passed, the "blame game" became more and more vague. After awhile,
he just would refuse to address the issue or answer any penetrating questions
at all, saying only that he knew who the guilty parties were, and would
reveal them at the proper time.
of 1979, the FBI lab report on the floorboards from Ira's closet were
disclosed. The tests showed no blood and/or human protein. Ira crowed
that this proved that Holly's body had not bee in his closet since September
of 1977. He began to declaim loudly and vociferously that he was NOW vindicated!
In an interview
with Claude Lewis of the Bulletin, Ira said:
no blood in the apartment, they found no blood in the entire apartment!
How can you fracture somebody's skull twelve, thirteen times, and no
have any blood? It's crazy... [...] The skull was supposedly fractured,
six to twelve - multiple times. You can't tell me blood didn't squirt
all over the place. And no matter how careful you are, you wouldn't
be able to get it all up! [...] With this new data, the ball is in my
court. [...] What this has given me is a new lease on life. I feel totally
free. I feel like a citizen of the world. I can go settle anyplace.
Because I'm going to do a book on all this." [Quoted by Levy]
Ira was gonna write a book. His book proposal said:
to write a book directed to a mass audience, for it is obvious that
my case has enormous mass appeal. [...] An inside view of someone who
lives on the edge of thought, but I will never become overly abstract
was rejected because Ira made it clear that, even though he would talk
about the murder, he would not speculate on who actually did kill Holly.
"This ambiguity will not detract from the value of the book, for
so much of the public interest in this case hangs upon the ambiguity of
my present public persona." [Quoted by Levy]
the book was going to be all about Ira, and how Ira so heroically dealt
with a nasty murder charge. Holly's life and experiences, who may have
killed Holly and why, was not important. The only thing that was important
was "the public interest [...] hangs upon [...] my public persona."
no time sending the FBI results around to everyone in his network. He
a court order to [get it] You may draw your own conclusions from this
behavior. It is what I have struggled against during the last 8 and
1/2 months of difficult uphill battle.
conspired against in the most hellish way; so many of my friends could
not grasp the conspiracy for it is beyond normal ken. [Read:
of course I understood, but that is because I am so speshul!]
For this there can be no blame or recriminations as the press played
right into the hands of those who wished to silence me. [Read:
All of you who doubted me, I forgive you - I will let you kiss my foot
if you ask nicely!] This is not the time to name them who are
guilty of murder - that will come.
And so on.
It was basically an appeal for money to pay his lawyers to defend him
against the "hellish conspiracy" that was now an established
fact, in his mind, because he had the evidence of the FBI report. Ira
promoted this item as "pivotal," and continues to do so to this
very day. What he doesn't talk about - because psychopaths never address
the things that cannot be addressed without exposing them for what they
are - is the fact that a negative result on the floorboards and plaster
did NOT preclude the possibility that blood or human protein might have
been in the materials at an earlier point, having dissipated in the eighteen
month interval between the murder and the discovery of the body.
continues to avoid the fact that a SECOND test, using newer and more comprehensive
methods showed that there WAS human protein in the floorboards and plaster!
Those who knew Ira said that he took this information very hard and that
this was what prompted him to flee. He KNEW he was nailed.
as April 17, 2000, Ira
is posting statements that somehow manages to mention the two FBI
chemical analyses as though they BOTH said that there was no evidence
of blood or human protein:
almost two years of pre-trial manoeuvring, which included much judicial
misconduct: Foreshortening of Xeroxed pages so that the damaging pages
of a now unnumbered report could be removed from the information due
to us; information that included a public sighting of my former girl
friend by three bank employees 6 months after I am supposed to have
killed her; and most significantly, a failure to accept two lab reports,
issued by the FBI and a nationally known laboratory, National Medical
Services, which did all the work on the O.J. Simpson case; reports made
at the instigation of the prosecution, which indicated that there was
no blood or human protein in the supposed leakage from the body and
that material found outside the trunk did not correspond to material
found inside the trunk. This was a stiff blow to the prosecution's contention
about the murder; the response: The most prestigious local magazine
published an article with blood on every page. Such behavior was repeated
no matter wherein I turned, and fearing the death penalty, I left Philadelphia
for a life underground.
the above remarks, a single person, a bank employee, who thought she saw
Holly in the bank (identified by a photo) after the time the murder was
supposed to have been committed, has now become THREE people. This identification
has always been regarded as mistaken because, in fact, there is no record
of any bank transaction by Holly AFTER September 11th. Why would she be
in the bank if she did nothing while there?
also quotes, as proof that he knew of a building threat, a letter from
Stafford Beer, about which Ira tells us "This conversation quoted
verbatim from Stafford's letter took place in the summer of 1977 about
two months before the murdered woman, Holly Maddux disappeared."
day I looked up from my desk and saw that someone was approaching down
the path. This was most unusual, because hardly anyone knew yet of my
whereabouts, which I was keeping virtually secret, and the place is
eight miles from the nearest village. I could hardly believe my eyes:
it was Ira. But yes - he would have been one of the very few who would
know my new address, because I wanted to keep up the flow of packages
I became locked in a fascinating discussion of very sensitive matters.
