them squirm when I just keep repeating:" but that doesn't answer my question... " and I finally pin them down to admitting that they really don't have a clue.

My objective is to peel away layer after layer after layer ... going back thousands and thousands of years - in all different fields where the clues are found. And the more I discover that is hidden, the more I see Fulcanelli's brilliance and the muddiness of Schwaller.

And just keep in mind that the suggestions for where to look came from C's, though we have had to find the answers ourselves. They don't make it easy... but that is what is unique about them. And that is also why VB never could really understand what they were saying. He hadn't done the work, so what they would say went right over his head.

Well, back to work.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: BVD
Date sent: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 18:23:23 -0500

On 4 Jan 2002, at 11:29, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> My friend Bill Van Doren wrote the intro. Why?

Who is he and what does he know?

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Sat, 5 Jan 2002 22:43:12 EST
Subject: Re: BVD
To: laura@cassiopaea

He is a scientist who is interested in alchemy. He is a great guy who knows everything that we know and more. However he still is caught in the 'technological miracle solution'.

He is very interested in AON and believes that it is one of the most important books that he has seen.

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: BVD
Date sent: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 07:47:22 -0500

Do you have any idea why he made the mistake he did in the first sentence of his intro to Dwellings? And why he omitted a word from the last sentence?

Can you ask him?

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 16:53:04 EST
Subject: Re: BVD
To: laura@cassiopaea

. Good questions. I will ask him. Remind me if I don't have an answer for you in a week. He is always traveling so it is sometimes difficult to get him.

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: BVD
Date sent: Sun, 6 Jan 2002 20:19:22 -0500

On 6 Jan 2002, at 16:53, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> Good questions. I will ask him. Remind me if I don't have an answer
> for you in a week. He is always traveling so it is sometimes difficult to get
> him.

You looked, huh?

There's an important reason behind the question. I wonder if there is the same reason behind the remarks.

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:22:01 EST
Subject: Re: BVD
To: laura@cassiopaea

I have to say that he is wrong. I don't know how a mistake like that could get all the way to being published. It is good you caught it.

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: BVD
Date sent: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 20:58:24 -0500

On 7 Jan 2002, at 20:22, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> I have to say that he is wrong. I don't know how a mistake like that could get
> all the way to being published. It is good you caught it.

Well, how about this: he may be "wrong," but he is also "right." He knows something.

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:25:08 EST
Subject: Re: BVD
To: laura@cassiopaea

Whether it existed before the date it was published is one thing but I have been to the bibliotech in Paris and Schemit published in 1929.

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: BVD
Date sent: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:31:18 -0500

On 7 Jan 2002, at 22:25, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> Whether it existed before the date it was published is one thing but I have been
> to the bibliotech in Paris and Schemit published in 1929.

That's not the point. What I mean is: maybe BVD knows something and is giving a clue?

Because, as it happens, those two mistakes are very significant in terms of a clue given by C's.

Either BVD did it unconsciously, or he did it consciously. Can you find out which? If he just falls all over himself with embarrassment and says it's all a big mistake and "how did I ever do that?" Then I will know it was unconscious and he knows nothing.

Because, in the end, the "mistake" and the mathematical computations Ark has done on these clues match.

So, I am just curious if BVD knows what I think he knows.

Can you ask him?

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 00:17:02 EST
Subject: Re: BVD
To: laura@cassiopaea

I will ask him. I am almost afraid to ask - what are you talking about?

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: BVD
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 09:07:54 -0500

On 8 Jan 2002, at 0:17, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> I will ask him. I am almost afraid to ask - what are you talking about?

Just ask. Then I'll tell you.

I'm just finding all kinds of strange things in Dwellings - even the remark that it is supposed to be "interactive" with Le Mystere, which I had suspected, but until I read the direct statement last night, it was only a suspicion. Yeah, it seems that one has to wade through some strange passages that are put there on purpose to lead off in the wrong direction - but I am coding the subjects at the top of the pages so that I can relate them.

Don't you think it is perfectly hilarious that Mr. Van Doren's initials are "BVD?"

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 11:48:05 EST
Subject: Re: BVD
To: laura@cassiopaea

gives an entirely new meaning to 'briefing'.

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: BVD
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:55:47 -0500

On 8 Jan 2002, at 11:48, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> gives an entirely new meaning to 'briefing'.

LOL!!! How about "De-briefing???"

