Adventures With Cassiopaea

Chapter 34

Back to 1962: Rita figured that her summer job would soon be over and she would return to school. She hoped that this would create the opportunity to extricate herself from Ira's clutches gracefully. But she had tried to be honest and deal with him like a normal human being. She made it clear that when September came, she did not wish to continue the relationship. What is interesting is that her expression of her wish to break up took on the form of a "moral failure" in Ira's mind. He, of course, was perfect and long-suffering. On July 28, he wrote in his journal:

Rita and I have come to an impasse - I can no longer tolerate either her selfishness or lack of faith. To give and give some more is my desire, but not to one so unthinking as her. My dreams are realizable and will not be snuffed out by the fear of anyone - I too have a right to a life of my own and to that I will dedicate myself. She lacks faith and the ability to respect another: Without these qualities, no matter what she is, she is as nothing. Come September and all is over. The pieces will be picked up and all started anew. The progress of my soul must not be crushed by the failings of a selfish young woman. So good-bye my love and good luck to my replacement - may he be more willing to be taken advantage of. [quoted by Levy]

In the above remarks, what catches my eye is Ira's remark "my dreams are realizable and will not be snuffed out by the fear of anyone." Just exactly what "dreams" did he wish to realize that Rita was afraid of? Why did he later relate this to the "progress of my soul" that was "crushed by the failings of a selfish" woman? What, exactly, did he want to DO that she refused to participate in? What "progress" of soul was he thinking about since he was also writing "let no cesspool of inner meaning be concealed. Reveal the filth that you are. Know that the animal is always there…"?

On July 30^th Ira had just read Venus in Furs, a sadomasochistic classic. As soon as he finished the book, he wrote in his journal:

We so carefully hide the blackness of our soul from all those around us (even ourselves) we forget so easily the impulses of power which unconsciously control so many of our actions! A book like Venus in Furs reminds us of what we are - blackness and light. To beat a woman - what joy - to bite her breasts and ass - how delightful - to have her return the favor in our sensitive areas. How is life to be lived? That is what the book asks unknowingly. Should we subjugate or be subjugated. Realize our darkness or at least become aware of it. Can I love Rita as she is or must I break her spirit. Does she provide me with what I want. Often I think not. Investigate - plunge deeply - leave no stone unturned. You are one of the rare free spirits do not be saddled by one who isn't. Life to be lived at its full must be lived freely. Let nothing stand in your way to getting what you can - not even the illusion of love which you know to be so transitory. [quoted by Levy]

Were there marks on Holly's body that Ira knew could identify him? Is that a reason he decided it was too risky to just dispose of it?

Rita had returned to Bennington at this point. Ira went after her and found her in her dormitory room and she made it clear that he ought to leave, that she did not want him there. And here we find what may have been the model of the story about the girl who fled to her dormitory in terror of what Ira had said to her.

"I probably said, 'We need to end this thing.'" she says. It was then that she perceived that silent click that told her that Ira had shifted into a darkly determined being. The shift was difficult to explain. It wasn't like he lost his reality, " she says. "He totally knew what he was doing. He just went over and locked the door. It was quiet, premeditated. It wasn't a rational buildup of temper at all. It was almost like, you watch one of those supernatural movies on television, and eyes change. Like a werewolf. It was like that truly. And so I knew then when that happened I was in the room with a madman."

The room was not large, and there was only one door. "I could have gotten out if I had been a more assertive person," says Rita, thinking back to when she was nineteen years old and youg Ira Einhorn was approaching her with madness in his eyes. "I could have screamed. But I didn't. I suppose I could have jumped out the window, but I was afraid of getting cut. The man was strong."

Ira Einhorn moved steadily toward her. He did not rush his movements. For a brief while, Rita Siegal tried to fight him off, but then she let go. Ira Einhorn's hands were around her neck, choking her. And then she passed out.

On July 31, 1962, Ira Einhorn wrote: "To kill what you love when you can't have it seems so natural that strangling Rita last night seemed so right." [Levy]

Apparently, Ira shared the incident with his friend, Michael Hoffman.

He talked about how, watching the color of her face change, something clicked at the last minute and he looked up, he let go.[quoted by Levy]

Ira later tried to convince Rita that he made sure she was still alive. She awoke to find his fingermarks still visible on her throat and spent the night at the school infirmary. She did not press charges against Ira, but she did talk with school authorities who banned Ira from the campus.

Steven Levy comments about Ira's "strange" reaction to the incident. After all, this event could have ended his career before it even started. He suggests that Ira "tried to will it to insignificance." But we know better by now. The psychopath does not have to "will" anything to insignificance. Everything BUT their own will IS insignificant. His reaction to it also reminds us of Nash and his arrest in California for trying to come on to a cop in a public restroom. Sylvia Nasar was similarly puzzled by Nash's "non-reaction."

