|
Adventures
With Cassiopaea
Chapter
15
Meanwhile,
Frank began to play some heavy duty games with me. Because of the time
difference between the US and Europe, I wanted to adjust my schedule so
as to be up and about during the times of the day when Ark and I could
communicate either by email or phone. Frank seemed to be equally determined
that I should operate on his schedule. He started pushing the envelope
on this issue, arriving later and later on the nights we had sessions,
making it impossible for us to get started at a reasonable hour so that
I could get to bed at a reasonable hour and be up in time for a few hours
with Ark. On a few occasions, I simply announced when he arrived that
it was too late to have a session, we would chat for a short time, and
then seeing that I really meant it, he would yawn and go home. I noticed
that my energy was increasing and Frank's was diminishing. He was also
showing serious signs of jealousy that there were things I shared with
Ark that I did not share with him. He would periodically try to plant
seeds of dissent by suggesting I was being "controlled" by Ark,
simply because I wanted to spend as much time with him as possible - considering
the fact that it was so little, and he was so far away.
All of these
confusing issues brought me back to the subject of just how our interactions
with others might make us vulnerable to attack. What was the significance
of "agents" and "moles" and who might be the "mole"
in the group, and did it even matter? At one point, V** had been pronounced
to be a mole. At another point, several other individuals who Frank didn't
like were also pronounced to be "moles." Just who was on first
here? I needed to know! A visit from my brother gave me the opportunity
I needed to ask these questions. We discussed the matter and agreed before
Frank arrived that we would use my brother's situation as the "question
model." He did, indeed, want information about his own concerns,
but we agreed that I could slip in a question or two about Frank. But
before we moved to that issue, I wanted to cover the issue of "monitoring"
and energy exchange in a more open way to see what would come out.
05-03-97
Q: I have quite a number of questions this evening. The first one is:is
it possible for a person to be used as a monitor, to monitor other people's
activities through their eyes and ears?
A: Possible, but hardly necessary.
Q: You once said that PZ was like a monitor, that wherever she went,
she monitored aural frequencies for whoever had put the implant into
her. Was this an unusual situation?
A: Most likely.
Q: Last week we did not have a session, but went through the notes I
have been making since I was in Gainesville. Frank became very tired
and went home. I was not tired. Usually, Frank is not tired, and I
am the one that is exhausted. I would like to ask about this. Is there
some sort of energy exchange that takes place during channeling?
A: Not in that way.
Q: Well, both Terry and Jan commented on this, and I would like to know
if there is any relationship of this reversal to the fact that we did
not do a session?
A: Terry and Jan's comments in this case should be viewed with caution,
as they may be nebulous in their intent.
Q: When you say nebulous... my perception was that they wanted to develop
a separate channel, as before.
A: They wanted to pursue their own idea of casting doubts upon Frank.
Q: Well, not only was that going on, but I was sharing the information
that I had gathered in response to clues given in the material, and
I had the impression that it was not interesting to them. Yet, I thought
that the fact that clues in the material had led to such discoveries
was extremely important...
A: Interesting to some includes only that which casts the spotlight
upon themselves.
In this
last question above, the term "them" was employed deliberately
with the intent of inquiring about Frank, since, as it happens, it
did not apply to Terry and Jan who were, in fact, most interested
in the material. Frank, however, didn't know that since he had
left early and was not present for our later discussion. In this way,
I was able to ask about Frank himself. Next, I began my approach to the
question through the medium of asking about my brother.
Q: Reading through the session of May 23, last year, when Tom was also
here, and the issue of his being in O'Brien was addressed, you asked
who had begged him to stay there, then there was a remark about an EM
vector. The way I understood it is that a person can be an EM vector.
Is that possible?
A: Vector means focuser of direction.
Q: Could that mean that EM waves can be vectored by a human being simply
by their presence? I also noticed that several of us have been involved
with persons and relationships that seem designed to confuse, defuse,
and otherwise distort our learning, as well as drain our energy. Basically,
keeping us so stressed that we cannot fulfill our potential. Is there
some significance to this observation?
A: That is elementary, my dear Knight!
Q: One of the things I have learned is that these individuals seem to
attach via some sort of psychic hook that enters through our reactions
of pity. Can you comment on the nature of pity?
A: Pity those who pity.
Q: But, the ones who are being pitied, who generate sensations of pity,
do not really pity anybody but themselves.
A: Yes...?
Q: Then, is it true as my son said, when you give pity, when you send
love and light to those in darkness, or those who complain and want
to be "saved" without effort on their own part, when you are
kind in the face of abuse and manipulation, that you essentially are
giving power to their further disintegration, or contraction into self-ishness?
That you are powering their descent into STS?
A: You know the answer!