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: (Fwd) [cass] Cassiopaea Cult Awareness webring
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 15:02:15 -0500

Hi, Here is the latest salvo from VB. I am not quite sure what he thinks he will accomplish, except if we just take a cue from the description of Hitler's psychology, we know that he has to keep increasing the violence of his attacks, and that he has to project the blame onto those he attacks.

Well, he has, apparently, published the entire undedited CD of transcripts, including full names of some participants at the sessions...

Too bad he isn't aware of just WHO all of those participants are and what the repercussions might be.

Nevertheless, it may or may not be a ploy to drag US into any legal action between you and him. I know that you said you were going to file suit, but I don't know if you actually took any action.

As for us? Well, we will continue to ignore him. Legally, we have done all we could do to stop him from publishing personal names and other details. We leave him to his own fate on this one..

As to his claims that "The Wave" is derivative of AMET? I hope you have read it... but it is pretty clear that this is not the case and that it has nothing to do with it. But, again, he seems to be trying to drag us into some kind of lawsuit with you -

------- Forwarded message follows -------

----- Original Message -----
From: Vincent Bridges To: matrioshka@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 10:23 AM
Subject: [matrioshka] Special Announcement Department

Greetings and Felicitations to you all!

As most of you know, I have undergone "systematic harassment," cyber stalking, slander, libel of the most heinous and disgusting kind, lies, character assassination and and outright attempts to destroy me, my livelihood and my work at the hands of Laura Knight-Jadczyk, her husband Ark and their various attack robots and duped minions since last July.

In an effort to be fair, I have refrained from defending myself publicly and used this forum and their own supposedly open forums for that purpose. Andy and Ark have posted to this group my repeated apologies and attempts, dating back to August of 2001, to distance myself from the cassiopaeanists, none of which had the slightest effect except to increase the intensity of their attacks. From that any objective person might assume that my sole agenda has been to put as much distance between me and the cassiopaeanists as possible.

If Laura and Ark had just taken all mention of me down from the site, as I requested repeatedly, I would have been quite willing to let the whole thing drop. But they refused, and upped the ante yet again by blackmailing my former writing partner, Jay Weidner, into betraying me and our work together. Looking back, it is clear that that was the goal all along: to discredit me and destroy the work Jay and did on A Monument to the End of Time.

Now, this has been proven by the latest posted chapters, 17 and 18, in the on-going Noah rewrite. Anyone who has read any of mine and Jay's work will be able to recognize instantly where her ideas and her reactions came from. The Wave is derivative of our work in a broader sense, but here she is skating close to plagiarism while playing a complex game of I know more than you do. It would be funny if it were not so sad...

But, I can't afford to laugh off their insanity any longer. The time has come to publicly address the Cassiopaean Cult issue and tell the real, unedited version of the story.

To that end, I have set up vincentbridges.com as the main source site for the Cassiopaea Cult Awareness webring. On the site at the moment is the complete unedited transcripts of the Cassiopaean sessions from 1994 to 2000, available as a download and open to all comers. Also on the site is the beginning of a much longer article in which the complete story of the Cassiopaeans, Laura, Ark, "Frank" and my involvement with them will be detailed.

It is my honest opinion that the value of the cassiopaean sessions can only be measured and evaluated by an open and honest exchange of information, and to that end the complete unedited transcripts have been made openly and freely available to all who are interested. I would also like to hear from those who have had experiences with the Cassiopaeanists, both good and bad, and I will be glad to put any response I get up on the site.

This is my form of closure on the whole affair, and in a minor and humble way, my service to humanity. If one person learns something from all this, then it will not have been wasted.

Free will in all things! And earth for the earthlings!

"Knowledge from which no wisdom is derived is a like a fortune from which no charity is bestowed..." Mohammed

Thanks,

Vincent

-- This post is Copyright © 2001 by Vincent Bridges. All Rights Reserved. All original content may not be redistributed without the authors written consent.

------- End of forwarded message -------

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: (Fwd) [cass] Cassiopaea Cult Awareness webring
Date sent: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 23:16:51 -0500

On 8 Jan 2002, at 21:16, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> If he doesn't have a company then he is dead. I am going to sue him but,
> suddenly, every kind of trouble, every kind of disinformation, every kind of lie
> is being said about me. Not just here but in a hundred different directions. I
> am being snuffed out and I don't even have the time to get to a lawyer for VB.
> There is no way to describe the pressures being placed upon me. It has all
> happened parrellel to these events.