Others may have sought help after almost killing a woman, but Ira seemed to regard it as a step in a struggle for self-realization. He did not even seem to think that it need affect his relationship with Rita, and a full month after the incident he wrote that "I want to love Rita (my entire being cries and needs the love we could have) but it is so difficult to anticipate the shifting of her unstable sands. Afraid, trapped, unsure, insecure… but beautiful in the desire which entirely grips her (even though she can't admit it to herself) to realize what she has…"[Levy]

Say what? The woman told him to get lost. He tried to kill her. And now he is saying that her fear of him is the "shifting of her unstable sands"??? And she is gripped by desire for Ira, only she just doesn't know it?

In your dreams, buddy!

What really bugs me is the fact that Ira's friend, Michael Hoffman, knew about this for YEARS.

Ira later said "I think people should be able to hit each other occasionally within the context of a structured situation where the violence is understood and accepted."

The end of Ira's one-sided relationship with Rita was a thorn in his flesh. He wrote to Michael Hoffman:

The melancholy that had plagued me like a silent specter ever since Rita left for good… I still love Rita but my spirit does not brood over lost glory or rage about with a fine frenzy; it has learned to sit and wait - to care and not to care and to be assured of others who will pursue the mystic union of flesh with the same ardor as the one I lost. [quoted by Levy]

Is the reader thoroughly sick of this guy yet? Is your stomach churning? Do you feel like you don't want to eat anything at the thought of somebody like that being out there in New Age Land, pretending to be an all-wise, all-knowing, caring and huggy-bear type of guru?

Allow me to bring your attention back to certain remarks of Gurdjieff that point out to us the danger, both from the activities of these "automatons," as well as our own reactions to them:

"So that in the actual situation of humanity there is nothing that points to evolution proceeding. On the contrary when we compare humanity with a man, we quite clearly see a growth of personality at the cost of essence, that is, a growth of the artificial, the unreal, and what is foreign, at the cost of the natural, the real, and what is one's own.

"Together with this, we see a growth of automatism.

"Contemporary cultures requires automatons. […] One thing alone is certain, that man's slavery grows and increases. Man is becoming a willing slave. He no longer needs chains. He begins to grow fond of his slavery, to be proud of it. And this is the most terrible thing that can happen to a man.

Which again reminds us of what Wilhelm Reich said:

What amazes us is the sudden turn from the rational beginning to the irrational illusion. Irrationality and illusion are revealed by the intolerance and cruelty with which they are expressed. We observe that human thought systems show tolerance as long as they adhere to reality. The more the thought process is removed from reality, the more intolerance and cruelty are needed to guarantee its continued existence.

Reich proposed that the "adherence to the surface of phenomena" was related to "a certain connection with the structure of the human animal." He thought that the function of seeking the truth must be somehow "buried" since the tendency to "evade the obvious" was so powerful.

Reich, of course, decided that the cause of "needless human erring" was due to the "pathological quality of human character. In fact, this fits quite well with what Castaneda has written. "The Predators gave us their mind." Reich also pointed out, quite reasonably, that Religion, education, social mores, suppression of a true understanding of love, and so on were merely SYMPTOMS of this fact. And this is what led Reich to conclude:

The answer lies somewhere in that area of our existence which has been so heavily obscured by organized religion and put out of our reach. Hence, it probably lies in the relation of the human being to the cosmic energy that governs him.

And that brings us back to Alternative 3 of which one of the main premises is the "joint US/USSR space program that is concealed by political posturing and maneuvers. Keeping in mind that disinformation is generally composed of truth wrapping a lie, we can suppose that there is, indeed, a "One World Government" at some level, where the US and Russia are unified in some effort. But it seems sort of transparently obvious that the statement is promoting the idea that it is a HUMAN government. The statement seems designed to distract our attention from the SUPER advanced technological capabilities of hyperdimensional existence and focuses it on a somewhat advanced human technology.

We have asked the question: what kinds of minds develop and operate with these "rules." And we have looked at John Nash and Ira Einhorn.

Game Theory is all about gaining control of the Free Will of others.

In Game Theory, the best way to know what knowledge or beliefs the players have or believe is most easily controlled by CREATING the beliefs that assist in the covering up of the information that would assist the player in formulating a winning strategy.

Are you offended by reading about Ira Einhorn? Do you feel that it doesn't belong on a site that deals with the development of knowledge and skills designed to set man free?

Please allow me to remind you that, based on the research I have read, the importance of psychopathy in the present day cannot be overstated. Simply put, it is a growing phenomenon and it is going to impact every single one of us individually and collectively in the not-too-distant future. It is also extremely important to understand psychopathy in order to be able to fully understand Game Theory and how it is the underlying dynamic being used at the present time to move all the pieces into place for the Secret Games of the Gods. As the C's say: knowledge protects, and the knowledge of the functional modes of the psychopath could save your life.

Continue to page 300

The owners and publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

Contact Webmaster at cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2009 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly prohibited without prior written consent.

You are visitor number [an error occurred while processing this directive] .