Article - Laura Knight-Jadczyk


Knowledge and Being

Éiriú Eolas

Signs of The Times

Site Map

Daily News and Commentary

The Signs Quick Guide

Note to New Readers



Message Board


The Secret History of The World by Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Discover the Secret History of the World - and how to get out alive!


Adventures with Cassiopaea









Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 9


I would like to discuss here several session excerpts. In the first one, Terry announced at the beginning of the session that he was low on energy, and we can now recognize that this might have tended to reduce the shielding effect. If Terry was low on energy, that would mean that Frank's negative agenda would be more able to manifest, as was, indeed, the case. What made the session even more problematical was the presence of guests - this was the first session attended by Tom French.

I was pretty happy that Tom had decided to attend a session. I was absolutely certain that he would see that the group was far more interesting than I was. I hoped that the result would be that he would then want to interview the other members and that the focus might shift to the group and away from me, individually and specifically.

When he scheduled his attendance at this session, Tom had specifically asked that we should not do anything in any way different from any other session - he just wanted to be a fly on the wall, so to speak. I promised that I try to make everything as "normal" as possible. I decided not to notify any of the group members in advance that Tom would be at the session. I wasn't being discourteous by springing something on them that they might not find agreeable, because all of them had already said that they hoped he would attend a session soon. As I saw it, Tom's attendance would be a surprise, but a nice one. At the same time, I was keeping my promise not to do anything different. Now, let's look at a few specific remarks from that session:

June 3, 1995
Q: (L) Hello.
A: Hello.
Q: (T) I'm running on low energy.
Q: (L) We have guests this evening; this is Tom and Cherie.
A: Hello Tom and Cherie.

The session went along rather normally, with the standard kinds of questions we ordinarily asked, and nothing particularly different in any way. Anyone can read the sessions and determine that this is so, which is what made "the remark" so surprising.

A: This is more complex than your queries allow.
Q: (L) In other words, our questions are not complex enough to get the answer?
A: You are "rushing it" due to company present, now please relax and just behave as always.
Q: (J) She's trying to show off! (L) I am not! (SV) That's what they said! (L) That's not what they said, and I am not the only one asking questions.  (T) Let's start over with something simple. We are talking about the aura or something similar. The planet's aura.
A: Yes.

I was more than a little stung by such a remark, followed by Jan's declaration that I was "showing off." What was more, as I pointed out at the moment, I wasn't the only one asking questions, nor was I in any way "rushing" anything. A bit later, the C's made the comment:

A: You are drifting and there is much too much thought fragmentation tonight.

We can now recognize that the suggestion that the subject was too complex for the board would have lead to the suggestion for Frank to channel directly. If anything would have turned Tom French off to the C's, that would have done it. So, even though Jan's teasing remark focused the attention in her direction, we can now see that it was a diversion away from Frank's agenda. The remark that there was too much thought fragmentation was a warning from C's that something was going on, and in retrospect we think that it was a sort of 'battle of forces.' What happened toward the end of the session was also rather strange:

Q: (L) Let's go onto something else that is more simple. The other night the children saw some lights in the sky.  I went out to see what they were talking about and at that point there were no moving lights, but there was a single, pulsating, red light about ten degrees to the right of Jupiter. My initial reaction to it was that it was atmospheric twinkle of a large red star or the planet Mars. There was nothing there the following night. What was it the children saw?
A: Children saw planes and a helicopter.
Q: (L) Well, what was it I saw when I saw this red, pulsating light which did not move for quite some time?
A: Mars.
Q: (L) It was not Mars because it wasn't there the next night.
A: Clouds.
Q: (T) Yeah, there were clouds on Mars that night. (J) Well, let's move on. (L) Well, I thought it was Mars. (J) You were right.
A: You were right.

The only problem was, it could not have been Mars. And at that moment, I knew it couldn't have been Mars. But rather than argue the point, I decided to let it drop. I was hugely disappointed that the session had not been like so many of the others, full of fun and lively exchange and accurate information. Of course, that may have been partly due to my own wish that the group would "shine" and demonstrate that it would be far more interesting for Tom to write about ALL of us, than just me. But there had been a distinctly unpleasant sensation in the air at the time, and I wanted to know why. Jan had drawn attention to herself by saying "She's just trying to show off," and that was very hurtful, most especially when it wasn't true. In fact, the opposite was true. I wanted to know what had happened, why the energy had been so unpleasant. So, Frank and I had a session a few days later to ask about this. In retrospect, this wasn't a very good idea because it gave Frank the opportunity, as occurred on many other occasions, to divert attention and suspicion away from himself, and plant it on others.