Indeed. Well, again, I don't even consider his latest salvo worth a response. Let him spin out his vicious tales until he wraps himself in the spider web completely. He is no longer my concern.

>
> The Evil One was released on 9-11. He is pissed at those who fought against him
> while he was imprisoned.

You got that right. And VB was whooping and hollering that the "ringing voice of the Goddess has been heard." So, we know which side he is on!

Jay, things are very, very weird. I guess we ought to sit back and enjoy the show! (Doing what we have to do, of course, but not being too attached to any of it.)

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: VB again
Date sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 20:28:34 -0500

Gee Jay,

Did we "turn up the heat" on you in some way????

Or did I miss something?

I thought I was just busy minding my own business, working on my projects, and enjoying peace and quiet for a week or so. I also thought we were having a little fun in the middle of all this VB generated nightmare. In fact, I was happy to just let sleeping dogs lie, let the whole thing die away in cyberland and get on with my life.

Please: if I have said or done something that makes you uncomfortable or "warm" or something, tell me.

------- Forwarded message follows -------
From: Vincent Bridges <"Vincent Bridges".
Date: Thu Jan 10, 2002 5:27 pm
Subject: Re: [matrioshka] Questions for Vincent about new web page

Hi Laine,

> I have a few questions about your new web page which features the unedited C
> transcripts.
>
> 1) What are your plans for this web page? How do you see it developing?

I was forced to grab vincentbridges.com one step ahead of the cassiopaeanists who wanted to use it for their material on me. When "Frank" gave me permission to publish the unedited transcripts I decided to use the domain name that I already had available. In addition to the unedited transcripts, the site will eventually contain a complete account of my involvement with Cassioapeans, as well as evidence from their own words and deeds that they are indeed a scam at best and a doomsday cult at worst. "Frank" will also be telling his story and Stormy will be contributing his research on Ark's background. I have invited anyone else with a story to tell to join in as well.

>
> 2) What reactions do you anticipate from the C camp?

They have tried to intimidate "Frank" so far, and they have turned up the heat on my former partner Jay Weidner. They have put everyone on casschat on moderation to make sure that my announcement doesn't reach the faithful. I and everyone on my IP are banned from even accessing the cassiopaean's site. That's so that I don't read their attempts to steal and co-opt my research as they post new sections of Noah. They also remove any mention of my announcement from their discussion forum on the website, again to try and keep the faithful in the dark.

>
> 3) For those of us who don't have the gumption to print out both versions of
> the C transcripts and compare, are you claiming that Laura and Ark have
> actually changed the original transcripts? If so, does "Frank"die concure? Can
> you provide side by side examples of the transcripts before and after
> alteration?

L'ark has changed the transcripts as they are posted on the website. A comparison of virtually any session posted on their website with the original on mine will show how severe and distorting the changes are. "Frank" says she was changing the transcripts between the raw data and the typed transcript. He also agrees that she has done even more damage to the text in her selective postings, and the now supposedly complete transcripts are far from complete and nowhere near accurate.

>
> 4) Critics might accuse you of doctoring the transcripts, do you have ironclad
> proof that the transcripts available on your website are the originals?

Sure do. I tried to give the original CD back to Ark twice, and it was refused each time. I still have that disc, with Ark's handwriting on the label, and a simple random examination is enough to show that I have not changed so much as a letter.

>
> 5) Do you have corroberation, from at least one independant cult expert, that
> Ark & Laura are running a cult? Otherwise, you could easily be dismissed as
> using hyperbole.

See http://www.crank.net/religion.html. They list them as a cult, rated "cranky." The Florida Department of Law Enforcement had no trouble identifying them as a cult. In your own limited encounter with them, how many items on that cult check list did you experience? And yes, as you will see as I post the rest of the story on my website, there are several experts who will agree completely that the Cassiopaeanists are indeed just another form of cultic scam run by a charismatic psychopath.

> My commments:
>
> Associating Cassiopaea with a cult seems like a real exaggeration, from my
> standpoint. Granted, I haven't been on the inside, but if you want to be taken
> seriously I think terms like "cult" should only be used if it's backed up with
> a mound of evidence. I'll need to see a whole lot more to convince me A&L are
> running a cult, and I hope you'll eventually provide that evidence on your
> site. Just making an accusation and putting up a few links with descriptions
> of cults won't make your case, and will only leave you subject to more
> ridicule.