They concerned monumentally important scientific discoveries, and their
possible impact on human life and society. I have not to this day disclosed
what Ira told me, and I do not know whether what he told me can be substantiated.
I am sure that Ira believed what he said, and I could without difficulty
accept that it might be the case (that is, 'no alien life forms'). What
followed is indelibly fixed in my mind, and I shall get as near as I
can to the ipsissima verba:
'I am making a special visit to you, and to a few other friends who
have the knowledge to understand what I have found out, because my situation
"Stafford: 'I can believe it. Are you worried about your own government
or 'the competition?'
"Ira: 'Your call.'
"Stafford: 'Well, are you saying that you think you might be bumped
"Ira : 'The trouble is, that wouldn't do. It would provoke a whole lot
of investigation, and the truth might get out. No, I think that I have
to be in some way discredited.'
"Stafford: 'Aren't you in some way discredited already? Plenty of people
think you are a nut case. And plenty think you are immoral - a bad influence.
That lot got Socrates after all.'
"Ira: 'And the ideas survived. Just my point. No, it has to be a lot
stronger to count.'
"Stafford: 'Any Ideas?'
"Ira: 'None. I don't know what I need to protect myself against.'
"I can swear to this testimony. That's exactly what happened. It made
me apprehensive for my friend." [Stafford Beer]
the fact that Stafford Beer is interesting in his own right, the fact
is, Holly Maddux left Ira Einhorn in Europe in the midsummer of 1977.
When she left, it was already clear that Holly would be moving into her
own place. In other words, at that point in time, Ira already knew that
Holly had rejected him, and at that point in time, he began to plan her
demise. At that point in time, he began to plant the seeds of his "frame-up
theory" and his first "target" of this campaign was Stafford
"morphing of the story" was more elaborate, but again, casts
the blame on Holly for engineering her own death. This variation was given
to journalist Russ
Baker, who chronicles his experience with Einhorn in Esquire
Magazine. After much back and forth maneuvering, Einhorn finally lays
out the new theory as follows:
a tale that begins in the mid-1970s, with Ira penetrating deeper and
deeper into an understanding of the evil work of his government, chiefly
regarding psychic warfare and UFOs, and continues with Ira's growing
determination to expose the truth as he saw it.
involves a former CIA man, a current CIA man, a prominent ufologist,
shadowy figures, and psychic Uri Geller. This tale involves the scurrilous
rumor that the former CIA official, who at the time was head of the
Weird Desk at the CIA, had an affair with Holly Maddux. It is Ira who
calls this rumor scurrilous, but he brings it up repeatedly, and this
rumored affair is clearly the basis of Ira's theory of the crime.
to Ira] There was a great, roiling debate within the secret agency,
it seems, that centered on Ira. One faction favored the release of top-secret
data on the UFOs, the other did not. Ira was the loose cannon who was
going to blow the lid off the story. The CIA had to frame Ira for Holly's
murder, and to facilitate this, one of its men arranged an amorous liaison
with her. And Ira says that the former official's successor at the agency
is in "constant e-mail contact" with him, confirming parts of this story.
using my case to fight over the CIA stuff. I'm convenient."
the teller of the story, and Ira is the wronged hero of it, too.
It is a story that takes you on a tour of the interior of Ira's head.
[According to Ira] This story is the defense that Ira might have offered
at trial had he been there. It is impossible to tell whether he has
actually brought himself to believe it. [A
Touch of Eden,
Esquire Magazine; Russ Baker, December, 1999 Contributors Page)
was aware that Ira was "different" when he went to interview
him. However, what Russ didn't realize, and what so many, many people
do not understand, is the power of the psychopath. Russ comments on this
in some amazement:
not have imagined this a couple days ago, but after almost thirty hours
of Ira, I have to get away from him. Although I'm constantly aware,
on some level, of his manipulation, I also know that he is exceptionally
good at it. I suppose that I was not entirely prepared for this,
at least not to this extent. This is humbling. I do not know what
a clinical diagnosis of him would be, but he is masterful at manipulation.
He is a professional. There's a reason that he succeeded so spectacularly
on the lam for so long. I realize that I'm fighting to maintain perspective.
[Baker, Esquire, ibid.]
It is, indeed,
humbling to realize that, with all our powers of observation, all our
intellect, all our knowledge and awareness, we can still be captured and
manipulated. And any of us who think that we have a real handle on it,
that we cannot be fooled, or we assume that we are NOT being deceived
by a psychopath, better think again and apply some tests, and watch closely.
In the end,
the safest thing to do once one has the suspicion, or feeling, that something
is not quite right, that something is confusing, that something just doesn't
mesh, is to just get away! There is NO way you can interact with or converse
with or debate with a psychopath without getting slimed. None. Zip. Zilch.
to page 295
The owners and publishers
of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product
of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite
the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical
mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism"
nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in
all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth.
The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours
a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our
existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek
to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable
or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if
not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.
Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All
reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered
trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become
the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website
in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.
You are visitor number [TextCounter Fatal Error: This Page Not In Valid URI].