Q: Yes. I have seen it over and over again. Were the individuals inour
lives selected for the extremely subtle nature of their abilities to
evoke pity, or were we programmed to respond to pity so that we were
blind to something that was obvious to other people?
A: Neither. You were selected to interract with those who would triggera
hypnotic response that would ultimately lead to a drain of energy.
Q: (T) Well, it is a fact, because my energy is sure drained. (L) What
is the purpose of this draining of energy?
A: What do you think?
Q: (T) So you can't concentrate or do anything. You can't get anywhere
with anything.
A: Or, at least not the important things.
Q: (T) Is that why my concentration is so low?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Is L a robot type?
A: You are dealing with a no-win situation!!
Q: It is a no win situation...
A: As you know.
Q: (T) So, if I don't get out, I will just keep going down. Is it the
area or the person?
A: Both. One is wrapped within the other.
Q: (L) Why is it that it seems to be one of the primary things about
us that prevents us from acting against such situations, is our fearof
hurting another person? That was the chief thing that kept me inmy
marriage for so long. And, only when I knew that it was hurting the
kids more to stay, did I have the power to get out. Why are we so afraid
of hurting someone's feelings if they are hurting us?
A: Not correct concept. You do not need to "act against them,
"you need to act in favor of your destiny.
Q: But, when you do that, these persons make you so completely miserable
that there seems to be no other choice but a parting of the ways.
A: Yes, but that is not "acting against." Quite the contrary.
In fact, remember, it takes two to tango, and if you are both tangoing
when the dance hall bursts into flames, you both get burned!!!
Q: Why is it that when one tries to extricate from such a "tango,
"why is there is such violent resistance to letting you go when
it is obvious, clearly obvious, that they do not have any feeling for
you as a human being?
A: It is not "they." We are talking about conduits of attack.
Q: What is it that makes them susceptible to becoming conduits of attack?
A: All STS are candidates for this. There are only about 6 billion
of you though.
Q: Okay, all people can be conduits of attack. (L) Would just coming
down and working with us on Saturdays, on a regular basis, help him
to get his concentration back?
A: Making the necessary changes would.
The intent
of this last question was to determine if channeling with the group was
actually something that was helping Frank. The answer was somewhat ambiguous
to me. What did "making the necessary changes" mean? Even
though the C's were giving pretty definitive and clear answers that would
have suggested to me that Frank was definitely running the program, the
"pity me" thing and all that, this last remark gave me the straw
to hang onto, allowing me to convince myself that it was a simple matter
of Frank making the necessary changes, that he would win that battle with
the darkness, and everything would be fine.
Q: Is
it true that being in the presence of such people, that one is under
the influence of an energy, an emanation from them physically, that
befuddles the mind and makes it almost impossible to think ones' way
out of the situation?
A: It is the draining of energy that befuddles the mind.
Q: Where does this energy drain to?
A: 4th density STS.
Q: They drain our energy from us and 4th density STS harvests it from
them?
A: "They" do nothing!!!! 4th density STS does it all through
them!
Q: (T) Well, I would like to know what is it in us that makes us attracted
to such people.
A: It was the idea of 4th density STS.
Q: That means that they can control your thoughts and emotions, put
ideas into your head, and you think it is a good idea to "save"someone.
You don't know. It is taught in our religions and culture to give until
it hurts, and, in fact, to give because it hurts. The whole situation
is designed and controlled from another level. Any further comment on
this subject?
A: Once you have truly learned the program, just plug it in.
Q: I guess once you have truly learned what is being said here, just
plug it in...
A: No. We mean that all you have to do is learn the patterns of behavior,
the subtle signs, and you will always have the ability of avoiding it.
Your own as well as others.
Q: So, once you have learned the program from this person, you will
be able to avoid getting into another, similar one. (T) But, I should
have learned it from H. I did the same thing twice. (L) Well, when
you are wounded, it is hard to see clearly.
A: The signs were present, but you did not read them.
Q: You ignored it.
A: No, he did not yet know the program. Anticipate not!
Q: I guess that means that when you are thinking that you can change
another person, or that changing something about what you are doing
naturally will help them, you are anticipating.
A: Or that it would be different that it turned out to be.
Of course,
all of the above was again interpreted by me as justification to continue
to work with Frank. Don't even ask how I managed to distort it that way.
I decided that since I was "learning the program" I could deal
with it effectively. I could prevent Frank from draining my energy. Ark
and I had discussed the growing problem with Frank's jealousy, and he
did not want me to do anything to "rock the boat" until he was
back in the States. He was sure that we would be able to reassure Frank
that he had a place in our lives and that we could all work together.
The owners and publishers
of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product
of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite
the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical
mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism"
nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in
all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth.
The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours
a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our
existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek
to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable
or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if
not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.
Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All
rights
reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered
trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become
the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication
and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website
in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive]
.
|