Coming soon, just keep watching...

>
> However, I do think A&L could be on the slippery slope to legitimate cult
> status, eventually. They are becoming damn scary people, if you ask me, but I
> don't equate that with cult leadership at this point.
>
> Just my opinions on the matter.
>
> Laine

Good opinions so far. You were just not close enough to see the whole picture.

Thanks,

Vincent

------- End of forwarded message -------

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 22:24:15 EST
Subject: Re: VB again
To: laura@cassiopaea

We exchanged a couple of very bitter emails. I told him he was a sociopath and that I couldn't sue his book company because it does not exist.

This is his reaction. I will not be emailing him anymore so maybe it will go away.

By the way he says that he has 'proof' that you attempted to murder someone. I called Stan Tenen and left a message telling him that VB is saying that Stan started the rumor that JR killed JBR. I left a message saying that I know the truth. I still think that this is a good tactic as Stan seemes to have endless amounts of money for lawyers. Why don't you do what you can to get Stan to understand that VB is slandering him. And that I am his best witness.

This is all just end of the world madness. We should expect it to get worse.

Why don't you guys buy vincebridges.com or vincentbridge.com and turn the tables on him?

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
>
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: VB again
Send reply to: laura@cassiopaea
Date sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:22:04 -0500

On 10 Jan 2002, at 22:24, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> We exchanged a couple of very bitter emails. I told him he was a sociopath and
> that I couldn't sue his book company because it does not exist.
>
> This is his reaction. I will not be emailing him anymore so maybe it will go
> away.

Hah! Don't bet on it!!!

>
> By the way he says that he has 'proof' that you attempted to murder someone.

Sure. When I was 17 years old I was approached by a guy who tried to get me to lure gov officials into sexual escapades so he could film them through a camera set in an A/C vent. I refused. the guy got rough with me and I whacked him so hard he nearly died. He spent 17 days in critical condition. And because he was my first "psychopath," (I was really dumb), he claimed that I just attacked him for "no reason!!!"

Well, the court thought otherwise. I was found not guilty by reason of self- defense, and if anybody wants to check on it they can ask Brian Hayes, Esq, or Joe Aloi, P.I., like Tom French did. He was assured by both of them that I was lucky to escape with my life from this predator.

> I
> called Stan Tenen and left a message telling him that VB is saying that Stan
> started the rumor that JR killed JBR. I left a message saying that I know the
> truth. I still think that this is a good tactic as Stan seemes to have endless
> amounts of money for lawyers. Why don't you do what you can to get Stan to
> understand that VB is slandering him. And that I am his best witness.

The only problem is: what can you do when you sue somebody who is simply too psychopathic to understand the possibilities of what could happen to him via legal action? This is VB's problem. He is not afraid of the law. He has succeeded too many times in NOT getting sued when he OUGHT to have been sued, that he continues preying on innocent people.

And why should Stan sue him? The fact is, VB is saying that YOU are his back- up and proof that JR was involved in the Ramsey case. He says that this was the one thing that the two of you held back from saying in the JonBenet article, and that this was the thing that YOU discovered in your research... which HE, of course, was in on.

I have never heard him say that Stan started the rumor. But I HAVE heard him say that YOU made the connection and that this is why JR fired you (if JR did fire you, which I don't even know for a fact.) But, that is what he points out: you discovered the "truth about JR" (sounds like Dallas!), and discussed it over the phone with him, and poof! You were out of a job. And, of course, being out of a job is his proof that you were the one who uncovered the unsavory fact!!!

>
> This is all just end of the world madness. We should expect it to get worse.

Not a joke!

>
> Why don't you guys buy vincebridges.com or vincentbridge.com and turn the
> tables on him?

Waste of money. Wouldn't own it if I could!!!

Oy. It is certainly interesting times we live in, yes???

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 23:49:35 EST
Subject: Re: VB again
To: laura@cassiopaea

I wish you could give me some proof that he did say that about me and JR. Anything will do. Do you have anyone besides you that will say this?

Jay

PS - The article on JBR came out in march or april 2000. The company I was working for lost its funding in August 2000. We were starting a .com for JR when the bottom fell out of the market. I left with stock and moved back to California where I belong.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
>
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: VB again
Send reply to: laura@cassiopaea
Date sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 00:20:27 -0500

On 10 Jan 2002, at 23:49, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> PS - The article on JBR came out in march or april 2000. The company I was
> working for lost its funding in August 2000. We were starting a .com for JR
> when the bottom fell out of the market. I left with stock and moved back to
> California where I belong.

