Article - Laura Knight-Jadczyk


 

Knowledge and Being


Ιiriϊ Eolas


Signs of The Times

Site Map

Daily News and Commentary

The Signs Quick Guide

Note to New Readers

Archives

Search

Message Board

Books

The Secret History of The World by Laura Knight-Jadczyk

Discover the Secret History of the World - and how to get out alive!

 

 
Adventures with Cassiopaea
Chapters:

 

 

 

 

 

 





 



Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 30


Again, we come back to the question as to why this topic is - at the very least - subjected to such extreme prejudice that it amounts to concealment? Why are there so many books about things like the 10th Planet, or Precessional alignments related to world ages, Stargates, Galactic Core Explosions, and so forth, that pass with only mild criticism, yet Velikovsky's proposal of rains of cometary bodies was so viciously vilified? And this brings us back to that most interesting passage written by Wilhelm Reich:

Why did man, through thousands of years, wherever he built scientific, philosophic, or religious systems, go astray with such persistence and with such catastrophic consequences?" […]

Is human erring necessary? Is it rational? Is all error rationally explainable and necessary? If we examine the sources of human error, we find that they fall into several groups:

Gaps in the knowledge of nature form a wide sector of human erring. Medical errors prior to the knowledge of anatomy and infectious diseases were necessary errors. But we must ask if the mortal threat to the first investigators of animal anatomy was a necessary error too.

The belief that the earth was fixed in space was a necessary error, rooted in the ignorance of natural laws. But was it an equally necessary error to burn Giordano Bruno at the stake and to incarcerate Galileo?[…]

We understand that human thinking can penetrate only to a given limit at a given time. What we fail to understand is why the human intellect does not stop at this point and say: "this is the present limit of my understanding. Let us wait until new vistas open up." This would be rational, comprehensible, purposeful thinking. [Ether, God and Devil, Wilhelm Reich]

The only problem here is that we have discovered that the material IS available! There are MANY vistas of understanding that are open in our world to those with eyes to see! We have listed our sources, there are photographs and images of the proof that our planet has been repeatedly bombarded with showers of comets/asteroids; there exists stacks of evidence - recorded in books, papers, monographs, theories - that civilizations of greater advancement than our own have existed on the earth, and have been repeatedly destroyed. There are piles of evidence that attest to a far greater age of mankind than is presently accepted or taught by mainstream science. And in every case, this evidence is ignored, marginalized, explained or argued away, and those who wish to make such information public to a wider audience, are similarly marginalized and dealt with. What is even more interesting, as we noted previously, is the fact that the "mainstream occultists" have jumped on the uniformitarian bandwagon and are vigorously promoting reams of disinformation. And our own experience has been that our attempts to talk about this sort of thing have resulted in coordinated attacks from certain so-called "occultists," who have even sunk so low as to spend inordinate amounts of time roaming the internet, denouncing our research group as a "cult," writing libelous, defamatory public postings about us personally, and most importantly: attempting to destroy the C's material as a source of clues to our reality. Reich notes this problem and writes:

What amazes us is the sudden turn from the rational beginning to the irrational illusion. Irrationality and illusion are revealed by the intolerance and cruelty with which they are expressed. We observe that human thought systems show tolerance as long as they adhere to reality. The more the thought process is removed from reality, the more intolerance and cruelty are needed to guarantee its continued existence. [Ibid.]

And here is where we have to begin to really think about things in a reasonable and objective way. If there is so much evidence available - and there is - why is it so rabidly attacked and dismissed? Why is it necessary to defame, libel, crush and destroy those who bring up these matters, and who also produce the evidence? Most especially, why is this so, when we know that there ARE groups - such as the government and certain academics - who DO study these things, who do commission reports on them, who do collect the data? Just what they heck is going on? Why do they permit - no, actually encourage - the crazy ideas about 10th planets or Galactic explosions or precessional clocks of world ages - when the simple truth is so evident?

Reich proposed that the "adherence to the surface of phenomena" was related to "a certain connection with the structure of the human animal." He thought that the function of seeking the truth must be somehow "buried" since the tendency to "evade the obvious" was so powerful. In this idea, we are, of course, reminded of Castaneda's "Predator."

We have a predator that came from the depths of the cosmos and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. [...] You have arrived, by your effort alone, to what the shamans of ancient Mexico called the topic of topics. I have been beating around the bush all this time, insinuating to you that something is holding us prisoner. Indeed we are held prisoner! This was an energetic fact for the sorcerers of ancient Mexico. [...] They took over because we are food for them, and they squeeze us mercilessly because we are their sustenance. Just as we rear chickens in chicken coops, the predators rear us in human coops. Therefore, their food is always available to them.' [...]