June 6, 1995
Q: (L) Hello.
A: Stop.
Q: (L) What does that mean?  (F) Don't ask me!  (L) Hello!
A: Hello.  Azoref from Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Who was it that said stop?
A: Static.
Q: (L) There was static?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What was the source of the static?
A: Not important, static always present to some degree.
Q: (L) I want to ask some fairly quick questions.
A: Okay.
Q: (L) With whom were we communicating on Saturday night? 
A: Cassiopaea.
Q: (L) Was there any corruption in Saturday night's session?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Well, I am not looking for a maybe. I felt somewhat offended by the atmosphere that was generated. We had guests and it was important...
A: If corrupted, came from 3rd level.
Q: (L) Can you only identify the corruption that comes from your level?
A: No.
Q: (L) Was there an element of... I don't want to lead here... my impression was that the group was in a state of tension, is this correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Why?
A: Jan was unhappy because of guests.
Q: (L) Why?
A: Not notified ahead. [...] If there is strong prejudice by any member or members of level three channel participants it may cause messages to be altered at the point of reception.
Q: (L) [...] I spent a lot of time preparing questions and it seemed that whatever was making it through the "prejudiced channel" did not even want to deal with questions that were quite similar to many we have asked in the past -- so it seems that the prejudice came through toward me in a specific way.
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, if people can be so easily subjected to prejudice and emotional thinking, would that not be considered psychic attack?
A: Result of. Careful not to make hasty moves based upon events which may be transitory in nature.
Q: (L) Well, I feel like we have all been under attack...
A: Attack does not emanate from Terry and Jan.
Q: (L)  Well, the whole session seems ruined. Even the answer about the lights in the sky was verifiably wrong. You have said that the channel is "grooved" and cannot be corrupted, yet obviously wrong answers were given, and it seems that you are saying that the attack is "through" Terry and Jan and the garbled emotions they are experiencing, correct?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, even the answer about the lights in the sky. Mars is 120 degrees away from Jupiter...

We can note a very strange thing in the above remarks: first, Jan is being blamed for the emotional prejudice that poisoned the atmosphere of the session, and at the same time, it is being said that the "attack" does not emanate "from" Terry and Jan, which suggests that it was "through" them rather than originating there.

And I missed the clue. It never would have occurred to me that Frank, himself, was the vector of attack, that he could possibly have been emanating the energies that affected Jan, as well as the rest of us in the room.

Nevertheless, after this incident, Frank renewed his campaign to do the direct channeling, and so the group discussed it and decided we would give it another try. I started off with my question about the session itself that had been described by me as "corrupted," and that wrong answers had been given as a result of this corruption, to which the C's had given assent that my analysis was correct.

Q: (L) The first question I have is concerning last Saturday night's session, which nobody seems to have been happy with. We would like to understand why the information seemed to be so garbled and distorted and, quite frankly, incorrect.
A: What makes you feel it was incorrect?
Q: (L) Because one of the answers was that what I was seeing outside was the planet Mars. It could not have been the planet Mars because Mars was 120 degrees away from the planet Jupiter.
A: Perhaps the question was posed in such a way as to receive that response. Suggest you check the material more closely.

The reader can look at the question and response above and see quite clearly that the question was not posed in such a way as to "lead" the response. And, in fact, when I pointed out that the light could not have been Mars because it wasn't there the next night, the answer was that I couldn't see it because of clouds, which was also incorrect. I couldn't see it the next night because it wasn't there. There were no obscuring clouds.

Q: (L) It was also said that the children were seeing airplanes and helicopters. When I went out, what I saw was most definitely not a helicopter or an airplane and was only ten degrees away from the planet Jupiter, and was a red, pulsating light. Can you tell me what I saw?
A: Well, if you desire to believe that what you saw was something other than any response given, that's perfectly acceptable. But, when inquiring upon such things as visual reference, one must be prepared for any and all answers.
Q: (L) That seems to be rather evasive.
A: Evasiveness may also indicate a desire to help one learn about oneself and one's environment.
Q: (L) What I saw out there was not an airplane or a helicopter; it was also not the planet Mars. Whatever it was, it was not there the following night or any night subsequent to that. Therefore, it was some sort of object that wasn't of a sort that we usually see, and it baffles me as to why it would be conducive to learning for me to...
A: May we ask a question?
Q: (L) Sure.
A: When seeking to identify visual reference, would it not be wise to be patient with the outcome of the analysis?
Q: (L) Well, sure.
A: You state that what you saw was not a plane or a helicopter. We are interested to know how you can be certain of that?
Q: (L) Because I stood and watched it for a considerable period of time and it never moved.
A: Does that indicate that it was not a helicopter?
Q: (L) Yes, because even helicopters, when they hover, there is some lateral or horizontal movement or motion, and they also have different kinds of lights on them. They don't sit there and look like a single, large, reddish orange, glowing light that pulsates.

The subject was changed right after the above because none of us saw any point in pursuing it. All the while these words were coming out of Frank, we were all looking at each other and silently signaling each other that this was most definitely NOT the C's talking. I was embarrassed for Frank. He had no idea how pompous and condescending he sounded nor that he was being viewed as a poseur by the other members of the group. I continued to have faith that his "talent" could be developed, but I knew that he needed more exposure to the C's by group channeling before we tried trance channeling again. What is more, I protected him. I didn't want to undermine his confidence by telling him that everybody felt just plain yucky in his presence when he channeled on his own. After all, his claim to be able to "channel" was the only thing he had. How could I take it away from him?

Continue to Page 53

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.


You are visitor number [TextCounter Fatal Error: This Page Not In Valid URI].