Remember the email from VB dated early august of 2000 where he uses initials to talk about JR and JBR and calls you the "weak link?"

Well, his "excuse" that a whole raft of things were happening, including you losing your job, was because the two of you were talking JR's part in the JBR case. Go back and re-read that email that I sent you.

His allusion was that you two were talking on JR's phone - the "company phone," and that JR was tapping it, and JR, beind "head satanist," then dumped you and sent somebody to take photos of VB's house.

Of course, he LATER transferred that whole incident to OCTOBER and used it to implicate poor Johan.

But, the email DATED August, where he says those things, is the closest he comes to putting it in print. Except when I spelled it out in the other email and he did not DENY it, but only declared that I had no right to talk about "private" info, or whatever.

Did anyone else ever hear him say it? Sure. My husband.

But those emails are proof, even if he would swear that "JR" meant John Reynolds and that JBR meant June Blue Rickles.

So, the only real "proof" is the fact that he said it to us, followed it up in allusion in those emails.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
>
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Fulcanelli
Send reply to: laura@cassiopaea
Date sent: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 12:45:35 -0500

Hi, Just wanted to report something rather nice. We have received several emails from readers who are NOW aware of Fulcanelli like never before. What's more, they are INTERESTED in learning more. So, as a sort of "Fulcanelli expert" you will soon discover a burgeoning audience for your work!!!

I am going to go back through the chapters and work in some positive direction for Guenon as well. Not quite sure how I can connect them just yet, but the readers need to follow that line as well.

Any suggestions? Are you going to be writing any commentary on the works of the two of them or has anyone else done so whose work you would reccommend?

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:14:38 EST
Subject: Re: Jay
To: laura@cassiopaea

Gee I don't know. The web of confusion is growing and ST is right. The only way to stay the course is by telling the truth. Let the liars be damned!

No matter what is said about me I have done nothing wrong. This is not to say that I have not made mistakes. I surely have. But I will own up to these mistakes and pray that those I hurt understand that I am sorry. Other than that I have broken no laws, lied in any way or stolen or cheated. What else can I do? This is the point in the quest where the truth is the only thing that matters.

If one has been living in truth there is nothing to fear.

Perhaps an article on sociopaths in the new age or something would work. We could all participate in it and I could get it up on Jeff Rense's site. He is a good friend of mine but I am not sure that an open forum on live radio would appeal to him. Now Laura Lee is also a good friend but I think her show is off the air. She would have let us all on to do this if she were still on the air. Maybe I should call her.

Jay

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:55:15 EST
Subject: (no subject)
To: laura@cassiopaea

Laura:

While I appreciate your toning down the Schwaller/Nazi link I am asking you to be very careful with what you say. The book was surely not printed in Paris in 1943. Also the translator of Dwellings has read AON and concluded it was written in the last half of the 19th century. I give you this info freely and know that you must use it. If you say that there is an internet site that says 'blah blah blah' about AON then you are helping VB. Many will go to the web and type it in and discover VB's disinfo site. Please consider what you are doing and who is the source.

I have no idea where you are heading. If you are going to say that Schwaller was a cointelpro nazi, then I wish you would wait. This will do untold damage to the traditionalists. Besides Schwaller deserves to be heard on the evidence and not some schmuck's book.

In Vanderbroeken's book he gives a huge clue away. This clue reveals his real intentions and also a great truth. Do you remember where he says he found the class list for one of Schwaller's lectures and Rudolf Hess was in attendance? Think about that very carefully and you will see the entire hall of mirrors. Not only his intentions to smear Schwaller but something else far deeper. Something that has to do with cointel.

I knew that I would get crap for the Peru interpetation. Do not think that I did it without a great deal of forethought. However I will be vindicated on this. I know I sound arrogant but there are many current discoveries being made in this most primitive of countries. Many of them so mind blowing that Egypt is looking bleak.

By the way the western tradition came from Egypt. You are wrong about this. In fact the Cathedrals are created in the exact mathematical ratios used to construct the temple of Egypt. This is well known. This is what Fulcanelli had Schwaller prove. Beware of lies. Once you understand the Great Secret one understands the need for temples of this type and variety. This isn't mumbo jumbo - this is real. Every aspect of an Egyptian temple or a gothic cathedral was used to reveal the Great Secret. Once one understands the Great Secret this all becomes obvious.