"'I want to appeal to your analytical mind, ' don Juan said. 'Think for a moment, and tell me how you would explain the contradiction between the intelligence of man the engineer and the stupidity of his systems of beliefs, or the stupidity of his contradictory behavior. Sorcerers believe that the predators have given us our systems of beliefs, our ideas of good and evil, our social mores. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routinary, and egomaniacal.' [...]

In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous maneuver - stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist. A horrendous maneuver from the point of view of those who suffer it. They gave us their mind! Do you hear me? The predators give us their mind, which becomes our mind. The predators' mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now. [...]

Through the mind, which, after all, is their mind, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. [Castaneda, The Active Side of Infinity, 1998, pp. 213-220]

Reich, of course, decided that the cause of "needless human erring" was due to the "pathological quality of human character. In fact, this fits quite well with what Castaneda has written. "The Predators gave us their mind." Reich also pointed out, quite reasonably, that Religion, education, social mores, suppression of a true understanding of love, and so on were merely SYMPTOMS of this fact. And this is what led Reich to conclude:

The answer lies somewhere in that area of our existence which has been so heavily obscured by organized religion and put out of our reach. Hence, it probably lies in the relation of the human being to the cosmic energy that governs him.

As we have mentioned, Reich was moving dangerously close to describing the hyperdimensional reality. And, as a result, he, too, was subjected to overt intolerance and cruelty. And, as Reich so rightly noted, "Irrationality and illusion are revealed by the intolerance and cruelty with which they are expressed. […] The more the thought process is removed from reality, the more intolerance and cruelty are needed to guarantee its continued existence."

It is in this last remark that we come to some clue about the matter: intolerance and cruelty are NEEDED to guarantee the "cover-up." A certain kind of "human being" acts on behalf of this cover-up. A certain kind of human being acts as the playing pieces in the Secret Games of the Gods. And the C's have said that this has something to do with Economics.

And this brings us to other strange matters, something called Alternative 3 that is somehow mixed up with this cover-up of the ideas of the Holy Grail, the Ark of the Covenant, and the true history of mankind, including cyclic cometary destruction. Let me just insert a very couple of very strange little exchanges with the C's here that I would like the reader to have in mind as we go along:

10-21-95
Q: […] OK, where is the Ark of the Covenant currently located?
A: Alternative 3.
Q: (L) Alternative 3 is the plan to take all the people, all the smart guys, all the elite, off the planet and leave everybody else here to blow up, isn't it?
A: Maybe. Maybe not. [This "maybe not" was delivered in the midst of the next question and was originally included with the nest answer. But it rightly belongs here, and so I have moved it to retain the proper context.]
Q: (L) Where is it currently located?
A: Discover.
Q: (L) We're trying to discover through our interaction with you. How else can we discover something as obscure as this? I mean, that's a pretty darned obscure question, I would think. (SV) Who's in charge of Alternative 3, Laura? (L) That's too complicated.... (SV) Well, maybe they have it, who ever's in charge of it. (L) Well, are you gong to tell us anything about it?
A: Study alternative 3 to find answer!

Curiously, as we will discover, the very next question relates to the subject of Alternative 3, though I did not know it at the time.

Q: (L) OK, the Matrix Material says that Henry Kissinger is the current head of MJ12. Is this correct?
A: No.
Q: (L) Is he just a red herring, so to speak?
A: Yes. MJ12 is no longer MJ12.
Q: (L) What is MJ12 now known as?
A: Institute of Higher Learning.
Q: (L) Are you talking about Brookings Lab, or Brookhaven?
A: Not really.
Q: (L) Is it a specific institute of higher learning?
A: Yes.

And we will soon discover that Alternative 3 has a lot to do with HAARP as well.

02-17-96
Q: (L) […] Some people on the net want me to ask about this HAARP thing... seems to be some sort of antennae thing...
A: Disguise for something else.
Q: (L) What is that something else?
A: Project to apply EM wave theories to the transference of perimeters.
Q: (L) What does that mean?
A: If utilised as designed, will allow for controlled invisibility and easy movement between density levels on surface of planet as well as subterranially.
Q: (L) Who is in charge of building this thing?
A: More than one entity.
Q: (L) What groups?
A: INVELCO is one guise as well as UNICON and banking interest.
Q: (L) Who is in disguise as INVELCO and UNICON? Are they just dummy companies for cover?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Can you tell us if this is a human organization or aliens, or a combination?
A: Human at surface level. […]
Q: (L) Is there more you can tell us about this?
A: It has nothing to do with weather or climate. These things are emanating from 4th density, as we have told you before. […]
Q: (L) So, HAARP has nothing to do with the weather?
A: And also EM associated with same as reported.
Q: (L) So, when is this HAARP thing scheduled to go into operation?
A: Open.
Q: (L) Is it currently in operation?
A: Experimental.
Q: (L) How long have they been working on this thing?
A: Since the 1920s.
Q: (L) What?! The 1920s?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Well, that certainly is strange.