You must remember I don't recieve anything. I have to read and think before I reach a conclusion. No entity is giving me info. That is why I am making mistakes. But I am a fool. There can be no doubt. The fool's path is the only path left in the darkest night of the final throes of this age.

Jay

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
>
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: Jay Copies to: Stan Tenen <meru1@well.com
>
Send reply to: laura@cassiopaea
Date sent: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 11:56:30 -0500

CC to Stan

On 12 Jan 2002, at 11:14, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> Perhaps an article on sociopaths in the new age or something would work. We
> could all participate in it and I could get it up on Jeff Rense's site. He is a
> good friend of mine but I am not sure that an open forum on live radio would
> appeal to him. Now Laura Lee is also a good friend but I think her show is off
> the air. She would have let us all on to do this if she were still on the air.
> Maybe I should call her.
>

Hi, Well, I have just had to go through another round with VB. Have a look at the new page: http://www.cassiopaea.com/cass/tallahassee.ht

MAnd just to see how the readers are responding, just since last night when the page was put up, click the "reader response" link at the bottom of the page....

I didn't realize that there really is a lot of support out there in cyber land from real, sincere, intelligent people.

From: Laura Knight-Jadczyk laura@cassiopaea
>
To: Goldenflower@...
Subject: Re: (no subject)
Send reply to: laura@cassiopaea
Date sent: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 12:15:17 -0500

On 12 Jan 2002, at 11:55, Goldenflower@... wrote:

> Laura:
>
> While I appreciate your toning down the Schwaller/Nazi link I am asking you to
> be very careful with what you say. The book was surely not printed in Paris in
> 1943. Also the translator of Dwellings has read AON and concluded it was
> written in the last half of the 19th century. I give you this info freely and
> know that you must use it. If you say that there is an internet site that says
> 'blah blah blah' about AON then you are helping VB. Many will go to the web and
> type it in and discover VB's disinfo site. Please consider what you are doing
> and who is the source.

Okay. I didn't want to quote your info because I didn't want to point in your direction. Can I say that a person who has actually SEEN the book says thus and so, and the other remarks were obviously from a person who had NEVER seen the book? And just keep your identity confidential? Or do you want to be attributed?

I want to handle that carefully for your protection.

>
> I have no idea where you are heading. If you are going to say that Schwaller
> was a cointelpro nazi, then I wish you would wait. This will do untold damage
> to the traditionalists. Besides Schwaller deserves to be heard on the evidence
> and not some schmuck's book.

I am reading his info and it seems to be true. And that is what we need to talk about. He managed to slide himself into the traditionalists camp undetected, just as VB was doing. This needs to be exposed for the sake of the traditionalists. It is VERY telling that this has so enraged VB...

>
> In Vanderbroeken's book he gives a huge clue away. This clue reveals his
> real intentions and also a great truth. Do you remember where he says he
> found the class list for one of Schwaller's lectures and Rudolf Hess was in
> attendance? Think about that very carefully and you will see the entire hall of
> mirrors. Not only his intentions to smear Schwaller but something else far
> deeper. Something that has to do with cointel.

Yes. But again, I am READING Schwaller directly and he IS part of the COINTELPRO!!! I am positive of it and we need to show the lies sandwiched between the truth that are leading some of the traditionalists offtrack!

>
> I knew that I would get crap for the Peru interpetation. Do not think that I
> did it without a great deal of forethought. However I will be vindicated on
> this. I know I sound arrogant but there are many current discoveries being made
> in this most primitive of countries. Many of them so mind blowing that Egypt is
> looking bleak.

Well, there is some stuff that I have on this also. And it is not looking like it was a positive bunch. Did you ever look at my "monster" page where the Ica skulls are displayed? Did you ever compare these to the imagery of the heads of the Egyptian "elite?" Did you think about the Inca tradition of slashing the penis in offering to the gods? How about the transmission of the custom of circumcision to Egypt? I also found evidence that one of the "stop overs" was in the Indus Valley... an image of a circumcised phallus found there.... and certain "structural" similarities between that civilization and Egypt.

The skull malformation is evidence of genetic mixing with the nephilim... the former rulers of the Incas... and they were NOT the good guys, even if they brought civilization.