What is Alternative 3?

On Monday, June 20, 1977, the UK's Anglia Television broadcast the last program in a series of serious science documentaries called Science Report. All of the shows were produced by highly respected science reporters and it was simulcast in UK, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, Iceland, Norway, Sweden, Finland, Greece, and Yugoslavia. The title of the segment was Alternative 3, and it was never broadcast in the United States. Some say that the "powers that be" prevented it from being screened here.

The documentary presented the following purported "facts":

There is a secret joint US/USSR space program that has gone far beyond what the public sees. Astronauts landed on Mars in 1962. It has been discovered that there is other intelligent life in the universe. The earth is dying. We have polluted it beyond repair. The increasing "greenhouse effect" will cause the polar ice caps and glaciers to melt and flood the Earth.

There are three possible solutions for mankind:

Alternative 1 - Stop all pollution immediately and blow two huge holes in the ozone layer. This would allow excessive UV light to reach the earth and millions would die of skin cancer.
Alternative 2 - Immediately begin digging underground cities for the Elite (The "New World Order"?) - the lucky ones deemed worth saving - and let the teeming billions perish on the polluted surface.
Alternative 3 - Build spaceships and get the Elite off the planet - to the Moon and Mars. Kidnap and take along some "ordinary" people for use as slave labor. Use "mind control" techniques to control them. Leave the remainder of humanity to wallow in its own filth.

After the television show was aired, a book was published with three authors listed: Leslie Watkins, Christopher Miles, and David Ambrose. Christopher Miles, who also directed and co-wrote the documentary, is the brother of actress Sara Miles. The actual author of the book, Leslie Watkins, was a writer of thrillers even before Alternative 3. The Fortean Times later published an article in which Nick Austin, then editorial director of Sphere Books, revealed that he commissioned Leslie Watkins to write the book version for literary agent Murray Pollinger.

The question is, however, whether there was any fact behind that fiction. Bill Cooper, recently killed in a shoot-out with the law, incorporated many of the Alternative 3 elements into his conspiracy theories. The stories came fast and furious, and Alternative 3 was grafted onto the mythos of the Philadelphia Experiment that became the Montauk experiment as promulgated by Al Bielek and others. What is most interesting are the comments of the author of the book about the correspondence she received after its publication:

In fact, the amazing mountains of letters from virtually all parts of the world - including vast numbers from highly intelligent people in positions of responsibility - convinced me that I had ACCIDENTALLY trespassed into a range of top-secret truths.

Documentary evidence provided by many of these correspondents decided me to write a serious and COMPLETELY NON-FICTION sequel. Unfortunately, a chest containing the bulk of the letters was among the items which were mysteriously LOST IN TRANSIT some four years later when I moved from London, England, to Sydney, Australia, before I moved on to settle in New Zealand. For some time after Alternative 3 was originally published, I have reason to suppose that my home telephone was being tapped and my contacts who were experienced in such matters were convinced that certain intelligence agencies considered that I probably knew too much.

It would be a mistake to file "Alternative 3" away too cozily with Panorama's spaghetti harvest and other hoaxes. Suppose it were fiendish double bluff inspired by the very agencies identified in the program and that the superpowers really are setting up an extraterrestrial colony of outstanding human beings to safeguard the species? [Letter from Alternative 3 author Leslie Watkins to "MS Dittrich" of Windwords Bookstore]

I think that Leslie Watkins is onto something in saying that this story may have something to do with "top secret truths," but when we consider the modes of disinformation, we have to realize that the "truth" maybe not necessarily the story that is promoted, AS it is promoted. And it may have little to do with the setting up of an extraterrestrial colony of "outstanding human beings" in order to safeguard the species," as Watkins suggests.

Looking at the first "fact," and considering it as an item of disinformation, can we speculate about what it is designed to cover up or distract attention away from?

There is a secret joint US/USSR space program that has gone far beyond what the public sees. Astronauts landed on Mars in 1962. It has been discovered that there is other intelligent life in the universe.

 

Continue to page 264


The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

 

You are visitor number 3346 since April 16, 2009[TextCounter Fatal Error: Could Not Increment Counter].