The concept of flaying the sacrifice and wearing the skin came from the Incas... it was carried to India, the Indus Valley, and became part of the myth of the dance of Shiva ... the whole blood sacrifice thing...

There is just a whole host of stuff that I have collected evidence for that indicates that the Inca civilization was the source of the Indus Valley gang, then to Egypt, then to Judaism... the monotheistic, blood thirsty Control System.

>
> By the way the western tradition came from Egypt. You are wrong about this. In
> fact the Cathedrals are created in the exact mathematical ratios used to
> construct the temple of Egypt. This is well known. This is what Fulcanelli had
> Schwaller prove. Beware of lies. Once you understand the Great Secret one
> understands the need for temples of this type and variety. This isn't mumbo
> jumbo - this is real. Every aspect of an Egyptian temple or a gothic cathedral
> was used to reveal the Great Secret. Once one understands the Great Secret this
> all becomes obvious.
>
> You must remember I don't recieve anything. I have to read and think before I
> reach a conclusion. No entity is giving me info. That is why I am making
> mistakes. But I am a fool. There can be no doubt. The fool's path is the only
> path left in the darkest night of the final throes of this age.

Then, since C's have pointed me in certain directions, but I had to do the work, and this "pointing" has led to some AMAZING discoveries in a "hard work way," I will try to share it with you if you ask. The COINTELPRO thing is a Cosmic deal and has been going on for millennia. That's why we have to even strip away these assumptions about the comparisons between the "circle people" and the "triangle People." Yes, there are certain principles of geometry that are the same, because they relate to the "energy source." It is the USE that was made of it that has been distorted and lied about.

I can PROVE this with evidence, so hang on and let me get the files back from the editor on this one and I'll give them to you. And when I can get the time, I can go through some of Schwaller's stuff that I have marked, and show you how it twists... it is VERY clever stuff, for sure.

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:23:33 EST
Subject: Re: (no subject)
To: laura@cassiopaea

I don't care about attribution as much as accuracy. It is too late for secrecy now.

Jay

From: Goldenflower@...
Date sent: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 21:03:19 EST
Subject: Re: Chapter 19
To: laura@cassiopaea

I just read your chapter and I have to say that no matter how one approaches the Great Work they can never simplify it. It always ends up in a collision of ideas, myths and exposition. I tried to do it in AMET and it didn't work. You are trying to do it here and I don't think anyone will get it. I am sorry. Just being honest.

You are very close but you have not discovered what 'higher thought' is. It is a physical process that creates something. It isn't a metaphor or a concept. It is real. There are ways of performing a physical alchemy that does the trick. You are close but only to a limited degree.

As for the Matrix, please let me warn you. There is no technology back there. Sure someone might find a clay battery or something like that but there is no technology. If you think the answer is to be found in technology you are wrong. technology is a sign of the end of the world. The hunter gatherers did not need technology to accomplish the Great Work. I am warning you - don't fall for the materialist trap. There is no evidence of a high technological civilization on earth. None. Even Cremo's work does not prove this. I invite you to read 'Voices of the First Day' by Robert Lawlor to really understand what is happening. One can see 'The Matrix ( as you call it), rise up to the next level of being with a shred of technology. Technology stupifies us, weakens us, makes us lazy and eventually will turn us all into sociopaths.

The cathedrals were models for the Matrix. But they were also chambers for the Great Work. The reason they were built like nature and the woods is because the hunter gatherers used those as their source.

All people on Earth once knew the Great Secret. It was taken by the priests of Egypt and they made it a secret. Then only the Pharoh could accomplish the Great Work. This is the iron age at work. The corruption of the Great Secret into a hierarchy was the end of humanity. It took 5000 years to finally finish us off - but there it is.

They were not Dragon Slayer as much as they were Dragon Tamers. Look at the pictures of Mary Magdeline and Mother Mary. They are standing on top of 'live snakes. They are not killing them. They are taming them. They are placing the power of the snake below them. They use the energy of the snake by taming it's vicious nature and transmuting it. This is the key to the secret. Think about Jason and you will see the truth.

Jay

Continue with the Weidner Correspondence

Is Truth Defamatory?

The COINTELPRO Files: Vincent Bridges and Co. (photographic exhibit)

The Bridges - Jadczyk Correspondence

The Weidner - Jadczyk Correspondence

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .

[an error occurred while processing this directive]